The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

the mods must be crazy

Are the mods crazy?

  • Yes too pro hillary

    Votes: 6 13.6%
  • yes too pro Obama

    Votes: 4 9.1%
  • not enough mccain love

    Votes: 1 2.3%
  • no

    Votes: 17 38.6%
  • dunno

    Votes: 1 2.3%
  • dont care

    Votes: 3 6.8%
  • not applicable

    Votes: 4 9.1%
  • yes because they've allowed this poll to remain

    Votes: 8 18.2%

  • Total voters
    44
  • Poll closed .
Obama. "Sweetie." A little less whining? A little more policy? Sweetie, does it always have to be about you?


If the mods will allow me to say so...attacking the mods is the most chickenshit political argument I've seen here.

No offense, "sweetie."

.
.
.
 
Sweetie ....that is a peach of a comment. Between Wright and the Sweetie comment it would appear we are electing the black Archie Bunker.

I digress.

I did not say and did not mean to infer that because no one likes Ann Coulter that they are not offended when she is called a cunt. I meant to say that no one is offended because they do not identify with Ann. There is a difference.

If there is a valid argument to be held about a particular person, policy or current affair then state the affair and state your dislike of it. Something that says:

"Stupid fucking idiot moron asswipe shithead crossdressers" is a statement that seeks reaction from the queens of the night. Nothing more. It loses all of its validity as an argument because it is sensed as an attack on that group who frequent (I would think) JUB. Same goes for a Hillary attack thread that just throws names. Believe me I am the last to defend Hillary but playgorund name calling doesn't accomplish anything but to attack those specific people who support her.

Who in here supports Ann Coulter? Who in here is offended?

Really?


In my humble opinion, the idea in this forum is to prove some point or another with valid facts or opinion where fact isnt readily available. That point or opinion will undoubtedly be challenged no matter how benign. Did ya see the thread that described a hacker trying to set off seizures? Anyone with a moral compass can see that giving someone a seizure as a joke is not a joke. However, we had someone argue that point and provide some salient opinions as to why. I disagree BUT the point is it entailed discussion that was not about wrote baiting or simple attack for the sake of attack. There are legion of websites where you can get your fill of that vitriol. Where you can call someone a name and then get a high five.

It all comes down to your environment.

Then again there are guys in here who will attack in a way that is felt but defendable. I dont possess one of those 800 pound brains but I appreciate their wit. Playgorund attacks wont be accepted. You also made such a point of Hillary or Ann being a cunt that I doubt in a normal thread you can get away with just insulting Hillary as a cunt while making valid arguments. You made the issue too sensitive and acute. So there we are......

My two dimes and a nickel.
 
^ No - EVERYBODY's minding the store. :D

Time some of the rest of us also got exposed to the flames in the political kitchen ;).
 
Well you guys should come back your doin better than Bush or the congress but not quite as well as the military.

If you take in the "NO" your not crazy vote and count it as trust for the mods then we arrive at 40.5%

Add in the Swing voters (the Dunno and Dont Cares) and your up to 54 Percent approval rating.

The military was given a 84 by all walks of life in the PEW Research Center Poll but to be fair as most posters at JUB could be identified as liberal ....even the Liberal gave the military a 71% confidence factor.

I need not point out the Bush Job approval rating because we are all so well informed but I will point out that the Federal approval is at its lowest in at least a decade.

You equal the news media at 40% favorable opinion which makes ya a bunch of O'Reillys

So take heart Mods by the numbers America loves you

All of the figures were collected by the Pew Research center with the exception of the JUB opinion poll. there is a +/- 50 percent margin of error. Okay I made that last part up up. :p
 
^ No - EVERYBODY's minding the store. :D

Time some of the rest of us also got exposed to the flames in the political kitchen ;).
So you're saying that CP&E is the thread where the mod gang bangs take place!:p
 
If you check the threads, CE&P no longer has any assigned Mods for the moment, so let's see what happens. :p

Heh well at least somebody was listening.

thanks for the notice Kulindahr. That's kind of the way i picture the mods, out wandering around with a coke bottle thinking it means something.
 
some moderators pick and choose what they censor.
 
Don't think any of the mods are any more crazy than I am, but then again I'm a mod myself! :mrgreen:

I'm not exactly ecstatic about any of the candidates. Clinton seems to be more of the pro-gay candidate but I really can't stand the woman. McCain gives me the feeling that he would be nothing more than just the same old Bush garbage. If there is one candidate I like the most it would be Obama, that's probably because I know the least about him. But, then again I'm not a regular mod to this forum!

Long live Springboksfan, Centexfarmer, Opinterph, Stevenavy, and Snapcat! :p

Love all you guys! :luv: (*8*) :kiss:

Get back in the dungeon, we didn't say you could speak! :cowboy:

:p




:lol:
 
If you check the threads, CE&P no longer has any assigned Mods for the moment, so let's see what happens. :p

Moderators are entitled to express their own personal opinions just like any other member.

I haven't seen any evidence that any moderator has abused their position in order to promote their own ideas.

In some cases the moderation here may have been rather "heavy handed" - but I think these mistakes are more due to over enthusiasm rather than the result of any political bias.
 
BTW - I assume you guys have all had another look at the bottom of this Forum to see the names of the assigned Mods?...
 
Back
Top