>>>As for what we should call effeminate men, you tell me. If a guy acts like a woman and have the same psychology of a woman, how much of a man he is because he has a penis?
You can't win an argument with a person who sets the definitions wherever he chooses. We've already ascertained that your definition of "gay" differs from at least 98% of the people on this board (and, I'd argue, 98% of people in general). So long as you can set the definitions as you see fit, I don't see me making any headway in an argument against you. But then again, that's hardly my purpose in continuing this thread, is it?
My personal belief? So long as he's got the dangly bits, he's a man. He can shoot the effeminate meter into the red, he can dress like a woman 100% of the time, but he's still a man. You might argue that he's isn't "manly" at all, and I wouldn't argue that. But there's a reason we say things like "manly man" - it suggest the noun might need the adjective.
My father would occasionally tell me to "be a man", but it never had anything to do with masculinity. He never said it if he found me crying or doing something that might be deemed effeminate. He only said it when he thought I was acting childish, or shirking responsibility. When he'd say "be a man", it would be used interchangeably with "man up" - be an adult, and do the right thing. And that's something even the most effeminate guy can do.
Lex