Who will be the first person to be killed at a Donald Trump rally?

[Benvolio]

Democrats want a one party system, like Chicago, Mexico, Russia. Remember how Romney was demonized and hated? For what? Mrs Romney was told she was like Stalin. Remember how McCain was demonized, Palin, Dole? Not for their policies, but because they are not democrats. Blaming the riots on Trump is clearly false.

 

[Kabluey]

Democrats want a one party system, like Chicago, Mexico, Russia. Remember how Romney was demonized and hated? For what? Mrs Romney was told she was like Stalin. Remember how McCain was demonized, Palin, Dole? Not for their policies, but because they are not democrats. Blaming the riots on Trump is clearly false.

And you demonise people who talk about charity, acceptance and justice.
Who hates more? You or the people who tell you you're racist?

 

[rareboy]

^ Pretty much this.

From someone who demonizes all immigrants and non-whites....Benvolio's hypocrisy is staggering. But typical. Total cognitive dissonance.

 

[Benvolio]

And you demonise people who talk about charity, acceptance and justice.
Who hates more? You or the people who tell you you're racist?

No, we do not. We discuss the economic and societal damage and you choose to demonize those discussions as racism. You use race in much the same way as the Nazis: to gain power. He taught hatred of the Jews etc, you teach hatred of rich whites and other whites by accusing them of racism. You use accusations of race to deflect discussion of the effects on unemployment, wages, crime, environment, education, health care, welfare.

 

[Rolyo85]

No, we do not. We discuss the economic and societal damage and you choose to demonize those discussions as racism. You use race in much the same way as the Nazis: to gain power. He taught hatred of the Jews etc, you teach hatred of rich whites and other whites by accusing them of racism. You use accusations of race to deflect discussion of the effects on unemployment, wages, crime, environment, education, health care, welfare.

I'm sorry, so to clarify, you're fine with German, blonde, white, well educated immigrants?

 

[peeonme]

So, if we don't want a person to run for public office we then have a right to infiltrate a place that this person has rented for the event and disrupt it?

Protesters have every right to protest on public property, people of all political persuasions have a right to hold a rally in a place of their choosing that they have paid for.

The next time a black man runs for president do we want a bunch of white supremacist idiots flooding a rally?

 

[Kabluey]

No, we do not. We discuss the economic and societal damage and you choose to demonize those discussions as racism. You use race in much the same way as the Nazis: to gain power. He taught hatred of the Jews etc, you teach hatred of rich whites and other whites by accusing them of racism. You use accusations of race to deflect discussion of the effects on unemployment, wages, crime, environment, education, health care, welfare.

The Nazis scapegoated Jewish and Roma minorities as the reason for Germany's economic woes.
Just as Trump scapegoats Mexican and Muslim minorities.
You have a poor grip on history, and reality, it seems. Shamefully equating liberty with Nazism? Bizarre.

 

[Benvolio]

The Nazis scapegoated Jewish and Roma minorities as the reason for Germany's economic woes.
Just as Trump scapegoats Mexican and Muslim minorities.
You have a poor grip on history, and reality, it seems. Shamefully equating liberty with Nazism? Bizarre.

Again, you cannot discuss the economic effects of massive immigration on unemployment, wages, crime, environment, education, health care and welfare, but must deflect it to race and your own anti-white racism.

 

[Kabluey]

Again, you cannot discuss the economic effects of massive immigration on unemployment, wages, crime, environment, education, health care and welfare, but must deflect it to race and your own anti-white racism.

You shamefully scapegoat all problems on immigrants, even when the data disagrees with you.
Saying it's wrong to be a racist dog whistler isn't racist.

 

[Benvolio]

You shamefully scapegoat all problems on immigrants, even when the data disagrees with you.
Saying it's wrong to be a racist dog whistler isn't racist.

It is not scapegoating. If you have millions of unemployed or at low wages, and you bring in millions and millions more unemployed, willing to work even cheaper, you have millions more poor and unemployed. It makes no difference what race the immigrants are, the result is the same. Blacks have by far the highest number of unemployed with hispanics the second highest. Immigration does the most harm to the minorities.

 

[Kabluey]

It is not scapegoating. If you have millions of unemployed or at low wages, and you bring in millions and millions more unemployed, willing to work even cheaper, you have millions more poor and unemployed. It makes no difference what race the immigrants are, the result is the same. Blacks have by far the highest number of unemployed with hispanics the second highest. Immigration does the most harm to the minorities.

