freefall
Count Hedgecula
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2009
- Posts
- 7,180
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 36
What I am going to say you can interpret any way you like..I go back and forth myself....
I never had the flu in my life ....so I never took a flu shot until a doctor sorta convinced me it was a good idea...
...and then I got the shot...and I got the flu....and it sucked....
..neither had I ever had pneumonia....but the doctor convinced me with my heart thing it is a good idea to get a shot...
...so I did..and then I got pneumonia.....
...and NOW...I keep hearing about the shingles and the shot I could get...F U C K ......
...I would be a fool not to consider that it might be a bad idea....
Here't the thing. Most doctors would not even consider that I am a physical empath. They would dismiss it..but it is real and it has been scary as hell more than once...like when I had the same physical symptoms as my mom when she was dying...my arm even turned yellow....so maybe..just maybe...since they don't even recognize my condition...that maybe my body is not compatible with the "shots"....
I know that I will not get a definitive answer but occasionally I talk to a lady who completely "gets it" and so I will ask her what she thinks as I trust her to at least give me the best answer and/or tell me if she doesn't know.
I won't talk about physical empathy here (because it might be to some extent true despite the great intersection with hypocondriasis), but there's a very great explanation about why you caught those diseases right after those particular vaccination.
Influenza vaccines are amongst the most precarious vaccines ever made, not because they're not effective, but because the high mutability of the influenza virus. That means in a given plenty of time a single virus gene can mutate into more than 1 variants. Right now there are thousands of influenza virus strains and sadly, a specific vaccine cannot offer protection to all those variants at once. And the vaccine made in one time certainly cannot provide protection to a new mutation occurring after its production - the exact reason why this year vaccine's would be outdated the next year and be replaced with a new vaccine, covering potential new variants, and in turn becomes obsolete the oncoming year. Simply put, if one gets flu vaccine then get the flu itself, then there's high chance flu virus variant isn't covered by the vaccine the one's getting.
As for the pneumonia vaccine, the efficacy rate is actually low from a lot of studies (a colleague of mine in college actually did a scientific review on the studies). In other words, it would not very likely protect you against pneumonia and we need to improve it further. Thus there is a chance you might be at the wrong time and body condition that you immediately catch those diseases after your vaccination - again I'm not dismissing your physical empathy, but there are those chances.
Then why do doctors still recommend taking flu and pneumonia shots? The simple reason would be that the possible protection they offer you greatly outbalance the risks and possible consequences of catching one, moreover since most vaccines nowadays are associated with outrageously rare dire side effects. Thus the ones who would actually benefit from these are people with health problems of which an infection would endanger them, people with weak/suppressed immunity, and frail people (including some aged population). There's however no strict wrong/right here (except for the immunocompromised people) and they're therefore not obligatory. I myself wouldn't routinely advise people to take these two shots regularly, particularly if the person is very healthy and/or still young.
As for shingles, like Neil said: if you had had chicken pox, no need for it. If you already had shingles, no need for it. They're both caused by the same virus and it's very unlikely one had shingles without history of having chicken pox.

