The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

why are indian men so underrated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter refujiunderground
  • Start date Start date
"…the country that gave the world the Kama Sutra…has some of the most conservative social rules this side of Saudi Arabia on kissing in public" and very vigorous pelvic-thrusting in their dancing
Richard Gere and Shilpa Shetty Kissing Scandal? « Divanee Magazine Editors Blog

I think that you may be getting the age-old caste-system mixed up with Saudi-Arabia conservetism , as India has been
a country long before the British jumped in and plundered it to almost non-existence , just think of the salt-tax .
Wheras Saudi-Arabia was not a sovereign country until after the 2nd world war
 
Uh huh. And this is coming from the guy who spends 90% of the time bashing on all immigrants in the CE&P forum...

False. My objection is to the immigration, not to the immigrants. You have never been able to grasp the difference. With 14 million unemployed we should not be bring in millions and millions of more unemployed. You believe that immigrants are more important than mere Americans, so you pretend that Conservative objection is based on race, xenophobia, negativism.
Existing immigrants are among the victims of new immigration as they also must compete with the newest for jobs and salaries.
 
Ok about kissing,

poor country DON'T kiss due to hygiene/smell/yuck factor because they can't afford to brush their teeth.
Only the rich or the clean mouths kiss.
 
False. My objection is to the immigration, not to the immigrants. You have never been able to grasp the difference. With 14 million unemployed we should not be bring in millions and millions of more unemployed. You believe that immigrants are more important than mere Americans, so you pretend that Conservative objection is based on race, xenophobia, negativism.
Existing immigrants are among the victims of new immigration as they also must compete with the newest for jobs and salaries.

I can see the point of view. However, if we were to be isolationists...we couldn't afford to do it on such a drastic scale as banning new immigration - it would mess with the population metric. (one of the main reasons that the D. Of State and INS have the quota set where it is).
 
I have never said I wanted legal immigrants deported. But we need to stop all immigration except special doctors, scientists. All immigrants take jobs from Americans and lower wages. You just do not care about Americans.
 
I'd love John Abraham to fuck me raw...same goes for Upen Patel, though imo he's less attractive than John.
 
I don't care about race or color, if you look good, you look good.
 
I love Indian guys.

Use cam4 to judge the popularity of different types of guys based on the chat even if they never show. Indian guys always fill the rooms up and are on page 1. But they are sort of rare.
 
Indian men do have the smallest penises of any race so... there is that.

Indian is not a race... and it's not true anyway:

http://www.justusboys.com/forum/gay-porn-hot-guys/370292-south-asian-men-indian-pakistani-etc.html


India is not a very sexual culture , do some homework , they fucking wrote the Kama-Sutra , they also have tranvestite cults
who will go and dance and bless heterosexual marriages .

Well that's not what modern India is like post-Mughal and European rule. Also, hijras (transgender) are only tolerated when they crash weddings because kicking them out is apparently bad luck and Hindus are very superstitious (even the "educated" ones are).


I think that you may be getting the age-old caste-system mixed up with Saudi-Arabia conservetism , as India has been
a country long before the British jumped in and plundered it to almost non-existence , just think of the salt-tax .
Wheras Saudi-Arabia was not a sovereign country until after the 2nd world war

Actually, India was never a real country until 1947 when British left and made it one. Before South Asia was just tons of separate kingdoms and "India" was a word Western Europeans used to refer to all of South Asia and even Southeast Asia too.


That was more to do with richard gere,s comments than anything else , and you did a pretty good job of tripping yourself up there
Their culture is as oppresive as Saudi-Arabia , BUT they have very vigorous pelvic-thrusting in their dancing .
May i suggest some education and a magazine clip defo does not count .

Before you post anymore such Drivel .

Not really. Hindu culture is traditionally pretty liberal and promotes acceptance of other ideas. That's why practically everyone in Asia went there for refuge historically. When many Jews and Zoroastrians were hounded out of western Asia, they settled in India.


Because many Indians view kissing as a sexual act. It's bascially vaginal penetration of the face. Even I get uncomfortable when people kiss in public. I have been brought it with the mentality that kissing is just too sensual.

Most Indians don't even know how to french kiss anyway lol.


I've hooked up with a few.

nice bodies, but most of them had shit personalities (racist, stuck-up)

(not that it's a reflection on the entire subcontinent, that was just my experience with the handful of gay Indians I encountered)

The stuck-up part is definitely a result of deep insecurities (probably the racism as well). Many Indians and and other Asians suffer from a deep inferiority complex and when they try combat it by covering it up they come off as arrogant.
 
