The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Humor-Satire Trump Staff Picks, Co-Conspirators and the Revolving Door of Departures [2024 Edition]

But Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh still became SC justices.

Sexual assault doesn't seem to be an obstacle.
 
bendted said:
I have 3 questions.

1) Will his side chick, Laura Loomer, be involved in this administration? I'm thinking an advisory role, behind the scene,of course.

2) Who will be the token black? Kind of how Ben Carson was installed in an unsexy position, HUD which is largely invisible, rarely makes news and no one cares much what they do, but hey, they have a black guy.

3) How to repay Lindsey Graham? Well, aside from keeping his "secret" safe. He's one of the MAGA tribe's biggest dick riders after all...I'm thinking
Whitehouse men's room attendant would be most appropriate.
Click to expand...
Expect Loomer to be pretty much invisible if Melanoma isn't in residence.

I still expect Hershel Walker or some other black dude to be nominated for Department of Ed with the express direction to destroy it.

As for Lindsey, it will all hinge on his usefulness to Trump, but more to Trump's owners. As long as he toes the line, they will keep him in the forefront of surrogates and Trumpsplainers. I am sure that there is already a White House glory hole that has been installed for him.
 
rareboy said:
It is an open secret that Gabbard is a Kemlin asset since 2016. And her repetition of Kremlin propaganda and appearances on Kremlin TV propaganda shows should have disqualified her right away from any position, let alone Director of National Intelligence.

Shows how far the US has actually sunk.
Click to expand...
And the media leaks from those who have their knives out have begun. Gabbard better put on her big girl panties because it's about to get rough. ;)


View attachment CNN Politics-Why critics say Gabbard is a controversial choice for spy chief-480p.mp4
 
rareboy said:
I still expect Hershel Walker or some other black dude to be nominated for Department of Ed with the express direction to destroy it.
Click to expand...
What? That leave Tommy Tuberville just the Director of the CIA?
 
KaraBulut said:
There was a humorist who used to be featured on 60 Minutes by the name of Molly Ivins. Molly was from Texas and she used to refer to Texas as "The National Laboratory for Bad Government".

In Texas, there's a war underfoot in the state Capitol. A Democrat hasn't held state-wide office since 1994. It's a one-party State. For years, the business lobby (aka the "Chamber of Commerce" faction) in the Republican Party poured millions into the Texas Republican Party in order to get Republicans into power. About 8 years ago, the Republicans turned on them. There's a civil war going on in Texas between the old-time business-oriented Republicans and the MAGA crowd that is funded by a handful of White Christian Nationalist billionaires.

Similar things are happening in Florida. No one would have guessed that a weak governor like Ron DeSantis would have said, "Fuck you" to Disney, one of the State of Florida's largest employers. It's the same phenomenon: the Republican Party turning on the companies that help put it into power.

View the lunacy in the appointment process as part of a nationalized Republican civil war. It's a war between the business lobby in the Republican Party and the Tea Party/MAGA insurgency that has taken over the Republican Party (and made it a branch of the Trump Organization). It's a war between MAGA and the Reagan-Bush factions of the Party. It's a war between the Republican Senators and the Republican House Freedom Caucus. Trump's strategists is setting up a loyalty test in order to set up a primary purge of any Republican who won't blindly do what he wants. It's what happened in 2018 with old-line business conservative Republicans like Bob Corker (R-TN) and Jeff Flake (R-UT).

If the Republican Senators don't stand up to Trump, they will lose the power granted to them by the Constitution to control the Executive.
Click to expand...
Perhaps unironically, both parties are suffering from the thin cord of identity. Republicans sacrificed so much of their former platforms to back Trump and the margin of fundamentalists and crazies. Democrats sold their soul to become the party of anti-racism to the degree that they took for granted the very races they claimed to represent, not to mention ignored the huge sexism present in working class Blacks and Latinos.

Thus we have a deposed Democrat president who didn't speak for much of the "Democratic" population, and soon to be, a Republican president who will have no place to turn to keep his constituents behind his administration. Add to that the worst rogue's gallery since Teapot Dome, and it's going to be a countdown to self-immolation.

