The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Who would you be disappointed in seeing in a career ending scandal?

m1thousand

m1thousand

JUB Addict
Joined
Jun 28, 2013
Posts
6,651
Reaction score
147
Points
63
Location
Vancouver area
What person would you hate to see in a scandal that ended their career?


Janet Jackson
Jennifer Lopez
 
RuPaul (only thought of that because of the guy who was eliminated for catfishing)
 
I don't give a fuck about anyone, go figure about their stupid "career" as... what exactly.

f89ec896c45ae2a8ae3b10450c9f85c8.gif


Whatever Searle, for example, said of minimally clever, is always there as fine or as stupid, for as long as there is a record of it, so who cares what he did as Lecherous Old Groper.

That may be the fundamental part of my disgust of people in general: they do not think of you or appreciate you for what you are, but for what they take you to be, that is, for how you fit in their programmed vision of what they like, they FANCY people (included themselves) to be.



:rolleyes: :cool:
 
the gays that represent us politically - like Anderson Cooper - Rachel Maddow - Andy Cohn - Robin Roberts - Dan Savage - RuPaul - and most of all Mayor Pete
 
Be reduced to one single, pure stereotype... or the opposite one.
 
The people I care about, namely people who do not intentionally harm others, or are hateful.

Most people.
 
NotHardUp1 said:
The people I care about, namely people who do not intentionally harm others, or are hateful.

Most people.
Click to expand...

You mean you take the former to be the same as the latter? :roll:


And that without entering into the "plain invisible" fact of how much more hurtful is "unintentional" harm... precisely because that is the most common, and harms not only by itself, but by unintentionally, unawarely propping intentional harm.
 
Probably Keanu Reeves and that is it. I don't have any expectations or would be disappointed by anyone else.
 
NotHardUp1 said:
The people I care about, namely people who do not intentionally harm others, or are hateful.

Most people.
Click to expand...

The "harm" that "most people" often resent, is merely the one that they happily ignored until someone pointed it out to them and, therefore, said mere third-party someone becomes a "harmful" person.
 
can't believe it but I agree with belamo--- as far as I can understand what he is saying.
 
I will say that I will disappointed if there isn’t a career ending scandal for JK Rowling.
 
I would be disappointed if Dolly Parton turned out to be a serial killer, or David Attenborough was revealed as a paedophile.
 
ClubLevelVegan said:
I will say that I will disappointed if there isn’t a career ending scandal for JK Rowling.
Click to expand...

She's doing a good job at it.

And with that I'll answer with someone she's mad at. Stephen King.
 
ClubLevelVegan said:
I will say that I will disappointed if there isn’t a career ending scandal for JK Rowling.
Click to expand...

Really just because she said what many people think---The cool thing about trans is they are a blend of both---they are not biologically woman so whats the big deal---what culture police force tells people what to think------I mean of all the people---JK Rowling? she has done so much for so many issues that are important--including the gay community---its so ridiculous----she is saying what a lot of feminist woman are saying about trans---and its not a negative its just science ...biology.
 
^ Thinking about mc's thread about racism and the definition of a racist, Rowling merely showed her and other millions of people's "blind spot" in relation to trans people. She considers it something like a whim of choice, like a taste for a particular way of living...

She could have been incensed by the identification of womanhood with menstruation: she could have pointed out that you do not stop being a woman after menopause (she's over 50 herself, by the way), which is the traditional, male-centered, procreation-focused understanding of womanhood and, then, she could have stood for trans recognition but... no, she opted to grab and wield bloody vaginas to TRY to defend the cause of both womanhood and reasonable speech.
 
nycguydowntown said:
Really just because she said what many people think---The cool thing about trans is they are a blend of both---they are not biologically woman so whats the big deal---what culture police force tells people what to think------I mean of all the people---JK Rowling? she has done so much for so many issues that are important--including the gay community---its so ridiculous----she is saying what a lot of feminist woman are saying about trans---and its not a negative its just science ...biology.
Click to expand...

She just recently said that transitioning for a Trans person is like Conversion Therapy. And quoted some know nothing who said that people who go through mental health issues that rely on medicine are “too lazy” to heal themselves.

The stuff she is spouting is factually incorrect and it doesn’t excuse her just because she has done some good things. She constantly quotes or follows people who specifically leave out the T when it comes to the acronym. I’m not trying to police her thoughts and generally don’t care what people think unless it is things like this and she uses her platform to push this kind of nonsense.
 
^ Well, it was not her insightfulness what brought her to wealth and social prominence... it hardly ever is.

Actually... :cool: :rolleyes: :mrgreen:
 
ClubLevelVegan said:
She just recently said that transitioning for a Trans person is like Conversion Therapy. And quoted some know nothing who said that people who go through mental health issues that rely on medicine are “too lazy” to heal themselves.

The stuff she is spouting is factually incorrect and it doesn’t excuse her just because she has done some good things. She constantly quotes or follows people who specifically leave out the T when it comes to the acronym. I’m not trying to police her thoughts and generally don’t care what people think unless it is things like this and she uses her platform to push this kind of nonsense.
Click to expand...

I think what she was saying was misinterpreted but there are a lot of doctors who think hormone therapy and surgery are used too often and too soon---which is what I thought she as saying--hormone therapy can be dangerous---she isn't saying anything that radical and only time will tell if we are jumping the gun when we start treating 5 year olds with hormones----but if you are not 100% behind hormones and surgery you are going to be pounced on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top