No, that is just dumb and completely missed the point of what he is saying.
The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums
-
Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community
In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
If you do not have an account, please register.
REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your InfoTo register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
On-Topic Trump Bans Syrian Refugees
- Thread starter rareboy
- Start date
No, that is just dumb and completely missed the point of what he is saying.
kallipolis
Know thyself
^^I am one of the very few posting here who has actually travelled in Muslim countries without fear, knowing that my common sense, and discreet habits ensure that I did not embarrass my sexual partners, or expose me to uninvited trouble.
You really think the ban is about accepting gay people, or you just struggling to excuse the actions of someone who shares most of your prejudices?
They don't even know what they're doing. Heck, let's chuck out the manual on banking and healthcare regulation and let a guy who shouts at the TV when Fox is on fix them.
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Posts
- 118,249
- Reaction score
- 28,040
- Points
- 113
Well, well, well.
Bannon, Miller and Trump have been cock-blocked by the federal courts again.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38872680
Hopefully this will bring an end to trying to rule by presidential decree.
Bannon, Miller and Trump have been cock-blocked by the federal courts again.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38872680
Hopefully this will bring an end to trying to rule by presidential decree.
Or they'll get angrier and even more obtuse. Bullying personalities like to test their boundaries. Sometimes they humiliate themselves.
I don't think anyone support a "religion" here.
They support the people who are innocent and being harass by the US government.
He doesn't understand that the religion is NOT the terrorist. The religion is a victim to the radicals just as much as cities around the world. It is not the refugees who are causing the problem. They're trying to get away from it.
There are more than a few practicing Christians on here.
Please don't intimate what I do and don't understand about religion because you have absolutely no clue. Funny how Christianity is bashed on here at every turn, yet the bible doesn't call for our death, as does islam and the Qur'an.
Stardreamer
auribus teneo lupum
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2010
- Posts
- 5,044
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 38
- Location
- Over the Hedge and Under the Hill
Start quoting the Qur'an to us and we'll happily bash it, its a barbaric religion, but when it comes to people I judge them on their individual behavior. Most Muslims are not actively trying to kill gays.
No, it doesn't, but the Bible DOES 'command' Christians to love their neighbours and don't judge people. That doesn't happen very often from the far-right side of the fence. In fact, the complete opposite happens.
Yes, there are people out there who want to kill us, but judging them and expanding it to the entire religion of over a billion people is ludicrous. It would be like judging you and applying it to everyone in Toronto.
You don't seem to understand that Muslims hate what the extremists are doing just as much as we do. It is not our duty to persecute them for what 'the bad guys' do.
To put in another way. I'm sure you know about Jonestown and Wacko. Suppose the non-Christians judged Christianity by those extremists and demanded that all Christians be exterminated?
And please don't insult me by laughing and saying the comparison is stupid. It is exactly what you are doing against innocent Muslims.
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Posts
- 118,249
- Reaction score
- 28,040
- Points
- 113
^ Actually, the same old testament that Islam is based upon does call for homosexuals to be put to death.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_bibh3.htm
And there are so called 'Christians' who still believe that this should be the case.
It has only been by Christians and progressive Jews rejecting these bronze age attitudes in their scripture that the idea has fallen out of favour.
Every muslim does not believe that homosexuals should be put to death any more than every Christian does.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/hom_bibh3.htm
And there are so called 'Christians' who still believe that this should be the case.
It has only been by Christians and progressive Jews rejecting these bronze age attitudes in their scripture that the idea has fallen out of favour.
Every muslim does not believe that homosexuals should be put to death any more than every Christian does.
^ When I said 'us', I was referring to North Americans, not homosexuals.
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Posts
- 118,249
- Reaction score
- 28,040
- Points
- 113
I was actually referring to the quoted post from Mikey, which seems to betray his lack of understanding of what is actually in his bible....or of the long, hard road that Christianity has had to keep travelling to keep the faith from being overtaken by those who hold the Old Testament above the new.
All muslims may not want to kill gays, Christians, Jews, adulteresses etc but there is now way to separate the good from the bad. And they often become radicalized after they arrive, or their children or grand children. The American people and the president made the decision to exclude them and it is their decision to make.
Please do not speak for Americans like me, thanks.
You and your authoritarian America is disgusting.
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Posts
- 118,249
- Reaction score
- 28,040
- Points
- 113
No. A minority of voters, and the racists Steve Bannon, Stephen Miller and Trump decided this.
And it isn't solely their decision to make.
As they are discovering to their cost.
And where is your evidence for this statement?
By the way, there IS a way to separate the good from the bad. The good are usually running away from the bad. They're called 'refugees'.
Remember a long, long time ago when the United States closed its borders to incoming flights and thousands of American citizens were stranded in Canada? There was a real danger. Through no fault of their own, they were literally refugees. They had nowhere to go. We took them in. We fed them, gave them clothing if necessary, gave them a place to sleep.
And we were doing it again when Trump signed that EO. We were providing Americans and Americans to be and those who were legally in the United States with whatever help they needed simply because they were not allowed to go home.
That's what you do for people who need help.
Wrong. It was a major platform of Trumps campaign and his victory resulted in large part from his position on refugees and immigration. Americans voted for it. Further it was Trumps decision to make as president.
kallipolis
Know thyself
I'd say that Trump's support was the result of him being the anti-establishment candidate, rather than in anything to do with refugees, and immigration.
