- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Posts
- 121,323
- Reaction score
- 32,775
- Points
- 113
I always felt that Graham was a squish and a weasel anyhow. The way I see it, it kind of like being a member of the banking committee and railing against abuse by bankers and then accepting a sweetheart mortgage on house in Ireland. Wait a minute that actually was done, and now Connecticut is stuck with the wannabe war veteran Blumenthal. Ah shit what a dilemma. Everyone is entitled to a private life, even politicians. But when a office holders private life is a contradiction of his public stance, then the voters are entitled to know about it. See, if the guy supported gay rights and was a libertarian, that's consistent and I'd say leave him in the closet. But if he posed as an evangelical, voted against gay rights, but likes to play hide the sausage on the dl, naaaaaaa, open the door and turn on the lights. He's got it coming. At least he doesn't have a wife who will look foolish and used.
This.
Any public figure gives up the right to their own privacy when they are actively working against the same rights for others.


















