Trump Casts Himself As Gay Rights Champion After Orlando Shooting

[Benvolio]

You forget, that the purpose and effect of the heavy immigration is to give the democrats a one party system. See this: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...ing a governing coalition for the long term.”

 

[Benvolio]

More immigrants means more democrats. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...t8upwLq5PzSYWlqUv6qNgg&bvm=bv.124817099,d.cGc

 

[xbuzzerx]

You forget, that the purpose and effect of the heavy immigration is to give the democrats a one party system. See this: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct...crats must hold the equal and inverse agenda.

 

[Benvolio]

Yes, in general, having people here in this country, who work here, serve in the armed forces, pay taxes, and are actually voting, is what this country is supposed to be all about.

Or have you forgotten that this country exists because it was at one time a place where people were not allowed to vote on the issues that would directly impact them?

That any of this has anything to do with an intentional effort to "destroy whites" or whatever else is a product purely of your own racist convictions. You are projecting the agenda you hold for whites and assuming that liberals and Democrats must hold the equal and inverse agenda.

What i have said is that the purpose and effect of the democrat push of immigration is to destroy the white majority and create a one party system like Chicago, Mexico, Russia etc. with a socialist economy.

 

[xbuzzerx]

What i have said is that the purpose and effect of the democrat push of immigration is to destroy the white majority and create a one party system like Chicago, Mexico, Russia etc. with a socialist economy.

We KNOW you've said it. Many, many, many times.

But you SAYING it doesn't make it true, nor is it true, nor could you possibly prove it to be true because it isn't.

 

[Kabluey]

We KNOW you've said it. Many, many, many times.

But you SAYING it doesn't make it true, nor is it true, nor could you possibly prove it to be true because it isn't.

It does provide insight in to a paranoid, racist personality.
I can't remember people panicked about protecting a white majority. Oh wait, yes I can.

 

[TX-Beau]

I can't believe y'all are still arguing with him.

I have this uncle, who's had a disappointing life, divorced twice, dead end job, ungrateful kids (his own fault) who's certain the horde is responsible for his every woe.

Guess who he's voting for.

 

[opinterph]

@Benvolio

I have only now found time to separate your words from a mangle of random and broken links.

It is not racist to oppose racism, as democrats would have you believe.

Re Obamas policy of massive immigration, it will take a series of posts. First, being steeped in islam per Rev Wright, Obama is on track to admit a million muslims.

No, of course it is not a democrats source.

Here is one of several Bill Clinton speeches applauding the end of the white majority.

In a little more than 50 years, there will be no majority race in the United States. No other nation in history has gone through demographic change of this magnitude in so short a time.

What do the changes mean? They can either strengthen and unite us, or they can weaken and divide us.

480,000 overstayed their visas last year.

Nonenforcement is part of the Obama plan.

Meanwhile, Obama illegally shields millions from deportation.

And invaders surge over the border

No, these are not democrat sources. How could they be?

Here is the Administration busing illegal in from the border

You haven't been paying attention. I have several time given the link to a famous interview of Rev Wright in which he said that when he first met Obama, he was STEEPED IN ISLAM. Asked if he had converted him the Rev could not say.

Here is another speech by Clinton looking forward to the end of the white majority

Clinton said by 2050 the U.S. will no longer have a majority of people with European heritage and that in an interdependent world "this is a very positive thing.

In addition to immigrants, Obama brings in millions on work permits and allows them to stay.

Here is another link quoting Clintons famous speech praising the end of the White majority.

Here is Obama busing illegals into the country.

Here is Hillary's plans for even more illegal immigration and amnesty.

Thank you. My xxxx iMac does not leave that space and I did not realize the problem. It does not cut and past in the usual sense.

No, amnesty is a given, then path to citizenship. Amnesty occurs when the administration does not deport them.
Worse, the democrat plans seem clearly designed to facilitate voting by non citizens.

To encourage more minor illegals, Obama spends spends money on benefits for them

Obama spends #20,000 on each of his "refugees"

And, they receive welfare for years. You can be sure they will vote democrat asap.

If you google any one of my points you will find multiple sources. I choose without the benefit of your Index of Forbidden Works.

You miss the point that the democrats policy is racist. Is is racist for Clinton to say it will be good when there is no white majority. It is racism to swamp the electorate with immigrants to control the vote.

If you had been in Nazi Germany, you would have labeled the Jewish people as racist for resisting the holocaust. And yes, more Americans have been aborted by the democrats than were killed in the holocaust. Both policies are genocide.

