Peloso
no, really, I'm fine
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2018
- Posts
- 7,059
- Reaction score
- 3,521
- Points
- 113
What is an LGBT film anyway? 
Is it meant to fill the gap left by by Hollywood's reluctance to portray gay romance? AIDS was done to death in the 90's. I'd say there are plenty of other subjects for LGBT films to tackle besides romance, especially now, yet almost every film on this thread seems to be about romance. These days, you would think the trans community, for example, would come up with some films that could carry a great deal of gravitas.
Many years ago I remember seeing an ad for a film called "Smoke Signals" that touted itself as the first film to be made by Native Americans. Cringey title aside, I have no interest in seeing a film just because it was made by a particular group. That would be like rushing out to see a film that was only shot on Tuesdays.
Since romance bores me, I generally avoid LGBT films. Two films I love dearly are "My Own Private Idaho", which is more of an art film than a LGBT film, and Gregg Araki's "The Doom Generation" which does fall squarely into the "New Queer Cinema" movement of the 90's, but deals with, among other things, internalized homophobia and the sometimes very thin line between heterosexuality and bi-curiosity. As a jokey and bratty caveat, Araki even subtitled it "A Heterosexual film by Gregg Araki"
Black cinema has had more success crossing over into the mainstream than LGBT cinema has, because they tackle other subjects besides "See? We can love too." It seems to me a lot of LGBT films are self-ghettoizing.
	
		
			
		
		
	
				
			Is it meant to fill the gap left by by Hollywood's reluctance to portray gay romance? AIDS was done to death in the 90's. I'd say there are plenty of other subjects for LGBT films to tackle besides romance, especially now, yet almost every film on this thread seems to be about romance. These days, you would think the trans community, for example, would come up with some films that could carry a great deal of gravitas.
Many years ago I remember seeing an ad for a film called "Smoke Signals" that touted itself as the first film to be made by Native Americans. Cringey title aside, I have no interest in seeing a film just because it was made by a particular group. That would be like rushing out to see a film that was only shot on Tuesdays.
Since romance bores me, I generally avoid LGBT films. Two films I love dearly are "My Own Private Idaho", which is more of an art film than a LGBT film, and Gregg Araki's "The Doom Generation" which does fall squarely into the "New Queer Cinema" movement of the 90's, but deals with, among other things, internalized homophobia and the sometimes very thin line between heterosexuality and bi-curiosity. As a jokey and bratty caveat, Araki even subtitled it "A Heterosexual film by Gregg Araki"
Black cinema has had more success crossing over into the mainstream than LGBT cinema has, because they tackle other subjects besides "See? We can love too." It seems to me a lot of LGBT films are self-ghettoizing.


 
						 
 
		 
 
		
 Fat chance.
 Fat chance. 
 
		

 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 ? The previews didn't put you off? And the title?
? The previews didn't put you off? And the title?
 
 
		 
 
		