There aren't millions coming in. You're inventing statistics again.
Yet again you're plainly trying to create tension between African American and Hispanic people.
Stroking up racist sentiment between minority groups is standard issue KKK playbook material. It's ugly and cynical.

madamenoire.com/450624/kkk-reaches-african-american-community-fight-illegal-immigration

 

[Benvolio]

There aren't millions coming in. You're inventing statistics again.
Yet again you're plainly trying to create tension between African American and Hispanic people.
Stroking up racist sentiment between minority groups is standard issue KKK playbook material. It's ugly and cynical.

madamenoire.com/450624/kkk-reaches-african-american-community-fight-illegal-immigration

We bring in more than a million every year legally and no one knows how many illegally. You are evading the issue. How does it help poor and unemployed blacks and Hispanics to bring in millions of more poor and unemployed willing to work cheaper? Your is the fallacy of ad hominem argument. Instead of addressing the issue you make a personal attack on the person you disagree with you.

 

[Kabluey]

We bring in more than a million year legally and no one knows how many illegally. You are evading the issue. How does it help poor and unemployed blacks and Hispanics to bring in millions of more poor and unemployed willing to work cheaper?

1 million immigrants is 0.3% - middling by international standards.
Immigrants make up 13% of the population, again relatively low.
Fact check: www.migrationpolicy.org/article/fre...tics-immigrants-and-immigration-united-states

You're scapegoating a tiny proportion of the population for wider economic problems yet again.
And yet again you're hinting that the boogie man of illegal immigration is terrifyingly more than legal immigration, without a hint of evidence which suits your conspiracy.

Ad hominem attacks aren't those that criticise the actions of another. Thought you threw around the term often enough to know that.

 

[LittleDove]

You use accusations of race to deflect discussion of the effects on unemployment, wages, crime, environment, education, health care, welfare.

This is pretty rich coming from someone who has consistently referred to the president of his country by the name of Hussein.

 

[luckynumbah7]

This is pretty rich coming from someone who has consistently referred to the president of his country by the name of Hussein.

Five bucks says he's gonna come back with "But but but....It's his middle name!"

As if his middle name wasn't being deliberately associated with someone being hunted as a terrorist. It's cheap, but it certainly hasn't been beneath Ben before.

 

[Zeno Lorea]

1 million immigrants is 0.3% - middling by international standards.
Immigrants make up 13% of the population, again relatively low.

It's not low, it's average. Most countries in Western Europe have 10-15% immigrants. But your point that 13% of the population is not responsible for the broad economic problems still stands. The problems are structural in nature.

 

[frankfrank]

Once he said that in the old days, protestors 'would have been taken out on stretchers'

Codespeak for "I long for the good old days, in my homeland, where protestors were taken out on stretchers, and put into our camps."

 

[jbrown329]

Trump Rally No Joking Matter

I almost missed it. I saw this photo of 2 young men holding a Trump sign at a Trump rally in my Facebook feed, which disappointed me, and I was ready to move on to better things, when I saw that the fella posting the photo (Jordan Ray Correll) had written: “DO NOT JUST SCROLL PAST THIS PICTURE WITHOUT READING THIS POST FIRST. THANK YOU.”

As a result of his comment I decided to take the time to read what he had posted about his experience, and I realized that my initial assumptions about the photo had been incorrect.

What Jordan wrote both frightened and inspired me. It frightened me because it clearly illustrated to me what a terribly dangerous thing the Donald Trump candidacy has become. It inspired me because it showed me the great wisdom this young man had in writing about his experience!

KOS

 

[TickTockMan]

...and to think 33% of the "berns" would actually vote for this guy.......

You are making shit up. 33% of Bernie supports won't vote for Hillary. That is not a vote for Trump. The world is not black and white as you seem to think.

 

[eastofeden]

You are making shit up. 33% of Bernie supports won't vote for Hillary. That is not a vote for Trump. The world is not black and white as you seem to think.

It actually IS black and white. Not voting for whoever the Democratic nominee is is definitely a vote for Trump..directly or indirectly..and one poll has it at 20% of the Bernie voters DO support Trump...so that leaves 13% who Trump will easily appeal to given "anti establishment" is the name of the game.