The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Verdict reached in Dharun Ravi webcam spying trial

Clementi was kind of an asshole too in his private conversations, if I remember correctly from the New Yorker article. I know there was at least one derogatory reference made about Ravi being Indian in one of them.
True, but unlike Ravi, Clementi's perceived prejudice didn't lead to him committing a crime against anyone. Of course, until we can crawl into Ravi's head and know for sure what he was thinking when he committed this act, it's pretty much impossible to know for sure why he did what he did, but given all the hateful texts and whatnot, I don't think it's unreasonable to conclude that homophobia probably played a part in it.

Ravi is just an asshole who did a really dumb assholish thing, and yeah, probably is a major fucking douchebag homophobe, but he didn't torture anyone, murder them and drag their body behind his car, as far as I can recall.
No one said he did. He was charged with invasion of privacy -- not murder.

And Clementi, while he certainly he certainly didn't deserve any of this shit to happen to him, shouldn't be made a martyr for jumping off that fucking bridge. Holy shit man, it would have taken less than 24 hours to report that asshole roommate of yours and get him immediately yanked from your room. You could have snapped your fingers, fucked over his college career for what he did to you, and be having the time of your life right now, still in college, getting laid left and right.

A bad thing happened to you. But it would have been SO EASY to take care of it and move on from.
Could he have been more assertive in getting Ravi tossed out on his ass? Perhaps. But he isn't the one on trial. He isn't the one who committed the crime. Just because he didn't handle things the way you or I might've handled things doesn't mean what happened to him should be minimized or that Ravi should be let off the hook. If he only gets a slap on the wrist, who knows what he'll think he can get away with next time.
 
Holy shit man, it would have taken less than 24 hours to report that asshole roommate of yours and get him immediately yanked from your room. You could have snapped your fingers, fucked over his college career for what he did to you
And that way the video would be gone from the internet? Ravi ruined his victim's life, committing suicide was the consequence for the latter.

What would it help to throw out the culprit off college, when anybody can find the victim's involuntary "sex tape" online for centuries?
 
it's just part of why hate crime laws strike a bad cord with me... does it really matter what was in his heart of hearts? he was guilty of invading privacy and evidence/witness tampering, regardless of why he did it.

Hate crime laws are necessary because there are certain groups (LGBT folks, especially transgender people, women, people of color, religious minorities, and etc.) who end up the victims of a disproportionate amount of bias-motivated violence. This is because historically, these groups weren't extended full protection by equally biased law enforcement or judges with lame sentencing habits. So, now, when those offenses happen, prosecutors have another tool in their kit to make the punishments fit the crimes.
 
So, if you don't kill someone, then it's not a real crime?


Cool.


Edit: Oh, and now I see we are back to blaming Tyler


Gotta love the Hipster gays.
 
As I said, anyone who wants to make Dharun Ravi the victim in all of this can just go fuck themselves.
 
Tyler didn't commit the crime. But he did complete it.?

Tyler paid with his life for what he did. It's only fitting that Ravi should pay as well. Not with his life, of course, but at the very least he should spent a few years in prison. You're acting like we should just slap him on the wrist and be done with it. "It's not against the law to be an asshole" and all that.
 
None of our criminal justice system is about prevention or deterrence. The most the wronged parties can hope for is that the defendant doesn't weasel out of a decent sentence due to plea bargaining.
 
We're all so focused on stopping the future Dharun Ravis.

Why not commit the same amount of energy on stopping the future Tyler Clementis?

This is exactly it.

How do we get the message across to this young generation of gay people that they can't be soft?
Have they learned nothing from those who have gone before them?

It shouldn't be the end of the world when others find out you are gay and taking your own life is a wrong (and stupid) response to others finding out you have gay sex.
What if we all did that? Why give hateful and malicious people that kind of power over you?

Being gay is often difficult but it need not be fatal.
 
sixthson "…Being gay is often difficult but it need not be fatal"


^ yes indeed. generations of gays have been doing for centuries. So many US kids nowdays are raised to be either selfishly-over-entitled or pussy sooks
 
Some of you really surprise the shit out of me.

I look forward to Ravi's sentencing.

Yup

It will be a flawless exchange, and these disgruntled gays will foam and seethe but they will deal.

tumblr_lxo8jmBXBA1r5gvg1o1_400.gif
 
Should he receive the maximum penalty of 10 years? Nah, but not because I feel it's too harsh; I just think it's unnecessary and a waste of money.

