Trump tweets because...he can.

[mikey3000]

Yup, thanks to whoever, they didn't rig it enough. All the polls stated a 98% chance of a Shillary win, but they underestimated the intelligence of the people.

 

[rareboy]

As Trump said...he loves the poorly educated.

 

[MakeDigitalLove]

Yup, thanks to whoever, they didn't rig it enough. All the polls stated a 98% chance of a Shillary win, but they underestimated the intelligence of the people.

Electoral College selected him, not the people, though. And no one under estimates the stupidity of Trump supporters, we know how dumb and delusional they are.

 

[mikey3000]

As Trump said...he loves the poorly educated.

Yup, when you have no answer, insult. It's your style. That's ok man, I don't mind. It's all you know.

 

[Kabluey]

Yup, when you have no answer, insult. It's your style. That's ok man, I don't mind. It's all you know.

Trump's supporters have a habit of consistently underscoring the point.

There's no reasoning or rationalising with stupid. They'd prefer to believe that the favorite conspiracy is as valid as any truth.

If you believe 140 characters from a demagogue above all else, then there goes nuance and complexity from any debate.

 

[rareboy]

Yup, when you have no answer, insult. It's your style. That's ok man, I don't mind. It's all you know.

No...I'm just pointing out that once again, we have a Trumper conspiracy theorist who can't be bothered doing any actual research making ridiculous claims without any credible sources.

But you just hang onto those theories as tightly as you can.

btw...I have to assume that you were drunk when you posted about 'Hussein' (which had nothing to do with Saddam) and Obama's bitch.

Pitiful.

 

[Kulindahr]

Well, news alert...you aren't 'listening' to 'Trumpophobes'.



Trump has demonstrated over the last 24 hours that again, he has all the self control of a 13 year old child off his Ritalin.

https://newrepublic.com/article/139546/trumps-tantrums-window-presidency

That's putting it mildly.

And his supporters here are demonstrating the idolization second-graders give to that 13-y.o. because he's so far above them.

 

[Kulindahr]

Then why did Obama do all this two weeks before he leaves office, to teach Russia a lesson? He had eight years to do that.

Please cite evidence of Russian hacking to interfere with our government eight years ago.,

 

[Kulindahr]

duh.

Obama and the US legislature has been hammering Russia with sanctions right and left since they illegally stole the Crimea and have been involved in the civil war in the Ukraine.

You wouldn't know that, because like your new short fingered messiah..you probably didn't know that Russia is on the march to reclaim countries who gained their independence after the fall of the USSR.

This is only the icing on the cake.

And meanwhile GOP congresscritters have been hollering that Obama has been too soft on the Russians.

 

[Kulindahr]

Electoral College selected him, not the people, though. And no one under estimates the stupidity of Trump supporters, we know how dumb and delusional they are.

And after all the talk of finding a way to choose a moderate Republican, when it came time to vote the cowards just did what was expected.

 

[rareboy]

That's putting it mildly.

And his supporters here are demonstrating the idolization second-graders give to that 13-y.o. because he's so far above them.

 

[mikey3000]

Please cite evidence of Russian hacking to interfere with our government eight years ago.,

Russia didn't have to. Eight years ago Killary was spreading birther lies.

 

[Kulindahr]

Russia didn't have to. Eight years ago Killary was spreading birther lies.

So you admit you lied and add another.

 

[mikey3000]

Ha ha! You and GSDX tag teaming now? Yeah, I'm such a liar, that's why she lost. It's all my fault. The FBI found no wrong doing on her part at all. Maybe they are lying too, eh? Is it time to call the Waaahmbulance again?

 

[kallipolis]

Ha ha! You and GSDX tag teaming now? Yeah, I'm such a liar, that's why she lost. It's all my fault. The FBI found no wrong doing on her part at all. Maybe they are lying too, eh? Is it time to call the Waaahmbulance again?

Have you found time to read the FBI statement posted on the other thread by me?

It would appear that you are not comprehending the FBIs recommendation to the DOJ that the bureau recommended that no charges by levelled against HRC.

I am happy to address your misconceptions.

 

[vulgar_newcomer]

I love listening to all the Trumpophobes; I find it rather amusing.

Talk about amusing I was still laughing at the mucked up logic you used and then you double down on it. Wow just incredible but worth noting that is the sort of critical thinking that is being dealt with regarding Trumps crowd. Trump knows how to manipulate his base that is for certain. Worse then feeling bad about his election , I never realized people were just so damn stupid.

That's right. Alternate truth = different perspective. Exactly right.

WRONG

 

[mikey3000]

Have you found time to read the FBI statement posted on the other thread by me?

It would appear that you are not comprehending the FBIs recommendation to the DOJ that the bureau recommended that no charges by levelled against HRC.

I am happy to address your misconceptions.

You mean this one?

Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case. Prosecutors necessarily weigh a number of factors before bringing charges. There are obvious considerations, like the strength of the evidence, especially regarding intent. Responsible decisions also consider the context of a person’s actions, and how similar situations have been handled in the past.

In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.

To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.

As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.

And you of course, don't think Obama had anything to do with not laying charges. Who controls the FBI ? Who issues their mandate? The FBI did their job and let the people decide.

 

[Kulindahr]

Ha ha! You and GSDX tag teaming now? Yeah, I'm such a liar, that's why she lost. It's all my fault. The FBI found no wrong doing on her part at all. Maybe they are lying too, eh? Is it time to call the Waaahmbulance again?

???

You don't have to lie about what she lied about; she's a big enough liar that adding false accusations makes her look good. Hillary didn't start the birther business; it was already around in his political campaigns for U.S. Senator. Nor did she or her campaign ever join in on it.

You continue to deflect from your own lies by referring to other stuff. Your real communication problem here is that in order to smear someone you don't like you resort to falsehood, which allows people who do like her to claim she's some sort of angel when it's shown your claims are false. It's like all the claims that Obama was a socialist in order to smear him; he did enough stupid things and was corrupt enough in his own way that there was no need to make up such garbage.

But all that aside, the real problem here is that you are working very hard to drag the thread off-topic. That's immature.

 

[Kulindahr]

You mean this one?


And you of course, don't think Obama had anything to do with not laying charges. Who controls the FBI ? Who issues their mandate? The FBI did their job and let the people decide.

Thank you for posting a quote that demonstrates you were wrong about the FBI: you claimed they found no wrongdoing, but that isn't the case -- they found wrongdoing but didn't think a case could be made against her in court.

That happens all the time, prosecutors looking at the evidence and seeing wrongdoing but deciding they couldn't convince a jury (of course the opposite happens, too, prosecutors seeing they can make a case when they know the person is innocent).

 

[Kulindahr]

You mean this one?


And you of course, don't think Obama had anything to do with not laying charges. Who controls the FBI ? Who issues their mandate? The FBI did their job and let the people decide.

I can't tell if you're using "and" in the classic and proper sense, i.e. joining two things without a causal connection, or in the sloppier current usage. If the latter....

Since when is it the FBI's job to "let the people decide"? That shows a total ignorance of how the legal system works.

But if the former, then yes -- they did their job, finding evidence of wrongdoing but not enough to go to court over, and then let the people decide the election. But in that case, it's a weird sentence because those two things just don't go together.