The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Sweatpants / Mesh Shorts Fetish

That would be with regard to manufacture and distribution of the garment AND claiming that it is 'authentic mormon underwear'. There are several companies selling reproduction mormon underwear with not a litigation in sight. In addition, there is no law against publishing images of them.

I could understand your being offended if you were a practising Mormon, but I find your indignation of something that you have rejected somewhat confusing.

Regardless, we have no intention of removing any images of models wearing either authentic, or reproduced, Mormon undergarments.

No disrespect, but I don't believe I indicated that I was offended. This isn't a play on words or implications. As this is a public forum then I do realize I was out of place asking, as a former LDS, to remove photos. Sincerest apologies.

You did enlighten me to the news that companies were reproducing the garment. Thank you. I knew of other Mormon based churches using and reproducing the garment but only for ordinance work and for members to wear. I won't ask what companies because I don't want to come off as a douchebag or a bigot.

As for the legality of reproducing pictures, etc., I was wrong. I contacted the Church Office Building in SLC to inquire about the policies. Once the garment is purchased by a member with who has been through the temple, it is by the conscience of the buyer what to do with the product. Again, sincerest apologies.
 
None of which really explains your indignation at the depiction of a Mormon in his official underpants.



An aside, I'd be interested to see if there was any legal liability at all. Can you patent clothing or uniforms, especially based on the typical existing design of pants in general? What's so special about them to make them the official underwear of the Church of LDS?

An additional aside: use of words like endowment (and membership) in your argument is setting the rest of us up for hours of sheer comedy gold, and you up for endless piss-taking. You've been warned... (!) --%--

-d-

I explained why I was here because another asked.

I did realize that the usage of the word endowment would beg a sexual response or snicker. That's okay, when i actually matured to the age where I could understand the different meanings...I snickered too. And still do on occasion.
 
tumblr_mg6h5mK3g41qzj6szo1_1280.jpg

Here's another of this guy
tumblr_mg6j3bPvt31qzj6szo1_1280.jpg
 
I have contacted the site administrator inquiring about the membership of the models. Per LDS policy, the garment is to be worn by members or persons who have been through the temple. Wearing such garments outside of membership or endowment can lead to legal issues as they are not a public product. It is distribution and redistribution of the product or similar material in any format not meeting LDS standards can result in a lawsuit.

Dude, you were excommunicated and cast into outer darkness--as if they have the power to do so--so what do you care.
The undergarment is not in scripture, so don't worry about it. They betrayed you.
 
What a drama about some pics of religious undies. Doesn't the first amendment cover the freedom to use religious symbols in an artwork? I think it does. Some people might find it controversial or offensive, or not much of an artwork, but that's all subjective and that doesn't make it illegal. If you want laws like that, try Saudi Arabia or Iran.
 
It's important to emphasize that guys should free-ball. Underwear is for kids. Once you mature, you free-ball. Men wear pants without underwear. Jeans, shorts and even suits. And of course especially sweatpants.
 
^^ Not true. Freeballing isn't always comfortable. If you're working all day long or at the gym, freeballing doesn't always feel good.
 
Hot, hot, hot.

There was a guy at my gym last week who had to be going commando. His dick was flopping around in his sweats. He was hung and you could see the outline of his head. I had to go back into the locker room because I couldn't stop watching and was getting hard lol.
 
Back
Top