He's already received the best part of his punishment: for the rest of his life, this is what he'll be known for. So even if he only has to serve a few months, his life is still going to be hell when he gets out.
So, basically what I'm getting from this is that you think any crime less than manslaughter isn't worth prosecuting because it's a waste of time and money to keep non-violent criminals in prison. Do I have that right?

Dharun Ravi recorded his roommate having sex and broadcasted it on the internet for everyone to see -- a crime that very likely led to led to his roommates suicide -- and you think he should just serve a few months and then walk free because its not worth taxpayers money to keep him locked up.

Is that really your greatest concern with this case? What happened to Tyler was awful and all you seem to care about is the budget of the court system and making sure Ravi doesn't get the maximum sentence. Why is that?

I agree with Giancarlo that the interests of justice should be more important than money. Did Ravi commit the worst crime in the world? No, but he did something that was serious enough to warrant at least some time in prison -- and not just a month or two. It's not good enough to say "he's already received the best part of his punishment: for the rest of his life, this is what he'll be known for." Do you think Tyler's family would be satisfied with that? Just setting him free and letting him live life with a bad reputation? That isn't justice. That's a cop-out. And if it was your brother/cousin/son that this happened to, I think you would feel the same way.

As for Tyler being "soft," that's irrelevant. It would've been great if he had thicker skin and was able to just shrug everything off, but even if he did, it still wouldn't change the facts of this case. What Ravi did was illegal and he needs to serve time for it -- 2-5 years at the very least.
 
I am dumbfounded by many of these responses.

At least there are a half-dozen folks around here with a brain......

some of the others? IDK ---

why would anybody (especially here) try to rationalize or other wise find an excuse for this asshole's behavior? why, why why??????

He is personally responsible for Clemente's death IMO - and that's that.
He deserves every second of 10 years in prison - and more -- and as I said before -- without lube!!

The only other thing this thread has accomplished was to give me 2 or 3 more names for my ignore list.

When i read some of these replies - it becomes very very clear why there is such slow advancement of any and all "Gay Agendas" - it's the same reason it took 100 years for women to achieve anykind of equality -- there is way too much infighting amongst a group that should have common goals but they're too busy bickering among themselves to move the rock forward.

What's next? after you're thru trying to find ways to make this hideous crime less "his" fault -- you can look for ways to say that Charles Manson is not such a bad guy after all. Same difference (in my book)
 
The money I'm referring to is the cost of housing a prisoner for 10 years. Which is a lot of money. Is it worth spending in Dharun's case? What's the benefit of locking him up?
The benefit is making sure he pays for his crime and making sure Tyler's family gets justice. Doesn't that count for anything? I don't care how much money it costs to keep him locked up. A lengthy sentence isn't going to make anyone pay more in taxes than they already do, so I say lock his ass up.

To me, setting Ravi free after a couple of months is equivalent to parents who threaten to punish their children and then never follow through with it. Eventually, the children learn they can do whatever they want without any consequences and they grow up thinking the law doesn't apply to them.

Ravi needs to learn that actions have consequences and he needs to pay for what he did -- budget be damned. Tyler's family deserves justice. Wouldn't you want the same thing if he was your son or brother?

Is he a physical danger to the outside world if released? Would prolonged time in jail 'rehabilitate him' in any way? Is the likely-overcrowded prison he'd be sent to filled with offenders who are a much greater danger to society than he is?
LoL, at this point I think you're just being disagreeable for the sake of being disagreeable, so I'm not going to debate this any further. I respect your opinion, but it's clear you and I aren't going to see eye to eye on this.
 
The benefit of locking him up is setting up legal precedent and seeing that justice is done.
I agree.

What kind of message it would send if the judge let him off with only a couple months served? Ravi would be over the moon, thinking "Ha! One less fag in the world and I'm still a free man." It would be like vindication for him.

The thought alone is infuriating.
 
I can't get Clementi's face or fate out of my mind. It is so agonizing to me to think that he spent his last minutes of his life being so tormented by his humiliation that he saw the only answer was to take a train in order to commit suicide. To think the only thing he could think about was how awful his life would be if he kept living.

Ravi has to live with this -- at least I hope he has enough human spirit left to continually regret that his actions drove another person to kill himself.

What a sad and tragic event all the way around. I very much like the comment in one article I read that made it seem like this case was making a point that being reckless and young is not a defense against ruining someone's life.
 
