The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Why Do We Love Serial Killers ?

1) I am calm. Just simply asking a question that needed to be asked.......

2) Meeting is quite a bit different than hanging out with a person. Meeting infers just that...... Meeting. As in walking down the street and crossing paths with, or being introduced to the individual..... That is meeting someone (not meeting up with, which is quite different). Hanging out with implies some level of friendship as you are actually spending time with the person. The two are not the same, unless a dinghy is comparable to a luxury yacht in your vocabulary?

Just say you are a crime scene investigator.
Clear and to the point ;)
 
A fascinating case is that of Loeb And Leopold, diagnosed with antisocial disorder but with unusual history. Both outside the mainstream with genius IQs, far ahead of their peers in school, extremely wealthy with servants including nannies, and Jewish at a time when there was more ostracism. Leopold -and probably Loeb was gay while Loeb had an obsession with being a master criminal. They agreed that Leopold would follow Loeb in crime and in return, Loeb would allow frottage by Leopold. Loeb claimed to be straight but selected male oriented crimes; several burglaries of fraternity houses and finally the murder of Bobby Franks for no reason, without compunction and apparently without ever remorse for the boy. Police suspected that they also had castrated another young man. Loeb was slashed to death in prison by an inmate who claimed Loeb propositioned him.
They were not serial killers but Loeb at least was obsessed with crime which probably would have continued.

Two very handsome devils.

tumblr_nzig16L9tY1rvm4amo1_1280.jpg
 
Just say what ever and stop beating around the bush.
Just say how you got to meet over 10 serial killers .....

It is nonsense, that is why. Claiming they never amounted to anything implies more than just a meeting. His story is full of holes and we barely know a thing about it.
 
The attraction which some women have for serial killers, even to the extent of marrying them in prison and before execution, is a somewhat different problem than the interest most people have for them. I suspect part of it is the unconscious feeling by women that a serial killer who rapes and kills women is somehow super-sexed, super virile. Some may simply be seeking attention and fame.
 
Just say what ever and stop beating around the bush.
Just say how you got to meet over 10 serial killers .....

Through the process of life our paths crossed. We met...... There isn't any more to tell really.

Do people really not understand this weird phenomenon of simply meeting a stranger as one goes about his life?
 
JeffreyDahmer.jpg


- - - Updated - - -

Through the process of life our paths crossed. We met...... There isn't any more to tell really.

Do people really not understand this weird phenomenon of simply meeting a stranger as one goes about his life?

We understand weird phenomena.

But most of us also understand mathematical possibilities.
 
I've met no less than 10 serial killers in my life thus far. They never amounted to anything, never got any media attention or anything like that before they "retired".

On an open forum such a statement, when questioned by members, requires an honest reply.

Either you are using some sort of twisted humour and amusing yourself at our lack of ability to understand the meaning of your statement or it is not factual.

At least you must admit that the second sentence in your comment is extremely obtuse and seemingly aimed at confusing any reader about the truth of your first statement.

By stating that you have "met" several serial killers you imply some form of interaction with them however slight (be it just an introduction rather than just passing them in a corridor). It also implies that you knew they were serial killers either before or after the event.

Therefore I think it only correct that you formulate some sort of response to members doubting the verity of your comments.
 
On an open forum such a statement, when questioned by members, requires an honest reply.

Either you are using some sort of twisted humour and amusing yourself at our lack of ability to understand the meaning of your statement or it is not factual.

At least you must admit that the second sentence in your comment is extremely obtuse and seemingly aimed at confusing any reader about the truth of your first statement.

By stating that you have "met" several serial killers you imply some form of interaction with them however slight (be it just an introduction rather than just passing them in a corridor). It also implies that you knew they were serial killers either before or after the event.

Therefore I think it only correct that you formulate some sort of response to members doubting the verity of your comments.

Well, if one has met a larger number of Germans (living in Western Germany, or elsewhere except the Eastern block) who were born after abt 1880 and before abt 1923 chances are very high that one has met the one or the other mass murderer who has been never prosecuted.

And it's not completely unlikely, that some of them were additionally serial killers, I suppose.
 
Just imagine how a narcissist relishes all the attention they get.
 
Well, if one has met a larger number of Germans (living in Western Germany, or elsewhere except the Eastern block) who were born after abt 1880 and before abt 1923 chances are very high that one has met the one or the other mass murderer who has been never prosecuted.

And it's not completely unlikely, that some of them were additionally serial killers, I suppose.

I understand the logic behind your comments but it doesn't fit the situation with which we were presented. The member stated clearly that he had met serial killers; in your scenario we are meeting people who might have been but we would be totally unaware of it.




Though I doubt we will get any real clarification I do believe we have the right to demand it.
 
Willie Boy has no choice now but to tell us how he met over 10 serial killers :lol:
 
People are not born with the sociopath gene.

As peeonme posted, that is not a scientific assertion.

There certainly are people who were born with physical abnormalities that are attributed to psychopathy, which is often described as sociopathy.

As to the allegation by Willieboy that anyone has ever met 10 serial killers, that sort of hyperbole belongs in the pics-or-it-didn't-happen pile.
 
I read about a lot of serial killers especially the ones that people consider gay/bisexual; but are not gay or bi since they are ped0s in some cases, and into sick stuff like being a necrophile, or people like Randy Kraft, Andrew Cunanan, John Wayne Gacy, William Bonin, Fritz Haarmann, Albert Fish, and others. At first it was for shock value, and then I would wonder why someone would be that way?
 
Back
Top