Here is yet another source for Clintons racist speech.

Now i have attempted to answer your questions, although hundreds of sddirional items could be presented. Now let me ask one question: if the leaders of the democrat party pursued a policy of large immigration for the purpose of destroying and outvoting the white majority,would that not be a racist policy?

You are not an impartial judge. We know from experience that you never accept a source which disagrees with you. Searching for unimpeachable sources is not worthwhile.The real question is whether Clinton said it, not what this source is. Both his statements are reported multiple times.

That should be additional items.

You forget, that the purpose and effect of the heavy immigration is to give the democrats a one party system. See this:

Obama crony and former SEIU Vice President Eliseo Medina has the best look into the mindset of liberal lawmakers when it comes to immigration laws, or the lack thereof.

Medina previously served as a member of Obama’s National Latino Advisory Council and as honorary chair of the Democratic Socialists of America. As such, he used the platform of an America’s Future Now! Conference in 2009 to outline a plan for long-term Democrat rule through blanket amnesty.

“We reform the immigration laws; it puts 12 million people on the path to citizenship and eventually voters. If we have eight million new voters who care about, and will be voting, we will be creating a governing coalition for the long term.

More immigrants means more democrats.

What i have said is that the purpose and effect of the democrat push of immigration is to destroy the white majority and create a one party system like Chicago, Mexico, Russia etc. with a socialist economy.

 

[LittleDove]

Whereas you and your white sheeted friends ...

There's another recent thread where the connexion is made much more explicit.

In a series of successive posts, he inveighed against those he saw as causing America's problems.

First it was the turn of the Jews. Following that, the Roman Catholics were brought to notice. Then he moved on to those pesky immigrants. The series reached its conclusion by rambling on to the subject of those whose skin is other than a whiter shade of pale.

It was really quite amazing, in a pathological kind of way. It was like watching someone use the agenda from a local Klan meeting as a memorandum to order his posts, and make sure nothing was forgotten. The only thing missing was an invitation to the next cross-burning.

 

[rareboy]

It is why I quoted all the material that I did from the source he cited for his delusional interpretation of Bill Clinton's speech in post #48. These ultra right wing-nut sites are either the only opinions Benvolio is listening to...or he is one of the faithful and is reciting this catechism when he's not taking every thread on this forum off topic.

The Klan and Stormfront have been diligent though in trying to train their flock to use non-threatening language in public in order to keep from being booted out of other forums. Even on their own sites they try to get their rag-tag band of haters to represent the issue as the poorly educated anglo-euro protestant white males as the real victims in society.

So this is what they use instead.

So inclusiveness and diversity always becomes a racist attack against the 'White Majority'....even when it is whites who are promoting the benefits of more inclusion and diversity.

Abortion is a big issue for them as well...not because they really care about fetuses...but because too many white women are not replenishing the white race in the US.

 

[Benvolio]

The fact remains that Clinton at least twice said that the end of the white majority will be a very good thing.

 

[xbuzzerx]

The fact remains that Clinton at least twice said that the end of the white majority will be a very good thing.

Clinton herself being decidedly white is a curious person to accuse of wanting to exterminate the white race. She also failed to force her daughter Chelsea to abort her child. So she's doing a rather poor job for the cause, wouldn't you say?

 

[Benvolio]

Well, let’s look at your post – the one I quoted. You seem to be saying … it is okay to be racist, if you are doing so to combat a racism that you perceive is being imposed by elements from within the Democratic Party and/or the federal government. In that regard, you are apparently assuming that “destroy the white majority” is a policy of the Democratic Party.

​

I wish to see your evidence for each of the following statements:

• Remember, Clinton several times publically said it would be good in the future when the US does not have a white majority.

• Meanwhile, the democrats, especially Obama have pursued a policy of massive immigration and amnesty

Clinton herself being decidedly white is a curious person to accuse of wanting to exterminate the white race. She also failed to force her daughter Chelsea to abort her child. So she's doing a rather poor job for the cause, wouldn't you say?

The plan is not, I assume, to exterminate the whites, that is your word. The plan is to eliminate the white majority because they tend to vote Republican, and to create a permanent democrat majority, as in Chicago.

 

[kallipolis]

The plan is not, I assume, to exterminate the whites, that is your word. The plan is to eliminate the white majority because they tend to vote Republican, and to create a permanent democrat majority, as in Chicago.

Conspiracy theories are all very well, but I would hazard a guess that your theorising needs some supporting evidence...apart from your easy willingness to provide us with conspiracy theories that lack any foundation in fact.