I have a correction regarding Dharun's potential sentence. The maximum for the highest count he was convicted of is 10 years. He was convicted of 15 counts. He is facing a potential of 60.5 or 65 years (depending on who is doing the calculation) if the judge chooses to give him consecutive instead of concurrent sentences. I don't believe anybody thinks we will get 60 years, but there is definitely potential for it to be more than 10 years. I wouldn't be surprised to see concurrent for all the invasion and bias charges, but then add on the evidence and witness related charges as those occurred after the original crimes and courts typically take those charges very seriously. It seems to me there has to be separate sentences for the cover up related charges or there won't be a deterrent for future defendants to avoid destroying evidence and tampering with witnesses.

I wonder how stupid Dharun's parents feel for refusing to consider a plea deal. From what I have read and heard, they basically shot down consideration of any plea deal that included a guilty plea on any of the bias charges. Now they will be going to see their son in prison for years knowing they could have taken a deal with no jail time. I personally don't think a plea of no jail time was appropriate in the case and I'm glad the Dharun didn't take it. I wonder if they thought a jury wouldn't find him guilty of bias charges because the victim was gay. In any case, they rolled the dice and lost big.

I do think there is a good chance that the bias charges will be overturned on appeal. The problem is the law is poorly worded and there was a lot of debate about what the intent of the law was and how the jury should be instructed. I won't be surprised to see the law struck down and therefore those convictions being overturned. I believe the other convictions would stand and Dharun will still spend a few years in jail and be deported afterward.
 
I wonder how stupid Dharun's parents feel for refusing to consider a plea deal. From what I have read and heard, they basically shot down consideration of any plea deal that included a guilty plea on any of the bias charges.

Yeah, it was stupid of him not to take the plea deal. If he had simply admitted his guilt, he would've avoided prison time and only had to serve a couple hundred hours of community service. Apparently that was beneath him though.
 
A questionable apology... better late than never.

Dharun Ravi: "I'm very sorry about Tyler"

Dharun Ravi's face is drawn and thin. The stress of the last year and a half has wrung him out. His eyes are perpetually sad, not the eyes of a very bright 20-year-old young man who should have a promising future.

He is sitting on a plush maroon sofa in his parents living room, free on bail but still a prisoner in public opinion. He has been convicted of a hate crime for spying on Tyler Clementi, who jumped to his death from the George Washington Bridge after the episode. Ravi was not charged in Clementi’s death, but without the suicide, the case would have never drawn so much public attention.

Now, for the first time, Dharun Ravi explains his side of the story in a two-hour exclusive interview with The Star-Ledger.

"I’m not the same person I was two years ago," he said. "I don’t even recognize the person I was two years ago."

That person, Ravi admits, was immature. And did some stupid things. And was insensitive to Tyler Clementi’s feelings.

"But I wasn’t biased," Ravi said. "I didn’t act out of hate and I wasn’t uncomfortable with Tyler being gay."

And this person is committed to continuing to try and prove he did not commit a bias crime.

"The verdict actually made me feel energized," he said. "We (his family, friends and attorneys) will keep going."

In September of 2010, after Clementi committed suicide, it was quickly learned that Ravi spied on Clementi while he had a male guest in their Rutgers’ freshman dorm room. The story exploded on the national conscience as a case of homophobic cyberbullying, and Ravi was cast as the arch-villain.

Last Friday, after a month-long trial in which Ravi did not testify in his own defense, he was convicted of all 15 counts of privacy invasion, investigation tampering and bias intimidation. He faces a 10-year jail term, with sentencing set for May 21. Prior to the trial, he turned down a plea deal that would have kept him out of jail. But he had to admit to charges of bias intimidation.

"I’m never going to regret not taking the plea," Ravi said emphatically. "If I took the plea, I would have had to testify that I did what I did to intimidate Tyler and that would be a lie. I won’t ever get up there and tell the world I hated Tyler because he was gay, or tell the world I was trying to hurt or intimidate him because it’s not true."

"My high school (West Windsor-Plainsboro High School North) has all kinds of kids," said Ravi, dressed in blue jeans and a black pullover. "There were a lot of Indians, Chinese, Korean kids, some Hispanic, white kids. It’s hard to form hate when you grow up around so many different kinds of kids."

Ravi says he didn’t have much experience with gays in Plainsboro, but met a few at Rutgers.

"One of my friends had a gay roommate and I met a gay kid I liked a lot at orientation. They were cool. It was no big deal. Now there’s a verdict out there that says I hate gays. The jury has decided they know what is going on in my mind; they can tell you what you think."