^
Gian. You seem to see everything in extremes. You do everything in Reduction Ad Absurdem .
 
You've said it plenty of times and you're now being dishonest. All immigrants take jobs from Americans? You don't know anything about this issue. I care about Americans you do not. You vote republican, therefore showing your lack of regard. This country needs immigration or it'll fall apart. And you can thank immigrants for the low food costs you have.

You lie. I defy you to show me an instance in which i said that legal immigrants should be deported. I did not.
 
You've consistently slammed legal and illegal immigrants alike in the CE&P forum. This is fact. You have wanted legal immigrants gone because you have this distorted notion that they are taking jobs away from "Americans". Real Americans were the Natives that were pushed to those reservations living in sub-standard conditions.

You lie. I have never said that legal immigrants shouldbe deported.

See how dismissive you are of Americans. To you they don 't count. You put Americans in qotes to imply that there is no suh thing, they aren't real. Only immigrants are important.
Native Americans like other Americans have been and are being hurt by the flood of immigrants, taking jobs and pulling wages down.
 
LOL where am I dismissive of Americans? The real Americans sit on reservations throughout this country and you don't care. They were here before the Europeans. Get real. And the flood of immigrants aren't bringing the wages down, it's the guys on wall street.

So to you the rest of us are not Americans, huh? I do care about Native Americans who have to compete with immigrants for jobs with wages pulled down. You not care about anyone but immigrants. And no, they do not "sit" on resvations. Some live there but many more live among the general populations and many, many millions of Americans are partly Native American.
 
Where did i mention Modern India , even though the British made India and Saudia Arabia countries only after the 2nd world war , i noticed in your diatribe no mention of the salt-taxes , or the fact that the Migration of 75% of Hindus , because Pakistan decided that
they wanted their own Muslim State . Why make part of my post bold ? I suggest you read that post again as it was in reply to
one as idiotic as this . So why not go back to your Thesis , i smell FAIL in the air . Have a lovely day .
 
I hate to break-up the lovefest between Giancarlo and Benvolio,

-BUT-

I want to clarify that "Indians" refer to people or their descendants from India, the Indian subcontinent, or South Asia.

Don't confuse this with "Native Americans" which are the people who lived in North America prior to the arrival of the Europeans in the 1500s-1700s.

Referring to Native Americans as "Indians" is inaccurate, thanks to Christopher Columbus' mistake of thinking he went to India when he really landed in the Caribbean.
 
That's why I repeatedly referred to them as Native Americans and not once as Indians. :D Nice try though.

I know the difference. It was a whole confusion as the Europeans thought they landed in India.

Stop trying to create an issue where there is none.

I know you knew the difference. My comment was aimed more at Benvolio.
 
That's why I repeatedly referred to them as Native Americans and not once as Indians. :D Nice try though.

I know the difference. It was a whole confusion as the Europeans thought they landed in India.

Stop trying to create an issue where there is none.

Giancarlo , could i kiss your arse as well , Promise you will like me eventually . :twisted:
 
Where did I call them Indians? I consistently referred to them as Native Americans. But, if you haven't noticed, many of them refer to themselves as Indians out of habit and it is a more convenient word. Ever hear of the American Indian Movement? It is not a slur and should not be turned into one. We all know that the Italian who discovered America and the Spaniards who looted and killed them so ruthlessly thought they were in the "Indies" for awhile, but the word is too deeply established to ignore it. Ever hear of Indiana or Indianapolis or Indianola?
 
I hate to break-up the lovefest between Giancarlo and Benvolio,

-BUT-

I want to clarify that "Indians" refer to people or their descendants from India, the Indian subcontinent, or South Asia.

Don't confuse this with "Native Americans" which are the people who lived in [STRIKE]North America[/STRIKE] the United States prior to the arrival of the Europeans in the 1500s-1700s.

Referring to Native Americans as "Indians" is inaccurate, thanks to Christopher Columbus' mistake of thinking he went to India when he really landed in the Caribbean.

Fixed that for you. The people you're referring to in Canada are Aboriginal, or, preferably, Cree, Inuit, Dene, Mohawk, Kootenay, Salish etc....
 
Aboriginal may be technically correct, but it is kind of an ugly word. Are you sure the want to be called that? Do they objact to Indian?
 
Back
Top