The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

The next pandemic: DETRANSITIONERS!

PipRosi said:
Watch this vid and tell me that this guy is not meant to be a man:
Click to expand...

He looks convincing as a man. He 'passes' to borrow a term. But should that be the benchmark?

Where I have issues is when a Timothy (or Trans Identified Male) wants to live as a woman before bottom surgery, and invade women's locker rooms, women's prisons and other safe spaces for women. Then inclusion becomes intrusion.
 
Shit, man. Did you not watch it? I wasn't only meaning his appearance. I'm talking about his whole journey and what he's got to say about it. *noises of flabbergast and irritation
 
PipRosi said:
Shit, man. Did you not watch it? I wasn't only meaning his appearance. I'm talking about his whole journey and what he's got to say about it. *noises of flabbergast and irritation
Click to expand...

Yes and he's a famous case so I already knew a bit about him but like I said, the issues are with the transtrenders who fake it. The men who invade women's spaces. Women invading men's spaces is less problematic because we ain't scared of them.
 
Zeno Lorea said:
Those videos were wonderful. Especially the first one in which "Harrison" claims he must be white, really, because he feels he doesn't get the respect he deserves. Ouch. The truth hurts.
Click to expand...

I'm not gonna recommend making Atlanta regular viewing. It's more miss than hit, that one particular episode happened to be gold.

"Nice tolerance" :rotflmao:
 
Lately I've been travelling a lot and I don't do much internet on small screens (except for insta or other apps that are ideal for small screens) but when I'm home I sometimes spend hours watching FB and Youtube vids. And so I discovered this lovely lesbian who does quite a few vids on trans and detrans issues. Heartbreaking stories.

 
LeicsDom said:
I know from personal experience that medics are far too often capitulating to patients' self diagnosis for a quiet life
Click to expand...

In many places that has even become the law: if someone says they are trans, they are trans. You are no longer allowed to question their self-diagnosis, only "affirm" their feelings. What could go wrong?
 
Yeah...it would be like declaring that you are a homo and then being subjected to constant questioning and challenges from family, friends, strangers and the press about your self-diagnosis.

What indeed could go wrong?
 
Tho while I'm here, the actual regret rate is one percent. Hell, I'll be generous with ya'll and double it via absolutely no proof but what's been fallin' out of some of yuse asses;
if it were 2% then transitioning still has less of a regret rate shown than every other surgical procedure one can name that I'm aware of.

I can practically smell the fear that someone doesn't resemble your own head in the mirror.
 
luckynumbah7 said:
Tho while I'm here, the actual regret rate is one percent. Hell, I'll be generous with ya'll and double it via absolutely no proof but what's been fallin' out of some of yuse asses;
if it were 2% then transitioning still has less of a regret rate shown than every other surgical procedure one can name that I'm aware of.
Click to expand...
That 1% regret rate is what is not true. It's an oft-repeated mantra, but it's entirely based on one single study from the Netherlands, which was done by a transgender clinic among its own patients. In other words, it asked the very people who were STILL in contact with the clinic if they regretted their transition. Most people who regret transition or even detransition, don't stay with the same clinic, counselors and surgeons. And curiously, the 1% regret rate was based on the less than 70% of patients they were still in contact with. Over 30% had been "lost to follow-up" which could mean they had relocated to a country the Amsterdam clinic had no contact with, or simply gone off the radar, or detransitioned without their help, or worse.
 
Still trying to figure out why you felt the need to resurrect this thread.

You have no point to prove...just some axe that seems to need grinding. See my reply to your (re)-opening post.

If the point still is flying too far above your head, then ask yourself why you think you have a more legitimate right to self-identification than other people you don't actually know and who do not interfere with your life in any way.
 
Zeno Lorea said:
That 1% regret rate is what is not true. It's an oft-repeated mantra, but it's entirely based on one single study from the Netherlands, which was done by a transgender clinic among its own patients. In other words, it asked the very people who were STILL in contact with the clinic if they regretted their transition. Most people who regret transition or even detransition, don't stay with the same clinic, counselors and surgeons. And curiously, the 1% regret rate was based on the less than 70% of patients they were still in contact with. Over 30% had been "lost to follow-up" which could mean they had relocated to a country the Amsterdam clinic had no contact with, or simply gone off the radar, or detransitioned without their help, or worse.
Click to expand...
So you are questioning a 1% out of a 70%... then assume the 30% must involve some 70 or 80% of detransitioners?

Wouldn't this be a question of just

how many stupid, clueless people go around without knowing what they want and who they are,

meeting

stupid, greedy and/or clueless medical practitioners, bureaucrats and sectarians as usual,

coalescing with transgender issues?


It sounds so very much like the antivacciners discourse: they fall into the pit of an issue that troubles them, which makes them hate it, and they will hold to whatever number and rate they will ignore in any other issue that they do not care about because it falls out of their agenda of interests.


What about focusing on people to detransition from being gay and "return" to breeder life, even without breeding involved?


But I guess we have to have counter-activists for everything, now that we are living in such MARVELous times.
 
rareboy said:
Still trying to figure out why you felt the need to resurrect this thread.
Click to expand...
Because it's still there?

cat-cpr-cat.gif
 
rareboy said:
Still trying to figure out why you felt the need to resurrect this thread.

You have no point to prove...just some axe that seems to need grinding. See my reply to your (re)-opening post.

If the point still is flying too far above your head, then ask yourself why you think you have a more legitimate right to self-identification than other people you don't actually know and who do not interfere with your life in any way.
Click to expand...

Reminds me of a line by the late Barry Humphries, who referred to modern comedians who "self-identify as funny".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top