PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
In a series of Situation Room meetings, President Trump weighed his instincts against the deep concerns of his vice president and a pessimistic intelligence assessment. Here’s the inside story of how he made the fateful decision.
The decision by President Trump to give the go-ahead to join Israel in attacking Iran was influenced by a presentation by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in February that led to a series of discussions inside the White House over the following days
The story in the Times made me think upon some elderly people that I've known who were caught up in scams by telemarketers or by some random guy who approached them in a Walmart. This goes beyond the "I believe Putin over US intelligence experts" of the first term. It's a wicked mix of a narcissist who believes that he is always right and someone in the fog of dementia.Netanyahu and Putin have their perfect Patsy and I think that both of them have Kompromat on Trump...as well as a cynical understanding of his deep psychological flaws that they can play like a cheap fiddle.
It's interesting that no one has defined what "open" means.
Either Trump is lying or the 4 other living presidents are, about war on Iran
Twice on Monday, President Donald Trump said he’d wrangled a confession of sorts from an Oval Office predecessor who he said had expressed regret in a private conversation about not attacking Iran the way Trump has been doing for more than two weeks.
But there’s just a little problem: Representatives for the four living former presidents — three Democrats and one Republican — said none have been in touch with Trump recently.
In the times article the intelligence community broke down Netanyahu’s pitch into four parts. First kill the leadership, two prevent Iran’s ability to project power, three wait for the uprising and four regime change. When told only the first two were likely to be successful Trump was fine with that so all this trouble is over killing a leader who was quickly replaced and a missile program that recently has only been used in response to missiles heading their way. Not much of a payoff in my opinion. Further Trump came to believe that Iran would collapse so fast that they wouldn’t have time to close the straight.NY Times story about the "decision making process" on how Trump got us into the war.
In a nutshell, Netayahu made a presentation proposing an attack on Iran. The State Department said, "Not a good idea". The military said, "Israel does this all the time- they come up with harebrained, incomplete plans that they can't do it by themselves. Not a good idea."
Trump went with Netayahu and didn't listen to this own advisors.
![]()
How Trump Took the U.S. to War With Iran
In a series of Situation Room meetings, President Trump weighed his instincts against the deep concerns of his vice president and a pessimistic intelligence assessment. Here’s the inside story of how he made the fateful decision.www.nytimes.com
It's even deeper than that....Lately the more Bibi does the more antisemitism is risings in the world.









