Sheriff: Father kills man sexually abusing his daughter

[refujiunderground]

Yup: Like the fact that the man not only stopped the assualt but beat him to death.

That's what we, who use receipts, like to call "facts".

Remind yourself, bro, you are the one telling illusive and fanatical tales of what could of happened. The rest of us are simply stating what went down while you make excuses for it.




How am I talking shit?

I'm the one in this thread that said death is not a punishment. I wanted to see that man suffer. Clearly you broke your neck trying to drag me and failed not even realizing my MO.





Welcome, to my latest hit thread


Keep it cute

yeah, sure buddy.

i'll just state the obvious that you had an opinion, i challenged it, you tried to defend yourself by using bits and pieces of the article failing to answer the questions i brought up. you accuse me of assuming what might have went down but you're doing the same thing too. i called you out on it and you try to ride the high horse basically admitting that you're full of shit.

all i'm saying is that in that situation, it's hard to shit on a man talking like you would take the higher road when the reality of the matter is you don't know what you would given that it was in the heat of the moment. you talk about how you would fuck him up and call the police. that man did the same thing and because the guy happened to die from the asswhipping he gave him. you run around talking about "i wouldn't have killed him". well, if that's the case, you might as well not even fuck him up then because you MIGHT kill him. once again, you assume that you're not capable of hurting somebody and my question is how so. are you a fighting expert? that's what i'm getting at. quit riding on your high horse, man because you're just looking silly.

i do not think the father beat him up with the intention of killing him. you're assuming that he did. that is an ASSUMPTION on your part and you have the nerve to talk about me assuming.

 

[DigitalFudge]

i admire your confidence though as if you are sure of yourself when you don't know what you're talking about.

Coming from the only guy in the thread talking about alternate endings to this story

 

[refujiunderground]

Coming from the only guy in the thread talking about alternate endings to this story

didn't you do that when you said "i would have fucked him up but i wouldn't kill him". wtf are you talking about? you pretty much judged the man by putting yourself in his shoes acting like you know what you would do if you were in that situation. just stop.

 

[diamondstar]

Thank fuck. Another child-raper off of the planet. Who gives a shit how it happened, I'm proud of this father for taking care of his daughter. I think anyone who's had their child be raped by a paedophile would applaud and commend this man's actions.

Agree. The more of their kind dies/killed off the better.

 

[DigitalFudge]

yeah, sure buddy.

i'll just state the obvious that you had an opinion, i challenged it, you tried to defend yourself by using bits and pieces of the article failing to answer the questions i brought up. you accuse me of assuming what might have went down but you're doing the same thing too. i called you out on it and you try to ride the high horse basically admitting that you're full of shit.

all i'm saying is that in that situation, it's hard to shit on a man talking like you would take the higher road when the reality of the matter is you don't know what you would given that it was in the heat of the moment. you talk about how you would fuck him up and call the police. that man did the same thing and because the guy happened to die from the asswhipping he gave him. you run around talking about "i wouldn't have killed him". well, if that's the case, you might as well not even fuck him up then because you MIGHT kill him. once again, you assume that you're not capable of hurting somebody and my question is how so. are you a fighting expert? that's what i'm getting at. quit riding on your high horse, man because you're just looking silly.

i do not think the father beat him up with the intention of killing him. you're assuming that he did. that is an ASSUMPTION on your part and you have the nerve to talk about me assuming.

i do not think the father beat him up with the intention of killing him. you're assuming that he did.

Oh my God!


When did I say the man wanted to kill him?! I said that he did.



I look silly? Show me the receipts.

You poor thing.

 

[DigitalFudge]

didn't you do that when you said "i would have fucked him up but i wouldn't kill him". wtf are you talking about? you pretty much judged the man by putting yourself in his shoes acting like you know what you would do if you were in that situation. just stop.

Excuse me?

"i would have fucked him up but i wouldn't kill him"

Now you are pushing me because that is a direct misquote.

I said "I would of fucked him up and called the police"




^^^


Wow I have all the proof in one single post how delusional you are.


*Saves for future receipts* I'm pretty much done with you now. I have absolutely no patience for people that have no grip on reality and try to sell others on their delusion. You're dismissed.

