The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

The U.S. is doomed due to the ignorant, selfish masses

RonR18

JUB Addict
Inactive
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Posts
4,393
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
Uranus
The recent election of the Republican health reform saboteur in Massachusetts is a good example of why there's no hope for the U.S. We are doomed due to the extremely ignorant masses, as well as the ability of the greedy special interests to legally bribe political whores. Presidential elections have essentially degenerated into a lying contest in which the best con-artist wins, and the gullible voters fall for the same b.s. every time.

A lot of it boils down to blatant selfishness as well, in that most people only care about their own interests. For example, the majority of people who have health insurance simply don't give a rats ass that 45 thousand Americans are dying from illnesses each year they can't afford to have treated. As evidenced by the fact that the voters of MA already have mandatory health insurance. Basically, the selfish people who voted Brown into office are going to have a LOT of blood on their hands when national health reform goes down in flames.
 
And oddly enough, Brown comes from a state with state mandated health care that is better than the federal plan.

From where the rest of the civilized world sits, the US does look pretty fucked up these days.

But the Democrats lost this. No one else.
 
The below is from the first page of Google search results on "How many people die from the lack of health insurance" -- way to go Massachusetts voters! The millions of uninsured Americans who will have to die at home when they get symptoms of treatable cancer hope you're very proud of yourselves every time you go to the doctor for a headache or cold.

Study: Lack of Health Insurance Kills 45000 People Annually ...
Sep 18, 2009 ... who die from lack of health insurance every year: about 45000 people. People who die from terrorists acts every year: (from 2001-2003): 870 ...
chattahbox.com/.../study-lack-of-health-insurance-kills-45000-people-annually/ - Cached - Similar

Study links 45000 U.S. deaths to lack of insurance | Reuters
Sep 17, 2009 ... WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Nearly 45000 people die in the United States ... part because they lack health insurance and can not get good care, ...
www.reuters.com › Home › News › Health - Cached - Similar

45000 Die Each Year From A Lack Of Health Insurance - The Fierce ...
Nearly 45000 people die in the United States each year -- one every 12 minutes -- in large part because they lack health insurance and can not get good care ...
crooksandliars.com › Blogs › dday's blog - Cached - Similar

Harvard Medical Study Links Lack of Insurance to 45000 U.S. Deaths ...
Sep 17, 2009 ... The Harvard study found that people without health insurance had a 40 percent .... It's going to hurt us far more if we allow people to die from conditions .... Curious to know how many premature deaths happen in Canada, ...
prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/.../harvard-medical-study-links-lack-of-insurance-to-45000-us-deaths-a-year/ - Cached - Similar

The Raw Story » Study: 45000 Americans die each year for lack of ...
They don't die from lack of INSURANCE. They die from lack of HEALTH CARE. .... Compare that with how many people die in this country every year - less than ...
rawstory.com/.../study-45000-americans-die-each-year-for-lack-of-insurance/ - Cached - Similar

New study finds 45000 deaths annually linked to lack of health ...
Sep 17, 2009 ... “We doctors have many new ways to prevent deaths from hypertension, ... Deaths associated with lack of health insurance now exceed those caused by many ... The CDC tracked study participants to see who died by 2000. ... people who said that their health was fair or poor (126 percent increase), ...
www.harvardscience.harvard.edu/...h...0-deaths-annually-linked-lack-health-coverage - Cached - Similar

45000 People Die Annually From Lack Of Insurance Study Finds
I would like to see research on how many people become disabled, unproductive, and thrown back on social services because of lack of health insurance. ...
www.injuryboard.com/.../45000-people-die-annually-from-lack-of-insurance-study-finds-.aspx?... - Cached - Similar
 
But the Democrats lost this. No one else.

Precisely. And I say this as a life-long Democrat.

They thought they had it in the bag, that it would be a cakewalk.

It never crossed their minds (in Massachusetts or at the White House) that a special election in the middle of January just might need a get out the vote effort, and they never thought about the fact that Republicans (who are outnumbered something like 5 to 1 in Massachusetts) might have the bottled up resentment that encourages people to vote.

It wasn't about health care or any other national issue. It was all about those who felt self-entitled and those who resented them.
 
I certainly do understand, I've even considered it myself. If one wants to leave enough they'll do it at all costs.



