The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Trump Staff Picks, Co-Conspirators and the Revolving Door of Departures

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Trump Staff Picks

Correct...

James Comey informed Congress that a review of new emails found in relation to the FBIs investigation into HRCs use of a private email server had not yielded any reason for charges against the Democratic presidential nominee.

No he found she had been "extremely careless" in handling classified information . Under the statute "intentional or grossly negligent" handling is a crime. He did not explain why he did not prosecute. Lawyers scoff at any pretended difference between extremely careless and grossly negligent.
 
No he found she had been "extremely careless" in handling classified information . Under the statute "intentional or grossly negligent" handling is a crime. He did not explain why he did not prosecute. Lawyers scoff at any pretended difference between extremely careless and grossly negligent.

Funny how Ben slips into talking about lawyers in the third person when he's talking about things that he'd like to believe are the law.
 
Re: Trump Staff Picks

To avoid the continued promulgation of inaccurate information, the actual 5-Jul-2016 statement by Comey can be found on the FBI website.

As a point of reference, the DOJ/FBI generally only comments when evidence supporting prosecution is found. The act of making a statement about a non-prosecution is, in itself, unprecedented and reflects the political nature of the investigation.

Anyway, here's the actual substance of the Comey statement (I added bolding to emphasize the key parts):

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case...

In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.

...let me tell you what we found:

Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information...

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail.

Separately, it is important to say something about the marking of classified information. Only a very small number of the e-mails containing classified information bore markings indicating the presence of classified information. But even if information is not marked “classified” in an e-mail, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.

He specifically quantified the number of emails (30,000+) and the small number of chains (52) of that group that contained classified information, including how many were top secret (8):
From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. Separate from those, about 2,000 additional e-mails were “up-classified” to make them Confidential; the information in those had not been classified at the time the e-mails were sent.

He also specifically called out accusations about "deleted emails":
I should add here that we found no evidence that any of the additional work-related e-mails were intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them. Our assessment is that, like many e-mail users, Secretary Clinton periodically deleted e-mails or e-mails were purged from the system when devices were changed. Because she was not using a government account—or even a commercial account like Gmail—there was no archiving at all of her e-mails, so it is not surprising that we discovered e-mails that were not on Secretary Clinton’s system in 2014, when she produced the 30,000 e-mails to the State Department.

Your tax dollars at work:
The government hasn't disclosed how much was spent on these investigations. One of the reasons that it is difficult to put a price tag on the investigations is that the "email" investigation was actually an outgrowth of the Benghazi investigation. There were nine Benghazi investigations. The Democratic minority on one of those committees has a counter website that estimates the cost of one of these investigations at about $8.7 million dollars.

A conservative think tank estimated that it took about $20 million to review the emails.

FYI: the annual salary for the US Secretary of State is $186,600.
 
Re: Trump Staff Picks

To avoid the continued promulgation of inaccurate information, the actual 5-Jul-2016 statement by Comey can be found on the FBI website.

As a point of reference, the DOJ/FBI generally only comments when evidence supporting prosecution is found. The act of making a statement about a non-prosecution is, in itself, unprecedented and reflects the political nature of the investigation.

Anyway, here's the actual substance of the Comey statement (I added bolding to emphasize the key parts):





He specifically quantified the number of emails (30,000+) and the small number of chains (52) of that group that contained classified information, including how many were top secret (8):


He also specifically called out accusations about "deleted emails":


Your tax dollars at work:
The government hasn't disclosed how much was spent on these investigations. One of the reasons that it is difficult to put a price tag on the investigations is that the "email" investigation was actually an outgrowth of the Benghazi investigation. There were nine Benghazi investigations. The Democratic minority on one of those committees has a counter website that estimates the cost of one of these investigations at about $8.7 million dollars.

A conservative think tank estimated that it took about $20 million to review the emails.

FYI: the annual salary for the US Secretary of State is $186,600.

But, you omitted this part:
"Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities."

So, yes it is against the law to mishandle in a "grossly negligent" which legally is no different from "extremely careless", so yes, she did break the law and there was no explanation why she was not prosecuted for it.
 
Re: Trump Staff Picks

Today...Mr Wilber Ross...CoalMinegazi...12 DEAD AMERICANS!!!!!

I hope I don't offend any righties and Hillary haters but you really should learn to eat your own shit....
 
Re: Trump Staff Picks

But, you omitted this part:
"Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way, or a second statute making it a misdemeanor to knowingly remove classified information from appropriate systems or storage facilities."

