The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

The Ultimate Slap To Americans' Faces from the uk

Status
Not open for further replies.
and let us not forget about how he feels about people from the southern United States...


I left your misspelling of "animal feed" intact; thought it would be a nice touch.

...was that an iPad boo-boo too?

Yawn. It clearly was a typo. I missed a syllable. As a graduate of a top notch school, I can do that.

This might interest you. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110430233316AAvCRno

Nothing going on over there wherever you're at?

Thanks too for not talking about the issue at hand.
 
So, have I. I mean shit, I remember the ruckus caused by McDonald's moving into Hiroshima, Japan. That was seen as disrespectful and American imperialism. But a british monarch coming to our country on the Fourth of July isn't? That's not disrespectful or inconsiderate?

McDonald's setting up shop in a city we nuked..... I can see how that could be taken as an insult. The point is McDonald's wasn't just stopping in for a visit, they "moved in" (your own words) to stay. It was a we nuked your city, now we're gonna take it over kind of thing. High ranking officials/members of a royal family (think of the term heads of state) coming for a visit, especially around a national holiday, is a sign of respect. They come to PARTICIPATE (watch a parade or two, enjoy some fireworks) in the festivities, not look down their noses at it.

:rolleyes:
 
There are so many inaccuracies here.

The Duke of Cambridge is not the Head of State; he's the Head of State's grandson.

The UK does have a constitution; it just doesn't have one which is written down in one place.

The USA was never part of the British Empire. Certain eastern states were individually British colonies, some of which (eg Virginia and Carolina) were actually named in honour of British sovereigns. Interestingly enough, these states have not been renamed in the 230+ years since independence.

The Duke and Duchess are actually visiting California I believe and that certainly was never part of the British Empire. I hope Lostlover doesn't hear about any visiting Spanish dignitaries. That would really finish him off.

John Adams, the lawyer and United States President who helped to frame the American Constitution, called the British Constitution the most stupendous fabric of human invention in history.

Some parts of the British Constitution are unwritten. However many crucial parts of the Constitution are written down and have been for centuries. They are:
1) Common Law
2) The Coronation Oath
3) The Magna Carta 1215
4) Statute of Westminster 1275
5) The Petition of Right 1628, Declaration of Right and Bill of Rights 1689
6) The Act of Settlement of 1701
7) The Act of Union 1707

For the sake of brevity I will expound, just a little on two of the above:

1) COMMON LAW
Established by Alfred the Great (AD 871- 899) Common Law has been developed by the British people for more than a thousand years. It is common because it applies to everyone equally.

Common Law is grounded in the Ten Commandments and the Golden Rule - treat others as you would be treated. Common Law was developed by British people so they could settle their differences peacefully and fairly.

Common Law incorporates the Charter of Liberties (1100). The Charter makes the Sovereign subject to the law and affirms that no person is above the law. Common Law includes the Council of Westminster (1102), which ended slavery in England. Common Law protects the right established in the Petition of Right (1627) that no person can be arrested for disagreeing with the government. Common Law defends your property rights, your right to self-defence and your right to be secure in your own home - your home is your castle.

Common Law establishes every person's right to a jury trial and the freedom of juries to declare a person innocent. If a jury believes that a person has been charged under an unjust law, it has the right to acquit. For this reason Common Law is superior to the statute law created by Parliament. In the 17th century the Lord Chief Justice ruled that juries have an inalienable right to freely decide guilt and innocence.

Common Law plainly states that judges are to be guided by precedent - the rulings of previous cases. They are not to make up the law. Where there is no precedent, Common Law dictates that decisions must be made according to principles of fairness recognized by Common Law.

Common Law contributes to the prosperity of Britain, the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.

4.The Statute of Westminster, AD 1275, would appear to be the foundational document that established Parliament. With the Sovereign and the Judiciary, Parliament forms the third branch of government. Its political parties, cabinet, prime minister and whips have gradually evolved as hoary traditions.
 
With all due respect, and I mean that, this makes me want to barf. People to people is fine.

Why this week of all weeks in the year? I wish the US would have revoked his visa here and he would have been stuck in Canada.

The people that posted in here in favor of this outdated crap are pathetic. No serious country does this crap except them.

Our 230 year old country has managed to do just fine being independent and free.

Yes we are independent and free. And our President visits other countries, goes to state dinners there and even sometimes reviews their troops. There is quite a bit of pomp and circumstance when a "head of state" (or one acting on his/her behalf) from one nation visits another country. It is considered a sign of respect

As one who supposedly graduated from a top notch school (as you claim) it would be expected of you to have some knowledge of this.
 
No, it isn't.

You really have to move past ascribing negative motives by default to any person or action you do not understand. Hopefully you will learn a little more tolerance when you get older. :rotflmao:

Very good! And trust me, he will get older!:rotflmao:
 
Yes we are independent and free. And our President visits other countries, goes to state dinners there and even sometimes reviews their troops. There is quite a bit of pomp and circumstance when a "head of state" (or one acting on his/her behalf) from one nation visits another country. It is considered a sign of respect

As one who supposedly graduated from a top notch school (as you claim) it would be expected of you to have some knowledge of this.

I remember a recent visit of our President to Great Britain and he was invited to one of those state dinners. Unfortunately he did not read up on British tradition and gave a toast, I believe it was, while the British anthem played. Brernda, may I call her Brenda? Didn't say a word, just let him speak on. That's class.
 
You act like one of those far-left liberals that checks "White/Caucasian" on forms, but you when run into any type of legal trouble all of a sudden they have some "colored" ancestor you want to claim.