Sure it is. It will stop people from bitching, that's for certain...I think we could all use a reprieve on that.

RE: "It will stop people from bitching"

Hmmmmmmmm, I'll have to echo Mikami's sentiments on this, "genius." After 50 million Americans migrate to Canada to escape the incompetence and corruption of our political system, you'd be on JUB bitching every day about the deterioration of services caused by the overcrowding. Again, "genius." :D
 
Overcrowding? You know that Canada is actually larger than the US? Can you find it on a map?

Hahahaha, I was referring to the overcrowding of your "services," such as your health care system. Which is why I used the words, "deterioration of services" in my comment. :D
 
Election over there is like major sport entertainment.
A lot of meaningless hoop blah cheering crowd without much substance.
 
I agree with the OP. Unfortunately there's a lot of truth in what he's saying. Americans are lazy, greedy, want everything but don't want to pay for it. Some man in a suit promises them something and everyone falls all over him. All politicians, Republicans and Democrats are corrupt. They only want to stay in power and will say and do anything for that. .[/quote

I agree with this much of DakotaKen's statement. Too many Americans are lazy and greedy and feel entiled to things they should be working for. They vote with the motivation of "what's in it for me" instead of what is best for everyone.

All politicians are corrupt, yes they seem to be. You are correct that there is little or no difference between a Dem and Repub politician. They are politicians first and foremost, and party members to gain power and favors.

Ever notice how all of the national level politicians complain about the high cost of living in Washington? But they all seem to get very wealthy while living there. I have never heard of one coming home as a papuer.......

I don't understand how anyone can be totally loyal to either party. That is like letting some one else control your vote, party x always has the most qualified , most honest person running in every election at every level of government and they tell you to vote for their man/woman. It just doesn't make sense that either party would have the best person running in every race, every time in every city, county, state and national race.

I much perfer to pick and choose who I think is the best canidate, regardless of which party they may belong to.
 
I heard the news EVEN from Japanese media!!
Which is S$&T.

But I also heard about how unfriendly Martha Coakley and loves Yankees.
And I also have seen Scott Brown's nude pic :)

I can see why...:rolleyes:
 
I agree with the OP. Unfortunately there's a lot of truth in what he's saying. Americans are lazy, greedy, want everything but don't want to pay for it. Some man in a suit promises them something and everyone falls all over him. All politicians, Republicans and Democrats are corrupt. They only want to stay in power and will say and do anything for that. However the Democrats are for the common man while the Republicans are for the rich and corporations.

What I don't understand is why everyone is making a big deal about one Republican being narrowly elected. The headlines and the right wingers are screaming that this is a rejection of the Obama administration and all his plans. No it's not. The Republicans ran a better campaign in Massachusetts, and that's it. All the news people are saying about Republican victories and how Obama is doomed.

Mid term elections..... the ones coming in November..... the other party always comes out ahead. It's not a rejection, it always happens.

RE: "What I don't understand is why everyone is making a big deal about one Republican being narrowly elected."

The issue for me is that unless the Democrats can use some slight of hand trickery to circumvent it, Brown has a good chance of killing health care reform, at least for the foreseeable future. And an estimated 123 Americans are dying every day as a result of being unable to afford the high cost of medical care.

RE: "The Republicans ran a better campaign in Massachusetts"

I agree with you 100%, but my point is that if Massachusetts didn't already have mandatory health insurance, the outcome of the election would have been much different, no matter how much better the Republicans campaign was. Meaning that the health care needs of the MA voters have been taken care of, thus they weren't cutting their own noses off by voting for Brown.

In other words, when they get symptoms of cancer, they can see expensive oncologists and get a diagnosis relatively quickly, and thus get treatment in time to save their lives. So they didn't care that voting for Brown would kill health care reform for everyone else in the country. As long as they can get medical treatment, that's all that matters to them.

But this is not to single them out for being selfish, because again, this blatant degree of selfishness appears to be epidemic among the majority of people who have health insurance. At least that's what I see on their faces when they're shouting down uninsured people at rallies, etc. Personally, I think every insured person who is opposed to uninsured people being covered should have their insurance revoked immediately. Then watch how fast health care reform is passed.
 
I agree with everything the OP has said.

