The main problem I have with the term "straight-acting" is the word "act". It implies a sham or a pretense, and nearly every time, that isn't the case.
Which is more or less what I've been trying to say although not quite as eloquently.
PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
The main problem I have with the term "straight-acting" is the word "act". It implies a sham or a pretense, and nearly every time, that isn't the case.
Hi.
This is by no means a rant, but I want to ask you to think about how you may use language that describes you, that may describe us as gay men.
It is true that language is most effective when it is most understood. So, even when language is being misused, if it is understood correctly, communication is still being effective.
An example of that would be the popular use of "gay" as an epithet. Even though the definition of "gay" could simply be homosexual, it is instead thrown out as a derogatory remark, usually to mean something outrageous, silly, and therefore not admirable, a subject of derision.
I argue the same misuse is occurring every day by gay men when the term "straight acting" is used. The clear meaning is that average appearance, and more specifically, the clear lack of effeminate, flamboyant, or other affectations, is the definition of "gay." The impression is further reinforced by the tacking on of "acting," implying that gay men are all raving queens on the inside but able to evince some average behaviors as some sort of closeted cover.
Don't get me wrong: raving queens are valid gay individuals just as much as any other, but are by no means the definition of gay for all of us. Of late, I notice a great number of gay men adopt a Nellie persona when trying to be identified as "gay," even though a lot of gay men are not self-identifying as effeminate, hence the growing use of "straight acting."
There doesn't have to be a tug of war for who is going to be the gay poster child. We can all be gay, and no one stereotype has to be the mascot.
Why should we use the term that helps us to be marginalized, ridiculed, and disrespected? Why can't we simply say, "I am just an average sort of guy." That doesn't try to define "normal," nor does it put down the effeminate nor adopt any cliche for a gay stereotype.
Of course, who wants to just be average? Actually, a lot of us do. For a population that is often excluded because others define us as "other," many of us would enjoy nothing more than just being another man on the street.
Think about it.![]()
straight acting implies that acting straight is more acceptable, and while that may be true, i don't necessarily think that means you are hiding yourself so you aren't "pegged"
I wish I could say that I neglected this thread on purpose, as a sort of hands-off approach to letting it run un-micromanaged, but I just got busy and didn't get back soon enough. Pot boiled over here.
Been trying to get back to posting and reading here again. Will try harder.
I'll try to reply to way too many posts here, without the quoting, so forgive the clumsy references.
The 'straight acting' myth has been discussed in this forum many times over the past years and there are many people here who believe that all gay men are queens at heart. They firmly believe that gay men walking about in public who can't be pegged as 'gay' are simply repressing their gay mannerisms (i.e. 'acting straight') and switch into active 'queen' mode the moment they step through their doors back home.
I don't 'act straight'. I'm just being myself. The simple fact of the matter is, I can't 'act gay'. I can't do the voice. I can't do the walk. I can't do the hands. I can't do any of it. I really don't know how to.
You know what's funny? When I first went on gay hookup sites 4 years ago, I noticed a lot of self-described straight-acting guys. A good portion of them didn't look straight acting at all. And a good portion of the ones I met in person weren't all that straight acting either. Whether it was voice or mannerisms, it was often detectable, if not downright obvious that they were gay.Of course, who wants to just be average? Actually, a lot of us do. For a population that is often excluded because others define us as "other," many of us would enjoy nothing more than just being another man on the street.
Think about it.![]()
Stop living your adult life as if you're still in middle school and kids are taunting you because you're gay acting. It doesn't matter anymore. Be who you are.
Not half as boring as your posts.
Dude, you watch the Golden Girls. If that is not an effeminate interest, then what is? You can't get more stereotypical gay than watching the Golden Girls.
I know LOTS of straight men and women that love The Golden Girls.
and to a restaurant for dinner without being like "dude we're buds" ...and that isnt the kind of relationship i look for to satisfy my needs. 