Churchill.jpg

This doesn't even get a response past this!
 
Top.

Notch.


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnJnA_mt_UA[/ame]
 
I remember a recent visit of our President to Great Britain and he was invited to one of those state dinners. Unfortunately he did not read up on British tradition and gave a toast, I believe it was, while the British anthem played. Brernda, may I call her Brenda? Didn't say a word, just let him speak on. That's class.

That is actually slap in the face. But yes, to not call him on it, realizing he didn't mean any disrespect shows quite a bit of class.
 
Here's Obama's faux pas:

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNRXGRFJdDY[/ame]

The band knew they should start playing the national anthem as soon as Obama said "Her Majesty the Queen". He should just have said it at the end of his remarks, not the at begining!
 
Yawn. It clearly was a typo. I missed a syllable. As a graduate of a top notch school, I can do that.

This might interest you. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20110430233316AAvCRno

Nothing going on over there wherever you're at?

Thanks too for not talking about the issue at hand.

I'd say it is the issue at hand: you have a habit of picking people to hate on, apart from reason or common sense. You literally do not see or hear the rational things explain to you contrary to your chosen prejudice.

And if being "graduate of a top notch school" is such a wondrous thing, then Bush was a great president.
 
I don't get the big deal. If the entire royaal family wants to come hang out at the whitehouse and celebrate the war of independence it would be okey dokey with me.

They lost the american revolution.

WE are supposed to be the gracious winners and hosts, diplomatically.

Thats not even mentioning the fact that england and canada are our closest allies who have stood with us time and time again.

I hardly see why america has to exclude other nations from our national birthday party, especially those that fight and die alongside us in countless wars around the globe right now.
 
In any given week there are around 170,000 Brits traveling here in the USA while spending over $1.1 billion per week in an economy that desperately needs all the help it can get. I'm sure those Brits would be more than happy to spend their money somewhere else if they are so unwelcome in America certain weeks of the year because of a grudge from 225 years ago.

I've always had a great time when I've been traveling and just so happen to be in a country when a celebration or holiday is going on. The locals shared the history and practices of the holiday, what it meant to them, and gave me a great insight into the culture, all the while having a blast. One of my most favorite travel memories was spending Swiss Day up in Interlocken. The oddest was spending Cinco de Mayo in Portugal at an Irish pub with a bunch of Belgians drinking Czech beer.
 
They're not travelling there to dedicate a statue to George III.
 
It is a right of passage for many Australians to visit Gallipoli in Turkey on Anzac Day - the anniversary of the day Australians first launched on offensive attack in Anzac Cove in WW1. The attack was ultimately a failure, many Australians and Turks died, and Australia retreated. But it was a defining moment in Australia's history, and is celebrated as such.

If Turkey held the view of Lostlover, they would ban Australians from visiting on that day, a day that Australia arrived to kill Turks. But they don't - they celebrate it with us. Because both nations have moved on, have changed and grown. Adults recognise that people, and nations, can grow and mature, admit mistakes, and celebrate the success of those who may have previously been our foes.

Unfortunately, that maturity is nowhere to be seen from Lostlover, who strangely seems to think that Britain is still planning to overthrow his country. Or something.

He also seems strangely oblivious to the fact that the US has more fans of the British Royal Family than Britain has.

Here here! ^^

^ "On her be pleased to pour"...????

The Brits are such closet fetishists. :-)

I think it's just the upper crust English toffs that are in the closet about...everything XD



The best British anthem by far.

No.

I loathe the Brits for their oppression of The Irish

Try, The English. They did it to us Scots too :badgrin:

I don't get the big deal. If the entire royaal family wants to come hang out at the whitehouse and celebrate the war of independence it would be okey dokey with me.

They lost the american revolution.

WE are supposed to be the gracious winners and hosts, diplomatically.

Thats not even mentioning the fact that england and canada are our closest allies who have stood with us time and time again.

I hardly see why america has to exclude other nations from our national birthday party, especially those that fight and die alongside us in countless wars around the globe right now.

Excellent post.

I seriously spent most of this thread wondering what the hell it was about. In saying that, I also learned a few things from the sane posters which was worth it.

I don't get why the OP is so upset about the royals visiting around July 4th. My brother's birthday is July 4th, does that mean he's being inconsiderate to the American celebration of Independance? It's not like Kate and Wills are gonna dress up as Colonial soldiers and spit on your constitution!

Get a life!

I have never been to America but actually love the country from what I've heard. I've met Americans who have all been really great fun to speak with, and I certainly didn't have any emotional meltdowns when Obama visited either #-o
 
[STRIKE]What's a "parliement" and "secondaly"?[/STRIKE] Oh wait, I actually have points to make here. Don't need to harp on the insignificant.

Just remembered you saying we did not have a constitution,then why do we
have a CONSTITUTIONAL Monarch.
LostLover your personal attacks just about say it all.
 
I don't get the big deal. If the entire royaal family wants to come hang out at the whitehouse and celebrate the war of independence it would be okey dokey with me.

They lost the american revolution.

WE are supposed to be the gracious winners and hosts, diplomatically.

Thats not even mentioning the fact that england and canada are our closest allies who have stood with us time and time again.

I hardly see why america has to exclude other nations from our national birthday party, especially those that fight and die alongside us in countless wars around the globe right now.
Thank You so much Boston Pirate :=D::=D::=D::=D::=D::=D:
 
I'd hate to be a monarch and be the constant recipient of insane gossip, assassination attempts from lunatic Irishmen and and ludicrous conspiracy theories from Arizonians.
q-victoria-assassination-attempt.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top