If anything, this has the potential to play into the reform we all need, centrism. We'll see. I heard Senator Chris Murphy already signalling a move to center.
 
NotHardUp1 said:
...If anything, this has the potential to play into the reform we all need, centrism. We'll see. I heard Senator Chris Murphy already signalling a move to center.
Click to expand...
Several members of the left flank of the Democratic Party have made some very interesting statements about the results.

AOC noted that she won in her district with voters who also voted for Trump; she asked them "Why?", which is what any smart politician should be doing.

Ritchie Torres gave some interviews where he distinguished between mainstream Democratic positions versus some of the more strident voices coming out of Twitter and TikTok and how those voices gave a cudgel to the lie factory that was the Trump campaign.


Every Democratic friend that I have said that "Defund the Police" was the stupidest slogan they had ever seen. Yet, the Democratic message operations could never find the right way to say, "Fund the police to do police things; but let's get the police out of the social work business by funding mental health care". The best messaging was coming from Tim Walz when he said things like, "Democrats believe that people should mind their own business".

The Democrats should have learned from the 2020 campaign that they can't have it both ways; their platform is clear but too many Democratic candidates listen to consultants who tell them to try to appease everyone in the party. Democrats lost because they didn't communicate with the public about what was happening with the economy. But politics is a game of addition and they didn't add any voters by being wishy-washy on fringe issues like transpeople in sports (of which there are very few but Republicans spent over $200 million scaring the public to believe it was ubiquitous).
 
KaraBulut said:
The Democrats should have learned from the 2020 campaign that they can't have it both ways; their platform is clear but too many Democratic candidates listen to consultants who tell them to try to appease everyone in the party. Democrats lost because they didn't communicate with the public about what was happening with the economy. But politics is a game of addition and they didn't add any voters by being wishy-washy on fringe issues like transpeople in sports (of which there are very few but Republicans spent over $200 million scaring the public to believe it was ubiquitous).
Click to expand...
The math has backfired on the progressives. In an attempt to better justify the attention on LGBTQ issues, there has been an unsubtle effort to exaggerate numbers, especially when trans becomes the topic, and it was easily seen as an opportunity by the right to use for attack.

It has been a misguided attempt by LGBTQ constituents to reduce the sense of abnormality (statistically) of our members, whereas the truth is, civil rights are absolutes, regardless of percentages, just like no torture of prisoners, just like no influence peddling to the SCOTUS, just like no human trafficking.
 
Blah blah blah blah blah

Nothing matters. The US just wouldn't elect a blk female candidate as Prez, Ever.

Less than 1.7% on the pop vote?

The US system is as broken as it gets.

But enjoy the ride the ride to the basement.
 
Of course. We'll only elect goose-stepping Nazis and will approve infanticide for babies with the "gay gene" and will drill until we reach China.

Good examples have already been given aboutt why blaming the loss on sex and race is just ignoring the reality of there being MANY reasons why Harris lost. Trump is a monster, so Americans indeed deserve whatever befalls now.

The forum isn't a forum for discussion when it presents valid arguments against the monotone. Let's just dismiss anything inconvenient, and true, with crankiness and dismissive rhetoric.

Need to rant a lot. We're in the ranting room apparently.
 
rareboy said:
Nothing matters. The US just wouldn't elect a blk female candidate as Prez, Ever.
Click to expand...
They almost did, though. The margins were much closer than Trump is going to claim. His surrogates are running around saying, "The American voters have given him a mandate." Trump barely cleared 50% in five of the seven battleground states. That's not a mandate.

Harris got tagged with a shitty economy and a gross mismanagement of messaging on issues like the border. If the White House communications team and Biden would have gotten in front of messaging these issues and looking like they were doing something about them (appearances are everything), Harris might have pulled this off.

1731889797584.png
 
KaraBulut said:
They almost did, though. The margins were much closer than Trump is going to claim. His surrogates are running around saying, "The American voters have given him a mandate." Trump barely cleared 50% in five of the seven battleground states. That's not a mandate.

Harris got tagged with a shitty economy and a gross mismanagement of messaging on issues like the border. If the White House communications team and Biden would have gotten in front of messaging these issues and looking like they were doing something about them (appearances are everything), Harris might have pulled this off.