That there are people who are so ignorant as to celebrate this tragedy is all the more unbelievable.

But, then again, here's the health rule in ultra-capitalist U.S.A:

If you don't have money to give to corporations, then your life means nothing. :wave:

(o)
 
The below is from the first page of Google search results on "How many people die from the lack of health insurance" -- way to go Massachusetts voters! The millions of uninsured Americans who will have to die at home when they get symptoms of treatable cancer hope you're very proud of yourselves every time you go to the doctor for a headache or cold.

Study: Lack of Health Insurance Kills 45000 People Annually ...
Sep 18, 2009 ... who die from lack of health insurance every year: about 45000 people. People who die from terrorists acts every year: (from 2001-2003): 870 ...
chattahbox.com/.../study-lack-of-health-insurance-kills-45000-people-annually/ - Cached - Similar

Study links 45000 U.S. deaths to lack of insurance | Reuters
Sep 17, 2009 ... WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Nearly 45000 people die in the United States ... part because they lack health insurance and can not get good care, ...
www.reuters.com › Home › News › Health - Cached - Similar

45000 Die Each Year From A Lack Of Health Insurance - The Fierce ...
Nearly 45000 people die in the United States each year -- one every 12 minutes -- in large part because they lack health insurance and can not get good care ...
crooksandliars.com › Blogs › dday's blog - Cached - Similar

Harvard Medical Study Links Lack of Insurance to 45000 U.S. Deaths ...
Sep 17, 2009 ... The Harvard study found that people without health insurance had a 40 percent .... It's going to hurt us far more if we allow people to die from conditions .... Curious to know how many premature deaths happen in Canada, ...
prescriptions.blogs.nytimes.com/.../harvard-medical-study-links-lack-of-insurance-to-45000-us-deaths-a-year/ - Cached - Similar/QUOTE]


Nothing wrong with a little population control!

RE: "Nothing wrong with a little population control!"

Would you regard it as "population control" if you get cancer after being laid off, and you have no insurance to pay for treatment?
 
Both sides are bad...

...so vote Republican!

And what about small business owners who are now legally required to fund a health care option for their employees? Why is their responsibility to provide for everyone- especially when most of these businesses have been providing liability and workmans comp- the employees are covered while they are at work, if they can't manage to find health insurance elsewhere, why does this fall to the business owners? Shouldn't the industry be expected to subsidize some of this, as they'll be raking in all the profits.

Because the industry doesn't want to, hence why they pay a lot of money to legislators to oppose a bill that would. Of course, the best option would be a single-payer system rather than some kind of half-ass semi-market alternative so that legislators can go on about how totally not socialist they are.

A single-payer system has the main problem of the high initial cost. This wouldn't have been a problem if we hadn't used the economic expansion like a credit card to fund stupid wars. Now we are in a recession and paying for such an overhaul now is near impossible.

To be honest, the biggest reform would be requiring insurance companies to pay up when it's their turn. Their current practice of arbitrarily dropping people because they're sick (pre-existing or otherwise) needs to be banned and severely punished.

Massachusetts voters were acting out of selfish spite.

Yes, spite against Coakley. She didn't even bother campaigning until a week before the election because she assumed she was entitled to the position. She lost for the same reason Hillary Clinton lost. The idea that Massachusetts voters would try to thwart Ted Kennedy's dream simply because they have it already and don't want anyone else to have it is baseless.
 
Careful now, that's not exactly what I meant. Just because both sides are bad doesn't make them equally bad. It's called false equivalence.
 
from the outside watching news report,

the republican party seems mean spirited and un-caring.
Why some americans don't see it that way ?
 
Oh get over yourself. It was a harmless joke.

It's funny that you say the US is doomed according to ignorant masses, but you seem to be a diehard ignorant democrat. The party issues something and you start babbling and nodding your head like another mindless sheep American. Yes, the very kind that doom this country.

As of right now, the bill isn't going to work. It's had too much influence put onto it by the healthcare industry, lobbyists etc.

Don't get me wrong, we need healthcare, but I think we should take a little more time and care and make sure it is done CORRECTLY. Otherwise, will be reforming the health care entirely within another decade.

And where do you get the nerve to say that the Massachusetts voters were acting out of selfish spite? Maybe they were concerned by the economic ramifications of this bill. Maybe they were frustrated with the bill because of the amount of money its going to be funneling towards the private industry.

