NotHardUp1
What? Me? Really?
You remind me so, so much of another jubber who has the habit of deleting only to come back again, just to stir that pot a little.
The victim may have been 26, but anyone could see he was so terrified of getting conflicting orders shouted at him he was in tears.
In my opinion this was a brutal murder, carried out by an excited cop. It was plain that the man presented no threat at all.
Just throwing this in here, why did the cop not Tazer him instead?
Tragically, the paramilitary mentality of some of these teams seems to preclude all mid-range measures.
The options seem to be all at the extreme ends of the scale. The arrest can either be completely peaceful with no means of mitigation or containment used, or deadly force.
There are myriad methods of intervention containment possible, from sonic methods, to stun guns, to sticky goo, to nets, to bullet-proof shields, and so forth. Yet, despite the cop witnessing no threatening actions or behaviors or attitudes, he declared the situation to be constantly escalating. Every single physical motion was interpreted as a legally defensible basis for using deadly force, not merely containing or appropriate force. And sadly, his fallacy is indeed the law's fallacy, and therefore, his slaughter of the innocent became sanctioned by the State, a deadly error and one that will ultimately result in change. The Citizenry will not forever accept the abuses of the State. This is not Russia.

