To be gay= exotic?

[Harke the Boeotarch]

Is this cornucopia of boring clichés supposed to mean anything to us?

 

[Ram]

 

[medic1]

Wow how long were you up , maybe you should not drink so much coffee .
I think that if the other guy,s took there time and read the whole long ,very long
yep it is a long thread.
Then maybe you may get somewhere , it is obvious that you have put a lot of time
and effort into this thread.
There lays the problem , it is to long dude .
Between the Full stop,s , exclamation mark,s , past tense , present tense , your
opinion , our opinion , all this and then pre-judge , post-judge , pass sentence .
Way way to long and if i tell it how i see it , then a lot of it look,s like you have just
typed a ton of shi""" stuff from the book. Soz dude

 

[SLOPPYSECONDS]

so

wot ya sayin is

thankyou

 

[MoltenRock III]

Tldr.......

 

[mygaybuffet]

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Same here. Lost & Confused!

 

[Swellegant]

Wow. Just wow. Some interesting premises, but you need to organize your thoughts.

Here's something, though: I believe (though I do not have any relevant studies to back up that belief, only anecdotal evidence and a few educated guesses) that homosexuals know they're homosexual before they're ever sexual. Homosexual children understand that their attractions are for the same sex... but how they manifest that attraction differs case by case.

Child A will comprehend a predilection for mating with a male (I am talking about social and familial mating, not sexual mating) and, looking around himself at the exclusively heterosexual relationships around him (mommy and daddy, grandma and grandpa, play-family toys, family-oriented TV shows, etc.) will surmise that he must be female in order to mate with a male. He then develops and cultivates feminine characteristics.

Child B will manifest the same predilection for same-sex social mating by emulating what he desires, which is male. He develops and cultivates masculinity the same way Child A developed femininity; however, Child B, by conforming to social gender expectations, does not become an outcast the way Child A would; as a result, Child B usually discovers his homosexuality much later than Child A, and has a much harder time coming to terms with it, because he's suddenly facing the ostracism that Child A has become quite accustomed to over the years.

Then there's Child C, who started off as a Child A but had the femininity shamed or beaten out of him by gender-fascist parents. Child C will grow up resembling Child B, but will be a gender-dysphoric wreck on the inside; Child C will also come to loathe Child A for manifesting something that he associates with shame and pain (as might Child B, who has lived in homosocial environments where Child A was ridiculed, and Child B had a hard time coming to terms with his sexuality for fear of that ridicule).

And don't forget Child D, who will have grown up in a home where the heterosexual dichotomy has not been enforced and reinforced, and he grows up without any particular draw toward either masculinity or femininity in his quest for same-sex mating. Child D is the rarest of all rarities, however, since most parents do follow gender stereotypes; and even if the parents don't, the rest of society does. But Child D does exist.

But returning to Children A and B, our major archetypes: they've grown up, and are looking for male mates. Child A is now a big queen, and on the search for a masculine male to create his heterosexual paradigm; Child B is a "regular guy" (if not a macho man) who is not remotely interested in women, he worships the male and has emulated the male, so he wants another masculine man like himself.

Of course, Children A, B, C, and D are continuing to develop as they grow up and grow older, and more complex permutations than can be described in twenty-six letters are going to occur, so it's not like this is the be-all/end-all. But I do think that's how effeminate and masculine archetypes develop in presexual children with homosexual orientations; and judging by the variety of different experiences on which I've based these beliefs, I think I may at least be pointed in the right direction.

Something to think about, anyhow. The book you started us off with probably goes into greater depth with this sort of thing, and is based on a fifteen-year study which is more interested in preventing stress and anxiety in children than with "correcting" their development. It looks like an interesting read.

 

[SLOPPYSECONDS]

it not confusin

because many countrys produce public super Confused
ans

exotic fit many a piss collection many countrys males great
' SHHHHHHHH '
oooooooooooh can say HOMO got nothin do with it?
' yes ya may '
thankyou Is not put lot folk out job across planet?
' many '
ooh is sorry

back ta

females got tits yaknows unless ya born in list a countrys between these a centurys
' ARRRRRRH TITS '
@ ans da happy folk stone her ta death @
arrrrrrrh dat happy endin fa da time
@ go figure @

 

[Telstra]

I'm curious about type C.
I don't understand type C tho.

So type C are straight but want to have sex with men ?

 

[SLOPPYSECONDS]

wot about child U

or Univesial trained twat

why divorce so popular?
' cause FUCKIN MORONS OF EONS KEEP GETTIN BORN '
@ but they come out< pussy! @
' yeah go figure '
@ why not write million books ans make it clear where pussy is ans ho they pop out ? @
' why divorce so popular? '
ooh riiiiight da male is a moron
' no say it out loud they still stonin folk ya know '
@ put stones in ya bra ans whack um back @
' KOOL! '

ha

'

 

[SLOPPYSECONDS]

one thang wot is sad many of taday culturesfolkys

is see a their faces wot sayin theys a discova theys is made up of commercials or whateva mean lot a pap with results at any folks viewins wot not dead farts

one a hope real time worlds amazin great cultures amazin got everythang of everythang sort out da piss of eons wot no ocean cans hold ans now internet 1 drip drip drip

ans internet 2

thankyou

 

[medic1]

Hi joswan
You have taken part of my response to your thread quoted it in reply
to another poster , a genuine mistake or am i reading way to much
into you,r response.
It just looks like the op had posted my quote,and you were thanking him for
the paragraph quoted.
Am happy to say again wow , you have put a lot of time and effort into the thread.
My opinion was that it was to long and that a lot of guy,s would not put the same effort into reading it.
Maybe if you had found a way to split the thread into two or even three seperate
thread,s it may have worked better,i don.t know but i did read it all

 

[SLOPPYSECONDS]

and you Sloppy, thanks to be the 17th poster without substance ^^

was happy ta sub ta ya exotic whateva it is

thankyou