To quote you "every insured person who is opposed to uninsured people being covered should have their insurance revoked immediately." Well, guess what? "An eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind."


And what about small business owners who are now legally required to fund a health care option for their employees? Why is their responsibility to provide for everyone- especially when most of these businesses have been providing liability and workmans comp- the employees are covered while they are at work, if they can't manage to find health insurance elsewhere, why does this fall to the business owners? Shouldn't the industry be expected to subsidize some of this, as they'll be raking in all the profits.

And, if you've forgotten, we're still in an economic slump. So small businesses, which were already struggling fiscally, are going to face the next few years with an extra financial burden.

Yes. I'm thankful that this bill is being delayed. It's for the greater good in the long run.

RE: "Oh get over yourself. It was a harmless joke."

Oh get over yourself. It was a harmless response to your [STRIKE]callous[/STRIKE] "harmless" joke.

RE: "you seem to be a diehard ignorant democrat. The party issues something and you start babbling and nodding your head like another mindless sheep American"

That's so hilarious I forgot to laugh. You obviously haven't seen my FAQ on the corrupt heath care reform bill:
http://www.justusboys.com/forum/showthread.php?t=293455

Here's some excerpts from it:
"As corruption is so deeply entrenched in our political system, the Washington puppets are willing to take any risks to give the special interest groups what they want. After all, that's who finances their re-election campaigns and provides them with high-paying jobs when they leave office.

That's the main reason Obama caved in to all the demands of the Democrats, etc., because he's obviously fully cognizant of how the corrupt legislative process works."

"If you could see speech bubbles above their heads, they'd all say the same thing, "Until we get everything we want, the uninsured suckers who voted us into office will just have to keep dying."


And you evidently didn't see this comment either:
http://www.justusboys.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5782541&postcount=36

Here's some excerpts from it:
"Generally speaking, the U.S. doesn't have a legitimate government. Instead, it's controlled by two powerful organized crime families called the Republicans and Democrats, who are puppets for special interest groups. Although they've "legalized" the crimes they commit, the sociopathic members are no different than any other organized crime family, in that they have no qualms about treating people in an inhumane manner."

"And while they sit around making corrupt backroom deals to get their pimps everything they want, a planeload of approximately 123 Americans is crashing into cemeteries every day as a result of being unable to afford medical treatment. And who kills people for financial gain other than organized crime families?"


RE: "As of right now, the bill isn't going to work. It's had too much influence put onto it by the healthcare industry, lobbyists etc."

Hahaha, no offense, but don't you think it's extremely naive to expect a corruption free bill from one of the most corrupt governments in the world?

As I stated in my FAQ, "Something bad" is the only thing our elected officials are capable of giving us, period."

RE: "Don't get me wrong, we need healthcare, but I think we should take a little more time and care and make sure it is done CORRECTLY."

As I also stated in my FAQ, "The bottom line is that the American public will either get one of the most corrupt pieces of legislation that's ever been passed, or nothing at all."

In other words, the bill can only get WORSE, especially if the Republicans get their greedy fingers in the pie and add another 10,000 pages of rip-off clauses to it. This is the exact same thing the "real" mafia would do, because they know they've got the threat of death to pressure us with. "Listen up suckers, we've got a deal you can't refuse. You either accept what we give you, or 3,750 of your uninsured friends and relatives will continue to die every month -- and you could be next! All it takes is for you to be laid off and lose your current insurance."

RE: "Maybe they were concerned by the economic ramifications of this bill. Maybe they were frustrated with the bill because of the amount of money its going to be funneling towards the private industry."

I'm sure they were concerned about those issues, as everyone else is. But as I stated in post #21 in this thread, "my point is that if Massachusetts didn't already have mandatory health insurance, the outcome of the election would have been much different, no matter how much better the Republicans campaign was. Meaning that the health care needs of the MA voters have been taken care of, thus they weren't cutting their own noses off by voting for Brown."

What I'm saying here is that most people look out for their own selfish interests first. So if the majority of MA voters had been uninsured, they would have elected any idiot Democrat to avoid having a Republican sabotage health care reform. This is apparently the cost of living in a corrupt democracy, extremely selfish people who have insurance are allowed to sentence 123 uninsured people to die slow, painful deaths each day.

