On Topic Discussion What do you think about bisexuals?

[otters]

Your fix implies I can stand cats, and is therefore ignorant ^_^

Thank you for the cue
I understand that Bisexuals like Cats AND Dogs. Simple, isn't it?

 

[Stardreamer]

Total Chaos!!!!

 

[otters]

And I dont think anyone is even considering anything the trolls say.

considering what they say? — quite certainly no.
but feeling disgusted by the drivel they're spouting, or offended, or at least annoyed? — unfortunately, yes.

and: I forgot to mention «repeat sock»

 

[mikemizanin729]

All this presumption of bisexual privilege just comes off as bitterness and indictment by accusation.

This forum has members that change horses frequently, just as long at the new steed knows how to trample other lesser beings here, that is all that is required.

Sickening.

You know what. I actually agree with this post.

 

[MakeDigitalLove]

considering what they say? — quite certainly no.
but feeling disgusted by the drivel they're spouting, or offended, or at least annoyed? — unfortunately, yes.

Then I am curious who actually considered anyone in this thread lesser. Since anyone who is actually discussing anything in the thread didnt say that or make that apparent.

 

[otters]

Then I am curious who actually considered anyone in this thread lesser. Since anyone who is actually discussing anything in the thread didnt say that or make that apparent.

it's rather subtext, but let me ask, the other way around:
those who are inclined to question the bisexuals' integrity (I mean the moral one, or how one wants to phrase it), may they have forgotten
a) that quite probably bisexuality is genetically determined — just like homosexuality?
and
b) that there is a really high probabilty that gay people have bisexuals in their ancestry?
— in so far… one has the really uncomfortable impression that some think: gay is «pure», but bisexual is «impure»?

 

[Rolyo85]

Nothing you say has anything to do with any questions, discussions or fights raised anywhere in this topic by people who actually engaged others in conversation and didn't just come to troll. I don't know what you've read, but if it's been HERE, I would love some quotes.

 

[otters]

Nothing you say has anything to do with any questions, discussions or fights raised anywhere in this topic by people who actually engaged others in conversation and didn't just come to troll. I don't know what you've read, but if it's been HERE, I would love some quotes.

please use search function: «cheat», e.g.

 

[Rolyo85]

Yeah, no, I am not gonna do that. You make bold sweeping claims. Now support them with proof. It's easy to heap accusations and then repeat them next time as if they are fact. It's your job to show people they ARE actually fact.

 

[otters]

Yeah, no, I am not gonna do that. You make bold sweeping claims. Now support them with proof. It's easy to heap accusations and then repeat them next time as if they are fact. It's your job to show people they ARE actually fact.

Let’s say: I guess you might have figured out that I usually am able to distinguish whether an orchestra plays Bach, or Mozart, or Shostakovich.
Here in this thread, a couple of orchestras play at the same time, but quite different pieces, and apparently without any conductor, I guess?
And now, when my account of an impression (which I gave as such a thing, I think) has been misunderstood and is now interpreted as an accusation, then I'm really awfully sorry.

 

[MakeDigitalLove]

it's rather subtext, but let me ask, the other way around:
those who are inclined to question the bisexuals' integrity (I mean the moral one, or how one wants to phrase it), may they have forgotten
a) that quite probably bisexuality is genetically determined — just like homosexuality?
and
b) that there is a really high probabilty that gay people have bisexuals in their ancestry?
— in so far… one has the really uncomfortable impression that some think: gay is «pure», but bisexual is «impure»?

What does this have to do with what I said?

 

[otters]

What does this have to do with what I said?

oh, my bad ……… not much I guess

I was, finally, trying to give a glimpse what I consider could be an additional answer to the thread's head line.

 

[LuckysRevenge]

Can someone catch me up on what the thread is about now?

 

[xbuzzerx]

it's rather subtext, but let me ask, the other way around:
those who are inclined to question the bisexuals' integrity (I mean the moral one, or how one wants to phrase it), may they have forgotten
a) that quite probably bisexuality is genetically determined — just like homosexuality?
and
b) that there is a really high probabilty that gay people have bisexuals in their ancestry?
— in so far… one has the really uncomfortable impression that some think: gay is «pure», but bisexual is «impure»?

So far as I recall little or nothing in this thread has centered on morality. Perhaps a few small side tangents. And the few bisexual posters who spoke up on the subject of causality didn't speak of genetic determination, they spoke about sexual fluidity and openness of sexuality that, in general, most straight/gay men don't really believe in.

 

[otters]

So far as I recall little or nothing in this thread has centered on morality. Perhaps a few small side tangents. And the few bisexual posters who spoke up on the subject of causality didn't speak of genetic determination, they spoke about sexual fluidity and openness of sexuality that, in general, most straight/gay men don't really believe in.

by chance this weekend I was talking with friends who are geneticists, precisely siblings and a spouse, one of the siblings a cisgender gay male guy, and we were discussing the aforementioned option — that's the reason why I now posted this new nuance.

 

[Rolyo85]

Let’s say: I guess you might have figured out that I usually am able to distinguish whether an orchestra plays Bach, or Mozart, or Shostakovich.
Here in this thread, a couple of orchestras play at the same time, but quite different pieces, and apparently without any conductor, I guess?
And now, when my account of an impression (which I gave as such a thing, I think) has been misunderstood and is now interpreted as an accusation, then I'm really awfully sorry.

Yeah, my problem comes from the fact that said impression is then presented as some undeniable "status quo" of how things "are" on JUB, and used to paint bisexuals here as some oppressed minority whose very existences is constantly questioned by closeminded gays. When nobody but random trolls actually has done anything of the kind. I don't like being treated with hostility in a conversation for something I haven't done.

 

[otters]

Yeah, my problem comes from the fact that said impression is then presented as some undeniable "status quo" of how things "are" on JUB, and used to paint bisexuals here as some oppressed minority whose very existences is constantly questioned by closeminded gays. When nobody but random trolls actually has done anything of the kind. I don't like being treated with hostility in a conversation for something I haven't done.

Probably I was curt, and quite sure my syntax was botched, but I didn't want to annoy you. Sorry again.

 

[Rolyo85]

No worries. It's just how preconceptions are formed

 

[blackbeltninja]

Yeah, my problem comes from the fact that said impression is then presented as some undeniable "status quo" of how things "are" on JUB, and used to paint bisexuals here as some oppressed minority whose very existences is constantly questioned by closeminded gays. When nobody but random trolls actually has done anything of the kind. I don't like being treated with hostility in a conversation for something I haven't done.

This objection is from you, the self-appointed King of Gay?

Brilliant.

-d-

 

[CupidBoy]

I've hooked up with bi guys in the past and it was a turn on thinking about them being into girls too, I don't care about the label, it's the person that counts.

Plus dereperez is bi and he's pretty fucking sexy.