StSinner
Virgin
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2012
- Posts
- 40
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
That would be with regard to manufacture and distribution of the garment AND claiming that it is 'authentic mormon underwear'. There are several companies selling reproduction mormon underwear with not a litigation in sight. In addition, there is no law against publishing images of them.
I could understand your being offended if you were a practising Mormon, but I find your indignation of something that you have rejected somewhat confusing.
Regardless, we have no intention of removing any images of models wearing either authentic, or reproduced, Mormon undergarments.
No disrespect, but I don't believe I indicated that I was offended. This isn't a play on words or implications. As this is a public forum then I do realize I was out of place asking, as a former LDS, to remove photos. Sincerest apologies.
You did enlighten me to the news that companies were reproducing the garment. Thank you. I knew of other Mormon based churches using and reproducing the garment but only for ordinance work and for members to wear. I won't ask what companies because I don't want to come off as a douchebag or a bigot.
As for the legality of reproducing pictures, etc., I was wrong. I contacted the Church Office Building in SLC to inquire about the policies. Once the garment is purchased by a member with who has been through the temple, it is by the conscience of the buyer what to do with the product. Again, sincerest apologies.


