Perhaps there are threads that welcome that kind of tomfoolery



I suggest you check out "Fun and & Games"


Or "Current Events & Politics"

 

[DigitalFudge]

You can't carry out street justice. No matter how difficultly painful a crime is and how much it effected the father in this case, there is a legal system that needs to be followed. You guys can argue about intentions all you like, but that does not excuse the father's actions. The man who abused his daughter committed a heinous crime and should have been tried in the court system. The father also committed a serious crime being murder (and potentially first degree murder at that).

Oh and even if the father didn't kill him, he would still be held liable and would have to be tried. Street justice doesn't work. It's not the 1880s anymore where dueling was common.

I assure you refuji is the only one here pressed over intentions.


I agree with everything you said shocker, I know.

 

[pat grimshaw]

....It's not the 1880s anymore where dueling was common.

Formal dueling was outlawed in my country in the 1820s

 

[oakpope]

Thank fuck. Another child-raper off of the planet. Who gives a shit how it happened, I'm proud of this father for taking care of his daughter. I think anyone who's had their child be raped by a paedophile would applaud and commend this man's actions.

I disagree totally, once again revenge is not justice.

 

[oakpope]

I don't know if he, or I, would be satisfied with any punishment the justice system would have given.

The goal of Justice is not to satisfy the victim or the victim's family.

Rape is one the crimes that I loath the more and I'm with Jason on the castration. If think it's a solution, maybe not perfect, but preferable to prison which, without intensive therapy, wouldn't change the criminal urges of pedophiles.

But killing one is to lower oneself to his level. It's barbaric and unacceptable.

 

[Ninja108]

If there are any charges,murder won't be one of them. Good lucking finding any jury that would convict him on that. I won't be surprised if he gets off entirely.
He didn't hunt this man down and kill him,he walked in on him while the rape was occuring. Two different things in my book.

 

[DigitalFudge]

That's a really good point ^^^ The lawyers know that I am betting too.


The Jurors would probably giggle at them trying to push that.

 

[DigitalFudge]

^^^ Smfh

 

[Telstra]

You are right, "After the man was knocked on his ass you were no longer "Protecting your daughter""

The killer should be jailed like any other killers.
He is a violent guy and might kill again.

 

[DigitalFudge]

^^ I mean what's so hard to understand?

Whoops meant that for telstra but agree with both of ya'll tbh

 

[Kulindahr]

^Kulindahr is a naturalist.

Every time he goes "au naturel", he is in danger of being falsely labeled a sex offender.

That's "naturist" -- a naturalist studies nature; I just enjoy it.

^I think it important to remember, Kulindahr, that the counselor serves to treat the offender, not the victim.

I think this fact may explain some of the responses that the offenders gave the audience.

If they'd actually been in treatment for "years", and were still talking in ways that avoid their responsibility, she's a fraud, and I wouldn't trust anyone she's "treated" back on the street. Much of what passes for sex offender treatment is a joke anyway, but anyone with any claim to being able to do counseling knows you don't let an offender of any type play games that avoid taking responsibility, whether the issue is alcohol, repeated vandalism, or sex offenses.

 

[Kulindahr]

I understand that, but I honestly don't understand why people think he did 'good'. Cause he didn't. People are only looking at it through their own moral glasses.

In this situation no one leaves happy. He is going to be in jail out of his daughters life, daughter is going to have an absent father because of it and she is going to be traumatized. Obviously in a time where she needs her father the most. I don't think the father is going to be in jail happy about the people who think he did good, he's going to be missing his daughter.

Jail?

The sheriff said the guy did the right thing and there would be no arrest.

 

[Telstra]

It seems like alot of people here support might is right.
No law is needed.

 

[Kulindahr]

But the fact still stands. We as a society are quick to pass judgement when in fact we have little to no education on the topic we're condemning.

You got that right. For all the talk by so many people that they don't trust the government, they're awfully quick to decide someone should be killed because the government labeled him a child molester.

He did the right thing and there would be no arrest? That's a poor precedent to set.

LOL

It's hardly "setting" a precedent; in much of the country, that's just following precedent.

 

[Kulindahr]

A couple of things:

The only way to know how you react in a situation is if you have trained for it and then verified your training by being in that situation.

There is no moral justification for continued violence once the threat has been ended.

In situations like this, our reasoning tends to shut down and out animal hindbrain takes over.