The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Watch: Secret Mormon Ceremonies Revealed -- How Mormons Baptize Dead Non-Mormons

Just_Believe18 said:
Alright, you need to stop. You have no evidence to prove Obama is a believer to this "Black Liberation Theology." You've been proven wrong time and time again on this matter. Further references of this are suspect to racist motivations. Your obsession over it is ridiculous and offensive.
Click to expand...

He was a member of a church whose teachings were based on BLT.

Proved wrong?

Your deck of race cards is empty.

Do not start calling me a racist.
 
Jack Springer said:
He was a member of a church whose teachings were based on BLT.

Proved wrong?

Your deck of race cards is empty.

Do not start calling me a racist.
Click to expand...

He does not believe in that. Furthermore, you won't even define or explain the context of why you are using that term on this forum. You just tell us to "look it up." The reason why you won't delve into your accusations is because you can't explain it without sounding like a racist. So you use the term over and over again, because your vague slur is just good enough to get past the moderators.

Well I'm calling you on your bullshit. Stop it.
 
Jack Springer said:
He was a member of a church whose teachings were based on BLT.

Proved wrong?

Your deck of race cards is empty.

Do not start calling me a racist.
Click to expand...

I've attended concerts -- does that make me a musician?

You've never established more than circumstantial evidence for your claim about Obama. That you persist in it... makes JB's observation not out of line.
 
Just_Believe18 said:
He does not believe in that. Furthermore, you won't even define or explain the context of why you are using that term on this forum. You just tell us to "look it up." The reason why you won't delve into your accusations is because you can't explain it without sounding like a racist. So you use the term over and over again, because your vague slur is just good enough to get past the moderators.

Well I'm calling you on your bullshit. Stop it.
Click to expand...

I looked it up, to refresh my memory. Jack is looking at the most extreme aspects, for starters. Then he makes two unfounded assumptions: that Wright adhered to the most extreme, and that Obama accepted them all uncritically.

And this on top of his Marxist and Muslim heritages, I presume.
 
How long before the moderators compute that you can't ONLY censor posters attacking other posters and never addressing the CAUSE, which is that other posters spout racism, xenophobia, occasionally even homophobia on here?
 
Just_Believe18 said:
He does not believe in that. Furthermore, you won't even define or explain the context of why you are using that term on this forum. You just tell us to "look it up." The reason why you won't delve into your accusations is because you can't explain it without sounding like a racist. So you use the term over and over again, because your vague slur is just good enough to get past the moderators.

Well I'm calling you on your bullshit. Stop it.
Click to expand...

It is that dogwhistle thing again.
 
Rolyo85 said:
How long before the moderators compute that you can't ONLY censor posters attacking other posters and never addressing the CAUSE, which is that other posters spout racism, xenophobia, occasionally even homophobia on here?
Click to expand...

I think "spout" is too strong. "Evidence", perhaps; "give the appearance of", most certainly. The thing is, so long as one doesn't flat come and with racist material, one may imply all sorts of things.
 
swerve said:
I disagree with you...

When it comes to Mormonism -- it should ABSOLUTELY be an AUTOMATIC disqualifier in ALL voters minds...

The FOUNDER of the Mormon church TRIED to become president -- but was killed prior to the election...

They've wanted to gain control of OUR government EVER SINCE...

They hold DISDAIN for the laws of OUR country...

PLEASE read the book "Under the Banner of Heaven: A story of violent faith"...
Click to expand...

Thaks, Its hard to come up with a response since every one comes up with their own beliefs.
Like chance1 tries to hide his hatred of "anything that is hated".
 
Rolyo85 said:
How long before the moderators compute that you can't ONLY censor posters attacking other posters and never addressing the CAUSE, which is that other posters spout racism, xenophobia, occasionally even homophobia on here?
Click to expand...

The better approach is to not dignify racism, xenophobia or homophobia with a response, and just report the offensive post. That way the moderators do not have to try to figure out which one is the ass.
 
Rolyo85 said:
I have done that. I'm told it's within the rules. Apparently not being directed at another user is all it takes for it to be in the rules.
Click to expand...

No, it's not that simple.

Code of Conduct:
8. Please do not use language that sounds like, stands for, hints at, abbreviates, or insinuates hate speech (including but not limited to racial, ethnic, sexual, or religious slurs) or illegal activities.
Click to expand...
 
Rolyo85 said:
How long before the moderators compute that you can't ONLY censor posters attacking other posters and never addressing the CAUSE, which is that other posters spout racism, xenophobia, occasionally even homophobia on here?
Click to expand...

This entire thread is a religious slur, is it not?
 
That depends on whether or not mormons baptize dead people.

It seems they do.

The facts are what they are, no matter how ugly or uncomfortable they make someone.
 
Benvolio said:
This entire thread is a religious slur, is it not?
Click to expand...

I think the entire thread reveals a religious slur. Does it not seem odious to you that someone might have lived his life to the end having reached contentment with his conception of any afterlife, only to find meddling mormons haunting him in the afterlife for a switch, to tell him he picked the wrong religion...

It is one thing if the Mormons come to my door whilst I'm alive; it is an entirely different matter if they come knocking once I'm in the grave.
 
bankside said:
I think the entire thread reveals a religious slur. Does it not seem odious to you that someone might have lived his life to the end having reached contentment with his conception of any afterlife, only to find meddling mormons haunting him in the afterlife for a switch, to tell him he picked the wrong religion...

It is one thing if the Mormons come to my door whilst I'm alive; it is an entirely different matter if they come knocking once I'm in the grave.
Click to expand...

Which seems a little silly don't you think, if they can actually find you in the afterlife then they are probably right and you really going to object to someone helping out? If they aren't right it will mean absolutely nothing to you as you are either in the afterlife you expected or your just dead.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top