Your opinions are always worth noting, for being your well rehearsed prejudices.

 

[xbuzzerx]

The plan is not, I assume, to exterminate the whites, that is your word. The plan is to eliminate the white majority because they tend to vote Republican, and to create a permanent democrat majority, as in Chicago.

Oh you've used that precise word many times. That Democrats aim to propagate the birthing and the amnesty of millions of nonwhites and support abortion only as a way to prevent white people from reproducing and fill the country with mud people.

But moving on...

It's interesting that you tie the mere existence of nonwhite voters as something bad for the Republican party and, instead of recognizing that this probably signifies some problems the Republican Party has with racism and inclusion for nonwhites, you instead insist the only possible intepretation is an irrational hatred of whites or a wish to exterminate whites onto anyone who supports inclusivity or diversity.

 

[Benvolio]

Oh you've used that precise word many times. That Democrats aim to propagate the birthing and the amnesty of millions of nonwhites and support abortion only as a way to prevent white people from reproducing and fill the country with mud people.

But moving on...

It's interesting that you tie the mere existence of nonwhite voters as something bad for the Republican party and, instead of recognizing that this probably signifies some problems the Republican Party has with racism and inclusion for nonwhites, you instead insist the only possible intepretation is an irrational hatred of whites or a wish to exterminate whites onto anyone who supports inclusivity or diversity.

You lie. I have never used the word exterminate or any equivalent. I challenge you to pruduce a single time i have said that. My objection to immigration is that it aggravates every problem ee have; poverty, unemploment, low wages, crime, the environment, education etc. worse, the vote democrat for socialism, welfare, class hatred, racial hatred, confiscatory taxes.

 

[kallipolis]

You lie. I have never used the word exterminate or any equivalent. I challenge you to pruduce a single time i have said that. My objection to immigration is that it aggravates every problem ee have; poverty, unemploment, low wages, crime, the environment, education etc. worse, the vote democrat for socialism, welfare, class hatred, racial hatred, confiscatory taxes.

The WASPs have been saying this since the foundation of the republic. In fact the WASPs were saying just this when the New England colonies were in conflict with France, for those Frenchies were not good British Protestant stock.

Immigration has transformed the USA into the most successful economy on this planet.

 

[Benvolio]

The WASPs have been saying this since the foundation of the republic. In fact the WASPs were saying just this when the New England colonies were in conflict with France, for those Frenchies were not good British Protestant stock.

Immigration has transformed the USA into the most successful economy on this planet.

It is bad logic to say that immigration was good 200 years ago, so it is good now. We no longer have the frontier to extend accross the nation. We no longer are have the fastest growing heavy industries in the world. Even then, the effect of immigration and resulting discrimination was to keep the blacks on the bottom and still does.
No the great economy was the result of the institutions we were born with: representative democracy, economic freedom ,a strong innovative culture, the protestant work ethic. Immigrants at first were northern Europeans who assimilated well. Immigrants generally have provided labor and innovation within the institutions, but the important point is that the greatness came from the institutions, not from immigration.
Now immmigrants tend to vote against the institutions which create the opportunities; voting democrat against free enterprise, for welfare and give aways, for confiscatory taxes, for total regulation. They want socialism which has always before been a dirty word in America.

 

[kallipolis]

It is bad logic to say that immigration was good 200 years ago, so it is good now. We no longer have the frontier to extend accross the nation. We no longer are have the fastest growing heavy industries in the world. Even then, the effect of immigration and resulting discrimination was to keep the blacks on the bottom and still does.
No the great economy was the result of the institutions we were born with: representative democracy, economic freedom ,a strong innovative culture, the protestant work ethic. Immigrants at first were northern Europeans who assimilated well. Immigrants generally have provided labor and innovation within the institutions, but the important point is that the greatness came from the institutions, not from immigration.
Now immmigrants tend to vote against the institutions which create the opportunities; voting democrat against free enterprise, for welfare and give aways, for confiscatory taxes, for total regulation. They want socialism which has always before been a dirty word in America.

That's your belief, not reality.

Count the number of Republican administrations since 1945, and then let us know whether your spurious speculation is founded on fact.

 

[xbuzzerx]

No the great economy was the result of the institutions we were born with: representative democracy, economic freedom ,a strong innovative culture, the protestant work ethic. Immigrants at first were northern Europeans who assimilated well.

The Benvolios of the time patently disagreed, they even disagreed in many instances that these people were even white or European, no matter how much we find that concept silly today, or would ever be capable of assimilation. And they were ignored just as you should be.