RE: "And what about small business owners who are now legally required to fund a health care option for their employees? Why is their responsibility to provide for everyone- especially when most of these businesses have been providing liability and workmans comp- the employees are covered while they are at work, if they can't manage to find health insurance elsewhere, why does this fall to the business owners? Shouldn't the industry be expected to subsidize some of this, as they'll be raking in all the profits.

And, if you've forgotten, we're still in an economic slump. So small businesses, which were already struggling fiscally, are going to face the next few years with an extra financial burden."


I agree with you 100%, the bill is extremely unfair and corrupt, but that's all you're going to get from an extremely corrupt government that's controlled by special interest groups. Wake up and smell the bullshit. This is the land of the free, where you're free to legally bribe the corrupt "powers that be."

RE: "Yes. I'm thankful that this bill is being delayed. It's for the greater good in the long run"

This brings me back to the original question I asked you. How would you feel if you were diagnosed with cancer after being laid off, and you had no insurance to pay for treatment? Would you want to give a bunch of thieving sociopaths several more years to see if their puppet masters would allow them to make the bill less corrupt? Or would you be willing to accept anything that would enable you to have your cancer treated in the early stages, before it becomes terminal? If it's the latter, then how can you insist on 123 other people dying each day when you're not willing to do it yourself?
 
All chances of anything ever being done have gone out the window, as of today. The Supreme Court decision allowing INFINITE corporate monies into the electoral process, assures for all of eternity that all people running for national office.

All of us are fucked.

I predict 406 Republicans in the House by 2015.

Goodbye capitalism, hello to the most fascist entity in the history of the world.
 
To answer the original question, please see where the US population is more and more getting their faux news from.....

Fox News Ratings Explode On Scott Brown Victory Night

Huffington Post | January 21, 2010 11:34:33
r-HANNITY-BROWN-ELECTION-medium.jpg
Scott Brown's upset of Martha Coakley in Tuesday's Massachusetts special election spelled a major ratings boon for Fox News Channel.

The network saw its biggest night since Election Night 2008, averaging a staggering 6.161 million total viewers in primetime. For comparison, that's almost double CNN (1.503 million total viewers), MSNBC (1.138 million total viewers), and HLN (668,000 total viewers) combined.

Sean Hannity also set a personal record, anchoring his highest rated hour ever. In the 9PM hour (during which Bret Baier cut-in to announce the election results), Hannity averaged 6.809 million total viewers.

For the entire day, Fox News averaged 2.235 million total viewers, again besting CNN (809,000), MSNBC (484,000), and HLN (329,000) combined.

Interestingly, both "Hannity" and "On the Record with Greta van Susteren" (6.399 million total viewers) averaged more than the "Jay Leno Show" on NBC (5.994 million total viewers).

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/blackberry/p.php?id=431478
 
And oddly enough, Brown comes from a state with state mandated health care that is better than the federal plan.

From where the rest of the civilized world sits, the US does look pretty fucked up these days.

But the Democrats lost this. No one else.

A-fuckin'-men!

I'm sure there are many Republicans on JUB. You're reading the text of one.
The US needs to get it's shit together and quit party bashing. Both parties fuck up and neither is to blame completly for the mess we're in. You can't place blame on either party because at all times both parties are represented in the Congress. It's not the complete fault of either party.

Now with Democratic talk of raising the debt ceiling to 14.3 TRILLION.
Okay, first of all. George Bush nearly double the national debt in EIGHT years. From approximately 5.5 trillion at the end of Clintons last term, to approximately 10.3 at the end of Bushs' second. Obama has taken us from 10.3 to 19 trillion in one year and one day. If he continues at this steady pace until he goes up for reelection in 2012... he'll greatly surpass George Bush. Not only might he supass him in the national debt, he also lied when he said he'd revoke the tax laws placed upon the wealthy. He said "we'll let those expire when they were set to".

The Democrats lost this one for themselves. And it's not the Republicans that the Democrats should be mad at. They SHOULD place the blame on themselves, but since they don't seem to want to do that... put it on the Independents if you must. Massachusetts INDEPENDENTS came out in force for Brown. So... don't be hatin' on the Repub's.

That's my $0.02.
 
Back
Top