To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
How can Cher look good for her age when she nor anyone else knows what she would look like at 63, after being a Hollywood Science Project for all these years. Saying someone looks good for their age, means they aged well naturally.
Yes, I can understand that. I guess it's a little easier for me to criticize since I was lucky enough to age naturally. So, I don't think it's fair when someone praise these plastic looking people & say they look good for their age.
Cher looks like she DID have "work done" on her: the difference is that in Cher it was a damn GOOD job.Natural in hollywood is an oxymoron. There are very very very few that have not been pulled, plumped, or peeled. Its a fact of life in hollywood. You have to look good on camera or you dont get hired.
If Cher looked her age I doubt many people would be buying her cd's etc. There are many other woman Cher's age that have had work done and yes they look like older woman that have had work done. So i also say its good genes as well.
As Cher once said, If I want to put my tits on my back its not anyones business but my own.
Heres one example of someone Chers age that has had work done and looks like they had work done. Here is actress Joan Van Ark aged 64.
![]()
![]()
I love Cher and I think she's always been beautiful but that recent photo isn't flattering at all. The eyeshadow doesn't suit her. Neither does the wig and she looks like she's gained a lot of weight.
Cher will always be hot in my book. Just wish she was still with Sonny Bono. They were so good together.
She's 63 for Fuck's sake: you can't be that age and keep slim without your muscle fibers and bones showing up everywhere... if you want to keep a smooth body that you can show at that age, it must be rather plumpy.I love Cher and I think she's always been beautiful but that recent photo isn't flattering at all. The eyeshadow doesn't suit her. Neither does the wig and she looks like she's gained a lot of weight.
Hollywood isn't America! And if Cher want to put tits on her back she have every right to do so. I am not against enhancement surgery but anyone saying that she looks good for her age needs to keep in mind that no one knows what she may or may not have looked like if she had aged naturally.
But what does "aging naturally" means anyway? The way you're putting it, people who take care of their skins with cream, people who take care of their hair, people who go to the gym, aren't "aging naturally". So pretty much 99% of people.
I'm all for doing what you gotta do to look good as long as it is subtle and you still look like you. Botox, this or that...I'm all for it as long as the person looks good.
That would be bad news for the surgeons at the Seattle Grace Hospitalaging naturally means NO sugery, but anything else is fine.
aging naturally means NO sugery, but anything else is fine.
