Congress is about to censor the Internet.
according to firefox:
http://www.mozilla.org/sopa/?WT.mc_ID=sopa-snippet
according to firefox:
http://www.mozilla.org/sopa/?WT.mc_ID=sopa-snippet
PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
"piracy" of movies and music : shouldn't an object that costs nothing to produce and distribute be of very small ( = nothing , really ) value ? and the point made perhaps as a joke but still very truthful : to all the owners of movies and music : if people don't want your stuff even for free then you ought to be worried .
Here's the congressional money trail from SOPA supporters in entertainment and publishing.
How will they vote?
Top recipients for ALL supporting interest groups
Name
Amount Received
Sen. Harry Reid [D, NV]
$2,335,183
Sen. Charles Schumer [D, NY]
$2,016,955
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand [D, NY]
$1,650,251
Sen. Barbara Boxer [D, CA]
$1,163,223
Sen. Michael Bennet [D, CO]
$767,772
Sen. Patrick Leahy [D, VT]
$737,110
Sen. Robert Portman [R, OH]
$714,176
Sen. Mark Kirk [R, IL]
$471,721
Sen. Ron Wyden [D, OR]
$423,313
Sen. Patty Murray [D, WA]
$413,000
Rep. Howard Berman [D, CA-28]
$454,598
Rep. Bruce Braley [D, IA-1]
$360,989
Rep. Michael Capuano [D, MA-8]
$320,580
Rep. Patrick Meehan [R, PA-7]
$249,800
Rep. Allyson Schwartz [D, PA-13]
$243,319
Rep. Eric Cantor [R, VA-7]
$239,300
Rep. John Barrow [D, GA-12]
$218,080
Rep. Gary Peters [D, MI-9]
$216,748
Rep. Nancy Pelosi [D, CA-8]
$213,550
Rep. Carolyn Maloney [D, NY-14]
$209,610
I've been in the creative arts for a long time. I try to make a few bucks now and again on my efforts and, yes, sometimes I do worry about my copyrighted, published work being hi-jacked by others who may profit from it.
I could support legislation to stop the piracy from happening, but not this Bill. Here's where they lose my vote:
Per the Washington Post article referenced above: "The bill also includes provision that could hold third parties — payment-processing and other partners — responsible for piracy and counterfeiting on other sites, some critics say."
Punishing a website (such as JUB, or any other third party Hosting site) is wrong. If you can't find the actual perpetrator, keep on looking; don't take it out on any unwitting 3rd party. They don't have the staff, the money, or the time to be checking every little piece of content uploaded by 6 billion people.
Consider me Signed.
I've been in the creative arts for a long time. I try to make a few bucks now and again on my efforts and, yes, sometimes I do worry about my copyrighted, published work being hi-jacked by others who may profit from it.
I could support legislation to stop the piracy from happening, but not this Bill. Here's where they lose my vote:
Per the Washington Post article referenced above: "The bill also includes provision that could hold third parties — payment-processing and other partners — responsible for piracy and counterfeiting on other sites, some critics say."
Punishing a website (such as JUB, or any other third party Hosting site) is wrong. If you can't find the actual perpetrator, keep on looking; don't take it out on any unwitting 3rd party. They don't have the staff, the money, or the time to be checking every little piece of content uploaded by 6 billion people.
Consider me Signed.
Agreed Congress is a whore for the highest bidder, unlike ALL the parliaments of other countries who never kowtow to moneyed interests. Riiiiiight!
Also agree that stealing copyrighted material should be stoppable.
The internet has bred a sense of entitlement because of early-on anonymity and slacker ethics. Grow a pair, and pay for your entertainment. There is plenty of free content without stealing stuff.
Thanks for posting. Signed.
Oh please.
the only sites that need to worry are sites that deal in pirated content. <snip>