So, yes it is against the law to mishandle in a "grossly negligent" which legally is no different from "extremely careless", so yes, she did break the law and there was no explanation why she was not prosecuted for it.

Jesus Christ.

Can't you fucking read?

They determined it hadn't been handled in a grossly negligent way which is why there were no charges to bring...no law broken.

There is a world of difference between Extremely careless and grossly negligent which a real lawyer would understand.

You just keep making shit up.
 
Re: Trump Staff Picks

Well this made me throw up my frogs legs....

8ab7efa927b1470f8c5d139b5f8eea59_18.jpg



Having forced all the other Republicans to eat his shit....Trump served Romney Crow at their intimate dinner.

Another capitulation.

Hopefully Romney gags every time he thinks of this dinner until the day he dies.

Is there not one Republican left with the integrity of their convictions?

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/...tary-state-praises-trump-161130035208102.html
 
Re: Trump Staff Picks

Today...Mr Wilber Ross...CoalMinegazi...12 DEAD AMERICANS!!!!!

I hope I don't offend any righties and Hillary haters but you really should learn to eat your own shit....

Hopefully they choke on it as well.
 
Re: Trump Staff Picks

^ Yeah...nothing like having BIG COAL represented by the Secretary of Commerce.

Get ready for a big push on coal powered cars and the abolition of the EPA.

Maybe he'll create a new coal oil lamp industry.
 
Re: Trump Staff Picks

He's picking billionaires to deregulate the banks again should be a wild ride before it all falls again lol
To the Bernie morons who thought trump would do what Bernie would do to the bankers that destroyed the economy in 2007---:rotflmao:
 
Re: Trump Staff Picks

^ I am meeting with my financial advisors on Monday to plot out a strategy....everything he's promising to do is going to crash the US economy within four years.

So I want to figure out how to make out like a bandit while he and his cronies build the bubble and how to pull out this time ahead of the great crash.
 
Re: Trump Staff Picks

He's picking billionaires to deregulate the banks again should be a wild ride before it all falls again lol
To the Bernie morons who thought trump would do what Bernie would do to the bankers that destroyed the economy in 2007---:rotflmao:

There are Bernie supporters that thought this? Unless you mean the Bros which I wouldn't consider them legit supporters of his.
 
Re: Trump Staff Picks

Recapping for those keeping score:
  • Commerce Secretary: Wilbur Ross, a former investment banker . Met Trump decades ago while advising Trump’s companies on bankruptcy. Major investor in coal and steel companies. Est net worth at $2.9 billion.
  • Deputy Commerce Secretary: Todd Ricketts, member of one of the richest families in America. Co-owner of the Chicago Cubs. Son of Ameritrade founder and billionaire Joe Ricketts. Estimate of the Ricketts' family wealth $1 billion.
  • Secretary of Education: Betsy DeVos, Amway Corporation heir - family’s wealth estimated at $5.1 billion.
  • Secretary of State: Mitt Romney, Founder of Romney founded Bain Capital, his personal fortune is estimated at between $250 million and $1 billion.
  • Secretary of the Treasury: Steven Mnuchin, former Goldman Sachs partner made his fortune from a takeover of a failed mortgage lender, Indymac, that he sold at a $5 billion net profit for Mnuchin and his partners.
 
Re: Trump Staff Picks

^ But all of his trailer dwelling, knuckle dragging, poorly educated supporters from Bumfuck, Pennsyltucky are chubbing up thinking that TrumpCo. is going to share the pie.


:rotflmao:
 
Re: Trump Staff Picks

The last person in charge of all those offices was a"comunity organizer", lol,lol. Anything will be an improvement.
 
Re: Trump Staff Picks

The last person in charge of all those offices was a"comunity organizer", lol,lol. Anything will be an improvement.

Too bad you can't say what you would really like to say..eh?
 
The last person in charge of all those offices was a"comunity organizer", lol,lol. Anything will be an improvement.

And a Nobel Peace Prize recipient, an alma mater of Occidental College, Columbia, magna cum laude of Harvard University Law School and teacher of constitutional law at Chicago University.

But ignorant fucks don't care about any of that.

Much better a clown who inherited so much wealth he's poorer at age 70 than he was at the time of his inheritance.

Of course Ben's dislike of Obama has nothing to do with race, but he does use the talking points that everyone else who dresses hatred in PC does.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top