probeteam1
Slut
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2005
- Posts
- 190
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
Uh, yes you are. Your original statement is "tops are men, bottoms are women," followed by the assertion that men who like to get fucked are women inside - which is to say that they possess a female (or at least feminine) internalized gender identity. Your entire argument is based on the idea that sexual role is a proxy for gender. And it's not done very well.First of all, thanks. The paper is due tomorrow, and your inputs are greatly appreciated. In fact, I am going to quote you as counter arguments to my thesis.
I am really not mixing gender and sexuality...well I was till i reached the point of declaring all herms are bis.
I could say the same for people who don't love chocolate and pecans, but I don't go around questioning their humanity.Thanks for catching that emotion thing. I should say desire instead of emotion. They don't have the same desire as we do.
See, this is the sort of thing that is going to blow even more blatant holes in your argument than you already have. You can't just write off all sex that doesn't fit your model as unimportant. You have to know why it's unimportant - and it can't be "because they don't involve penetration," not only because some of them do involve penetration, but also because they still represent articulations of desire and methods of achieving orgasm that fall outside of your current penetration/gender model.All other sex acts are unimportant. It all comes down to penetration.
With the ideas you've presented here, I don't think your paper stands much chance of a passing grade. Or even of getting a grade.


 
						 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		
 
 
		 
		