Trump Casts Himself As Gay Rights Champion After Orlando Shooting

[Benvolio]

What's this assume part? He knows that's not the policy because it isn't.

You've officially entered the reasoning process of the insane when you claim things that are patently untrue, and then adopt a posture of victimization or oppression or other people being "in on it against you" when they do not accept your insane claims.

It is not parent at all. The reverse is true.

 

[luckynumbah7]

Hey Ben, instead of bringing your wacky 'ole version of rewritten history into the discussion and making it all about your synapses misfiring, howsabout we return this thread to the actual topic? Yes? No? Back to your own personal delusions, then.


....It's just, I think you're missing a prime opportunity to save yourself the trouble. You type the same thing at least every other day, at this point you can just leave a thread title and a post number as an argument and rebuttle. Or maybe you're slightly jealous that people here are paying attention to Trump's 'wisdom' and not your own? Either way, the opportunity to be both brief n'succinct while linking to paragraphs would be so much simpler. Your daily repetition's gotta be contributing to arthritis.

 

[rareboy]

What's this assume part? He knows that's not the policy because it isn't.

You've officially entered the reasoning process of the insane when you claim things that are patently untrue, and then adopt a posture of victimization or oppression or other people being "in on it against you" when they do not accept your insane claims.

Pretty much this, Benvolio.

Your reasoning and manufacturing of 'facts' is often bizarre and paranoid to say the least. It seems that you are the one assigning priorities and motivations in the absence of any actual evidence to support your ravings.

That is indeed the stuff of losing one's grip on fact based reality.

 

[opinterph]

So tell us, do you have any evidence

Better yet, where is your evidence to support this repetition of extreme and outrageous statements that appears intended to serve no purpose other than baiting other forum members?

 

[Benvolio]

Better yet, where is your evidence to support this repetition of extreme and outrageous statements that appears intended to serve no purpose other than baiting other forum members?

I cannot even guess what I have said that you doubt. You cannot seriously doubt that the dems and especially Obams and now Hillary, promote immigration and amnesty. Even the dems on this forum march in lockstep in support of massive immigration. You cannot doubt that dems protect and facilitate abortion. You cannot doubt that immigrants overwhelmingly vote democrat, while whites tend to vote Republican. And you recall Clinton's statements that it will be a good thing when the US has no white majority. You have seen the Vox interview where Obama praised the increasing hodgepodge replacing the American culture, especially where immigrant groups are planted in American communities. I suppose you can convince yourself that the democrats do not intend the inevitable result of their policies, but a more reasonable conclusion is that democrats do intend a Chicago style, one party socialst government for the US.

 

[Kabluey]

I cannot even guess what I have said that you doubt. You cannot seriously doubt that the dems and especially Obams and now Hillary, promote immigration and amnesty. Even the dems on this forum march in lockstep in support of massive immigration. You cannot doubt that dems protect and facilitate abortion. You cannot doubt that immigrants overwhelmingly vote democrat, while whites tend to vote Republican. And you recall Clinton's statements that it will be a good thing when the US has no white majority. You have seen the Vox interview where Obama praised the increasing hodgepodge replacing the American culture, especially where immigrant groups are planted in American communities. I suppose you can convince yourself that the democrats do not intend the inevitable result of their policies, but a more reasonable conclusion is that democrats do intend a Chicago style, one party socialst government for the US.

Somehow voting against things that elderly racists fear leads to:

Tax cuts for the rich
Reduced consumer protection laws
Reduced competition laws that protect smaller companies from large companies
Reduced gay rights
Increased spending on military suppliers
Reduced spending on veterans pensions
Reduced welfare for the elderly and infirm
Reduced funding for schools and education
Reduced spending on maintaining essential infrastructure

So while people might vote because they fear coloured people, in reality the poor and middle class voters are just being led on by people who simply want to act in the interests of the very wealthy.

 

[opinterph]

I cannot even guess what I have said that you doubt.

Well, let’s look at your post – the one I quoted. You seem to be saying … it is okay to be racist, if you are doing so to combat a racism that you perceive is being imposed by elements from within the Democratic Party and/or the federal government. In that regard, you are apparently assuming that “destroy the white majority” is a policy of the Democratic Party.

resisting a racist policy would not be racist.

I wish to see your evidence for each of the following statements:

• Remember, Clinton several times publically said it would be good in the future when the US does not have a white majority.

• Meanwhile, the democrats, especially Obama have pursued a policy of massive immigration and amnesty

 

[Benvolio]

Well, let’s look at your post – the one I quoted. You seem to be saying … it is okay to be racist, if you are doing so to combat a racism that you perceive is being imposed by elements from within the Democratic Party and/or the federal government. In that regard, you are apparently assuming that “destroy the white majority” is a policy of the Democratic Party.

​

I wish to see your evidence for each of the following statements:

• Remember, Clinton several times publically said it would be good in the future when the US does not have a white majority.

