The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

What is new on the Gay Marriage front?

I've been saying this all along. The original 5-4 decision was too close for comfort. Better if it was 7-2 or something.

**FULLY** expect prohibition of gay marriage (or any other rights of any kind for gay people) to be the law of the land, once the Supreme Court is solidly nested in the Republican shopping cart.

Will any foreign countries accept Americans who may fear for their lives under anti-gay pogroms here?

Republican hatred for "teh gay" is total, absolute, and unstoppable...we are worse than child molesters in their eyes,
 
frankfrank said:
I've been saying this all along. The original 5-4 decision was too close for comfort. Better if it was 7-2 or something.

**FULLY** expect prohibition of gay marriage (or any other rights of any kind for gay people) to be the law of the land, once the Supreme Court is solidly nested in the Republican shopping cart.

Will any foreign countries accept Americans who may fear for their lives under anti-gay pogroms here?

Republican hatred for "teh gay" is total, absolute, and unstoppable...we are worse than child molesters in their eyes,
Click to expand...

It's pretty critical than a Democrat win the next election, so that Ginsberg can retire.
 
^ Or, most likely, BOTH. If there's a Democratic President and Senate, I think it's entirely 100% safe to ASSUME that Ginsberg will retire...despite the big danger if you ASS/U/ME (which of course only works in English).

It's also pretty critical that Democrats decisively take over the Senate with well more than fifty-one votes, getting past the dangers of a tie vote where the President of the Senate decides. (I believe the President of the Senate is sometimes NOT a sitting Senator.) This will hopefully allow to also override one or two DINO's who may have "D" after their names, but generally vote with Republicans.

You know, like Nebraska's BEN NELSON when he was in the Senate...
 
frankfrank said:
**FULLY** expect prohibition of gay marriage (or any other rights of any kind for gay people) to be the law of the land, once the Supreme Court is solidly nested in the Republican shopping cart.

Will any foreign countries accept Americans who may fear for their lives under anti-gay pogroms here?

Republican hatred for "teh gay" is total, absolute, and unstoppable...we are worse than child molesters in their eyes,
Click to expand...

I hope I die before the "Christian Right" starts marching us off to concentration camps... unfortunately, I'm not that old.
 
frankfrank said:
I've been saying this all along. The original 5-4 decision was too close for comfort. Better if it was 7-2 or something.

**FULLY** expect prohibition of gay marriage (or any other rights of any kind for gay people) to be the law of the land, once the Supreme Court is solidly nested in the Republican shopping cart.

Will any foreign countries accept Americans who may fear for their lives under anti-gay pogroms here?

Republican hatred for "teh gay" is total, absolute, and unstoppable...we are worse than child molesters in their eyes,
Click to expand...

Both the marriage equality decision and the Heller decision should have been 9 - 0. No one who understands liberty and the intent of the Framers could decide otherwise. But today's ideologues on both sides are opposed to the actual intent, preferring to strive to remake society into what they think the Framers should have meant.


It's past time to organize the Rainbow Rifles, and let the crypto-fascists join those threatened by the idea of a "Second Amendment solution".
 
hotatlboi said:
It's pretty critical than a Democrat win the next election, so that Ginsberg can retire.
Click to expand...

I don't see any Democrats with a chance of being elected who wouldn't just pick ideologues. The best candidate for SCOTUS we had was killed in the attack on Gabby Giffords... but no one claiming to be a liberal would have nominated him, for ideological reasons.
 
^ Corporate America understands the importance of diversity to productivity and success in commerce.

Republicans have lost their war against gays, but they have yet to understand that fact. Here is a Marco Rubio campaign ad, in which he says he is running for "millions with traditional values branded as bigots and haters:"


Rubio is appealing to Republican bigotry and hatred, of course, because that is who the Republican Party is. But young people do not share these Republican values of xenophobia, racism, homophobia, and hate. Every year, more of this traditional, elderly base of Republicans dies off, and is replaced by a more tolerant, enlightened electorate.
 
^ Which that Republican base no doubt find horrifying and vote candidates who promise to evangelise the young.
Promoting and enforcing 'family values'.
 
Republican family values: If the parents fall on hard times (or maybe the dad gets killed; or the baby was from rape), absolutely make sure that THE BABY IS BORN **NO NATTER WHAT** GODDAMIT - then, wielding the weapons of Republican economic and social policies, bludgeon and kick against any kind of thing at all that will possibly help the child...and, if the child dies, it's perfectly fine.

Love the fetus, hate the baby.
 
jbown329 said:
Ginsberg? No, more like Scrotumlia.
Click to expand...

This is the problem.

Scalia won't retire. He is determined to die in his seat.

And it is why it is so important that Hillary is elected because the next President will effectively define the Supreme Court and the cuase of liberalism for the next decade or even more.
 
^ Not to mention that at Scalia's age, he may well retire during the next Presidential term, by force-of-health. At his age, anything can happen quite suddenly.

Under President Trump, even a Scalia equal wouldn't pass the necessary litmus tests. Mike Huckabee or Sally Kern (Oklahoma/look her up) would be valid Repuke nominations...or Scott Lively, etc. (You may have to look him up, too, but suffice to say he has been the single most influential human IN THE WORLD in getting the death-to-gays stuff going on in Africa.)

I dread to think who they would pick to succeed Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and even Hillary I'm sure wouldn't pick anybody THAT good, but a "R" would surely pick yet another nominee like the people in the first paragraph.

The Supreme Court issue NEVER gets much traction in election years. It's too complex an issue for most Americans.
 
frankfrank said:
^ Not to mention that at Scalia's age, he may well retire during the next Presidential term, by force-of-health. At his age, anything can happen quite suddenly.

Under President Trump, even a Scalia equal wouldn't pass the necessary litmus tests. Mike Huckabee or Sally Kern (Oklahoma/look her up) would be valid Repuke nominations...or Scott Lively, etc. (You may have to look him up, too, but suffice to say he has been the single most influential human IN THE WORLD in getting the death-to-gays stuff going on in Africa.)

I dread to think who they would pick to succeed Ruth Bader Ginsberg, and even Hillary I'm sure wouldn't pick anybody THAT good, but a "R" would surely pick yet another nominee like the people in the first paragraph.

The Supreme Court issue NEVER gets much traction in election years. It's too complex an issue for most Americans.
Click to expand...

I suspect that one reason it doesn't get much attention is that the American people have come to realize that no matter who does the nominating we aren't going to get any champions of liberty on the Court.
 
frankfrank said:
Not to mention that at Scalia's age, he may well retire during the next Presidential term, by force-of-health. At his age, anything can happen quite suddenly.
Click to expand...

Scalia will only be 88 when a Republican replaces Hillary in 2024. He will not retire before then.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top