It's a good topic for a thread, I think.
I agree most with Norri about poetic license. Threats, flaws, heroes and villains are all exaggerated, accelerated, and concentrated. It's the method of the 90-minute medium.
As for businesses folding post-pandemic, that is ok. Many of them handled it all badly. For others, their business case simply wasn't strong enough. Small businesses do fail a lot. Many that should have before did not because they could coast along on minimal effort with a customer base that had little alternative. That's no longer the case.
To Dominus' point, I strongly agree with him that our conflict is much exaggerated over reality. In times of disaster, overwhelmingly we pull together and help our neighbors, far sooner than the government can act. Bad actors like the merchants who price gouge generators or the customers who hoard everything, are still the exception, and a small minority.
And, gun ownership in the U.S. is STILL less than half:
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/09/13/key-facts-about-americans-and-guns/
Whereas that may be "saturation" in the same sense that 20% of citizens drinking might be a high percentage, it isn't true literally even if the research is missing undeclared guns. Most gun owners are proud to declare, other than felons.
If there were a real EMP detonation, there would be communication soon enough that the impact was nationwide, etc., and there would indeed be survivalists who would raid stores, hoard every commodity possible, ally with militias, and retreat from community. When and if that ever occurs, the rest of us will band together and do our best to survive or fail together, to make non-aggression treaties with the fearful, and attempt to kill all the others before they kill us.
I need to find an interview with the Obamas explaining their purpose. I have to assume it is a values clarification exercise, intentionally planted ahead of the election.