View attachment 2786091
Click to expand...

Democrats didn't "get it", and still don't "get it" on the economy.
 
NotHardUp1 said:
Of course. We'll only elect goose-stepping Nazis and will approve infanticide for babies with the "gay gene" and will drill until we reach China.

Good examples have already been given aboutt why blaming the loss on sex and race is just ignoring the reality of there being MANY reasons why Harris lost. Trump is a monster, so Americans indeed deserve whatever befalls now.

The forum isn't a forum for discussion when it presents valid arguments against the monotone. Let's just dismiss anything inconvenient, and true, with crankiness and dismissive rhetoric.

Need to rant a lot. We're in the ranting room apparently.
Click to expand...


Nothing seems to have been learned. This thread proves that. Living in bubbles is no way to live.
 
KaraBulut said:
... It's a war between the business lobby in the Republican Party and the Tea Party/MAGA insurgency that has taken over the Republican Party (and made it a branch of the Trump Organization). It's a war between MAGA and the Reagan-Bush factions of the Party...
Click to expand...
The cracks are starting to appear.

In the Senate last week, there was a heated exchange between Thom Tillis [R-NC] and Rand Paul [R-KY] over disaster relief for hurricane Helene. Helene caused about $53 billion in damage in Western North Carolina. The Tillis bill would have added $550 million to fund the Small Business Adminstration's Disaster Loan Program Account to help businesses in North Carolina.

Rand held up the bill because he wanted to repeal some of Biden's initiatives from the Inflation Reduction Act to offset the $550 million. Of note, Sen Paul did not use this logic when Kentucky was hit by catastrophic tornadoes a few years back. It's a sign of things to come, as things that are normal order in the business faction of the Republican Party are opposed by the far right MAGA wing of the party.

Around 13:00 mins in, Paul tries to amend the bill to pull the fund out of Biden's programs. The nastiness begins around 20 mins in.



One of Trump's nominations is already having trouble. Pete Hegseth was accused of sexual assault in 2017. Hegseth was married to Samantha Deering in 2017 (his second of 3 wives that the 44 year old Hegseth has had). Hegseth was a speaker at an event in Monterey, California for the California Federation of Republican Women. Hegseth admits that he had sex with the woman but that the encounter was consensual. The woman went to police alleging that the incident was not consensual (the woman's husband and children were also staying at the hotel).

The story behind the alleged assault is even more bizarre. According to reports, Hegseth was in the hotel bar and was pressuring two women to go upstairs to his room. One of the women sent a text to the alleged victim, asking her to help them escape from Hegseth's pressure. The alleged victim went to talk to Hegseth, so that the two women could sneak away from the bar. The alleged victim said she was having a drink with Hegseth and she blacked out. The next thing that she remembers is waking up having sex with Hegseth in his room. The implication is that Hegseth may have put something into her drink. Because the woman waited several days to report the assault, it is unlikely that drug screens would have found any date rape drugs.

Hegseth's attorney says that the alleged assault was a consensual encounter but Hegseth paid a settlement to the woman in exchange for a non-disclosure agreement and her agreement not to pursue sexual assault charges against him.

Mainstream press reports say that Trump is standing behind Hegseth, even though this will be the THIRD Trump nominee with sexual impropriety allegations.
President-elect Donald Trump’s defense secretary pick, Pete Hegseth, paid a woman who accused him of sexual assault in a settlement agreement that included a confidentiality clause, according to Hegseth’s attorney.

Attorney Timothy Parlatore said Hegseth denies assaulting the woman and has characterized the October 2017 incident in Monterey, California as a “consensual sexual encounter.”
Click to expand...

The right wing Press is publishing stories talking about Hegseth's plan to "undo DEI training" at the Pentagon. No mention of the elephant in the room.
www.foxnews.com

Pentagon bracing for sweeping changes after Trump nominates Pete Hegseth for secretary

The Pentagon is bracing for sweeping policy changes under the incoming Trump administration, and some high-level officers could find their careers on the chopping block.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
 
I would think that have at least one sexual assault allegation or shooting a defenceless pet would be prerequisites for being selected for a position by Trump.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top