To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
I think if there was a D next to the guys name people here would be singing a slightly different tune about his taste.
It sounds like "Zu" is just fine with the "double standard" of a closeted homosexual politician working against homosexuals like Zu. And that Zu wants us to be okay with that as well.
Indeed.
And yet, Schock himself insists he is straight, and has a perfect record of voting against gay rights.
The lady doth protest too much, methinks. - sorry, WillAnd yet, Schock himself insists he is straight
It sounds like "Zu" is just fine with the "double standard" of a closeted homosexual politician working against homosexuals like Zu. And that Zu wants us to be okay with that as well.
Yes, because that's exactly what I said. Apparently "let's support a more legitimate criticism than the way this guy decorates his office" is now code-speak for "I support closeted gay anti-LGBT Republicans."
The only thing that makes this story interesting is the fact that Schock was so insistent on keeping his office decor secret. The Washington Post might not even have run the story. And if they had, it would have just been a silly "puff" piece in the style section. No one would have noticed, or cared.
I don't think Schock would much care for the Pride smilie.
A veritable "wolf in sheep's clothing". I wonder if his anti-gay stances* are fooling anyone? Nice halo.

BTW, I don't for a minute buy the idea that Schock resigned over the spending allegations. What I have read of these does not make them sound that serious, comparatively speaking.
I think someone has irrefutable evidence of Schock's homosexuality, and is blackmailing him. I think Schock is using the decorating thing as a cover under which to resign.
In the 21st century, of course, homosexuality would not normally be a reason to resign from public office. But Schock has been so homophobic and so hurtful to our cause that it would be devastating to him for his sexuality to be revealed.
A dozen years from now, some reporter will look up this (by then long-forgotten) congressman, and discover that he is married to his same-sex partner and living happily in obscurity. Thanks to liberties he tried to prevent while in office.
A pejorative for us used to be (is?) interior decorator. I think "the decorating thing" was a bad idea.I think Schock is using the decorating thing as a cover under which to resign.