Ravi said he decided not to room with one of his friends from high school because he wanted to meet new people, and his only problem with Clementi was his reserved personality.

"Before I went to school I thought my roommate would be my best friend and we would hang out all the time," he said. "I thought I could expand my circle of friends. But he (Tyler) wasn’t like that. He was very quiet and every conversation we had just hit a dead end."

During the course of the trial, Ravi’s attorney, Steve Altman, maintained Ravi was "just a kid, doing the stupid stuff kids do," but that he was also put off by the appearance of Clementi’s guest, a 30-year-old man known only as M.B. that the Rutgers freshman met on a gay dating Internet site.

In today's interview, with Altman by his side, Ravi agreed Clementi’s sexuality was never the issue.

"If it was a girl who came to the room and she looked as strange as M.B., I would have done the same thing," he said.

The issue, he says, was M.B.

When Rutgers police first came to his room because Tyler was missing, Ravi said he feared "it had something to do with M.B."

"I thought it was something sinister, that maybe he got mixed up with the wrong guy," Ravi said. "I told one of my friends, ‘I wish I recorded (the first incident, on Sept. 19) so I would have an image of the guy (M.B.) to give to the police."

On the night of the first incident, Ravi’s co-defendant, Molly Wei, testified they only watched the webcam images for scant seconds, then shut it down when they saw the men were kissing. Ravi’s defense has always been that he was worried about his iPad and other stuff in his room when he saw M.B., who looked "shady" to him.

Wei later opened up the camera for a second view, which was seen by about five people. Ravi today said he was not in the room for that second view, in which the men were still kissing but shirtless.

On the second night, Sept. 21, Ravi said he was at dinner when Tyler texted him asking for the room again.

"I thought it was weird he was asking for the room again on a weekday," Ravi said today. "I didn’t mind because I knew I had (ultimate) Frisbee practice, but I remember thinking, if this is going to be every other day, it’s going to be a problem. But I didn’t want to confront him because it was already difficult to talk to him."

Ravi says the tweet he sent to friends suggesting they tune into his webcam to see Clementi with M.B. was a joke, but one in which he severely underestimated the effect on Tyler.

"I knew my friends would think it was a joke because they know my sense of humor," he said. "But eventually I thought it was stupid, so I went back into the room and pointed the camera back at my bed."

Asked this question, "What were you thinking?" Ravi candidly stated, "I wasn’t."

"At that point, I got caught up in what I thought was funny, and my own ego."

Known as a computer whiz among his friends, Ravi admitted he was trying to show off.

"I never really thought about what it would mean to Tyler," he said. "I know that’s wrong, but that’s the truth."

Ravi said he felt almost immediate remorse. "I knew it was stupid so I went in and pointed the camera away from the bed."

(The images were never shown because the computer went dead. Clementi would text friends that he pulled the plug; the defense maintained Ravi put it on "sleep" before the plug was pulled.)

Ravi said his second wave of remorse came when he realized Tyler found out about his prank.

"I didn’t want to upset him," Ravi said. "I never thought he would find out. I figured I would tell him later and we would laugh about it."

When Tyler did find out, he asked for a room change, and Ravi said he wanted to talk him out of moving.

"One of the most frustrating parts is that he never got my apology," Ravi said. "I texted an apology and when he didn’t answer, I e-mailed him. I told him I didn’t want him to feel pressure to have to move and that we could work things out."

The text was shown in court.

Of course, Ravi said, the greatest remorse came when he found out Tyler was dead.

"I'm very sorry about Tyler," he said. "I have parents and a little brother, and I can only try to imagine how they feel. But I want the Clementis to know I had no problem with their son. I didn’t hate Tyler and I knew he was okay with me. I wanted to talk to his parents, but I was afraid. I didn’t know what to say."

"At first, I actually thought I could be helpful because as far as I knew, I was the last one to see him alive."

On that night, Clementi came back to their room, dropped off his backpack, then left.

"The last time I saw him he seemed completely normal," Ravi said. "We didn’t say much, and then he was gone."

Source: The Star Ledger
 
"One of the most frustrating parts is that he never got my apology," Ravi said. "I texted an apology and when he didn’t answer, I e-mailed him. I told him I didn’t want him to feel pressure to have to move and that we could work things out."
I call bullshit on this.

In the "apology" he sent to Tyler, he claimed what happened was an "accident" and that his actions were "good-natured," and then he went on to text Molly Wei to ask whether or not she let the cat out of the bag that they did it on purpose.

His apology to Tyler wasn't sincere.
 
Back
Top