• Meanwhile, the democrats, especially Obama have pursued a policy of massive immigration and amnesty

It is not racist to oppose racism, as democrats would have you believe.

Re Obamas policy of massive immigration, it will take a series of posts. First, being steeped in islam per Rev Wright, Obama is on track to admit a million muslims.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...n-cards-people-Muslim-majority-countries.html No, of course it is not a democrats source.

 

[Benvolio]

Here is one of several Bill Clinton speeches applauding the end of the white majority. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?... unite us, or they can weaken and divide us."

 

[Benvolio]

480,000 overstayed their visas last year. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/14/illegal-immigrants-who-overstay-visas-almost-never/
Nonenforcement is part of the Obama plan.

Meanwhile, Obama illegally shields millions from deportation.https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...jb_EK82RMJ-yh8SHFhV62A&bvm=bv.124817099,d.cGc

And invaders surge over the borderhttp://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/17/illegal-families-surge-across-border/
No, these are not democrat sources. How could they be?

 

[Kabluey]

It is not racist to oppose racism, as democrats would have you believe.

Only if you try to frame racists as a threatened majority race.

 

[evanrick]

I dont know what Trump's record is, all I know is that when Bernie was standing up for gay rights, Hillary was still full right wing in her views of gay marriage.

 

[rareboy]

Here is one of several Bill Clinton speeches applauding the end of the white majority. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?...ou look ridiculous with your hyperbolic lies.

 

[rareboy]

It is not racist to oppose racism, as democrats would have you believe.

Re Obamas policy of massive immigration, it will take a series of posts. First, being steeped in islam per Rev Wright, Obama is on track to admit a million muslims.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...n-cards-people-Muslim-majority-countries.html No, of course it is not a democrats source.

This is why you end up looking ridiculous.

Jeremiah Alvesta Wright, Jr. (born September 22, 1941) is a pastor emeritus of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, with a congregation exceeding 6,000.

 

[Benvolio]

Here is the Administration busing illegal in from the borderhttps://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjQws-ix7HNAhVY_mMKHSpiBEgQFggfMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.judicialwatch.org%2Fblog%2F2016%2F06%2Fdhs-quietly-moving-releasing-vanloads-illegal-aliens-away-border%2F&usg=AFQjCNGAO1rMdNkbPKh2S0O-W1aT1EQvOQ&bvm=bv.124817099,d.cGc

 

[Benvolio]

This is why you end up looking ridiculous.

Jeremiah Alvesta Wright, Jr. (born September 22, 1941) is a pastor emeritus of Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, with a congregation exceeding 6,000.

You haven't been paying attention. I have several time given the link to a famous interview of Rev Wright in which he said that when he first met Obama, he was STEEPED IN ISLAM. Asked if he had converted him the Rev could not say.

 

[Benvolio]

Here is another speech by Clinton looking forward to the end of the white majorityhttps://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&ved=0ahUKEwiFxMe9yrHNAhUS-GMKHbPADTEQFghKMAg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freerepublic.com%2Ffocus%2Ff-news%2F2271745%2Fposts&usg=AFQjCNFYWKEY56e0dEfnqyKNRx60N6rpDA&bvm=bv.124817099,d.cGc
"Clinton said by 2050 the U.S. will no longer have a majority of people with European heritage and that in an interdependent world "this is a very positive thing."

 

[Kabluey]

You haven't been paying attention. I have several time given the link to a famous interview of Rev Wright in which he said that when he first met Obama, he was STEEPED IN ISLAM. Asked if he had converted him the Rev could not say.

That's the same reverend who started blaming 'the Jews' for a bunch of stuff shortly afterwards, right?

 

[rareboy]

Here is another speech by Clinton looking forward to the end of the white majorityhttps://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&ved=0ahUKEwiFxMe9yrHNAhUS-GMKHbPADTEQFghKMAg&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freerepublic.com%2Ffocus%2Ff-news%2F2271745%2Fposts&usg=AFQjCNFYWKEY56e0dEfnqyKNRx60N6rpDA&bvm=bv.124817099,d.cGc
"Clinton said by 2050 the U.S. will no longer have a majority of people with European heritage and that in an interdependent world "this is a very positive thing."

So where are the lies?

Although, once again...your posted link doesn't work. What is the problem with you posting hot links?

 

[rareboy]

Here is the Administration busing illegal in from the borderhttps://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjQws-ix7HNAhVY_mMKHSpiBEgQFggfMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.judicialwatch.org%2Fblog%2F2016%2F06%2Fdhs-quietly-moving-releasing-vanloads-illegal-aliens-away-border%2F&usg=AFQjCNGAO1rMdNkbPKh2S0O-W1aT1EQvOQ&bvm=bv.124817099,d.cGc

More non-working links...probably to bullshit right wing conspiracy blog sites that can't post any real 'proof' of the claims they make.