The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Why Does Anyone Care? {VP Nominee}

  • Thread starter Thread starter falconfan
  • Start date Start date
So Our life span is longer now then it was 232 years ago ?

I am reading here that Jmac will be dead before his term is up ??

Look at this Age at Death

John Adams 33,108d (90y 247d)
Thomas Jefferson 30,386d (83y 82d)
James Madison 31,139d (85y 104d)
James Monroe 26,729d (73y 67d)
John Q. Adams 29,466d (80y 227d)
Andrew Jackson 28,574d (78y 85d)
Martin Van Buren 29,085d (79y 231d)
James Buchanan 28,163d (77y 39d)
Herbert Hoover 32,943d (90y 71d)
Harry S, Truman 32,373d (88y 232d)
Dwight D. Eisenhower 28,654d (78y 165d)
Richard Nixon 29,688d (81y 103d
Gerald Ford 34,133d (93y 165d)
Ronald Regan 34,133d (93y 165d)

George H.W.Bush (still alive ) 30,779d (84y 98d)
Jimmy Carter (still alive ) 30,668d (83y 353d)

That is 16 outa 43 presidents that have lived or still are living past the age that JMac will be after his 1st term.

We live longer now then even 40 years ago.

JMac's Mother is still alive Age ,,,96 ?

Odds of Jmac LIVING ???? I would say Pretty Damn Good !!

Your argument is that 37% of US Presidents lived older than John McCain? Sounds like bad odds to me. How many of the 16 had recurrent cancer, history of heart disease and had been POWs for over 5 years?

The overall point has nothing to do with Bill Clinton or any other US President. If elected, John McCain will be the oldest man EVER to be inaugurated as US President. His health is a matter of national concern, and he owes it to his nation to be completely open about his health and medical history.

And he also owes it to his nation to have a VP nominee with substantive credentials to take on the role of President if he becomes incapacitated.
 
^ Exactly. There is no correlation between past President's longevity and future President's longevity. It's like saying my next boyfriend will cheat on me because my past boyfriends cheated on me - none of them have anything to do with one another. Letme's statistic is meaningless in any logical comparison.
 
R.A.

LOOK at what I Posted about age ^^^200 years ago the life ex was like 60yrs or even less.Shit maybe 40.
Life Exp. don't mean shit. John Adams was 91(almost) He was born in 1735 !!!

Yep I guess he had no stress being the 2ND prez of the country.

The secrecy about his health records ? No Idea . What was WJC's problem with releasing his records when asked ?

Average life expectancy means a lot. On average, today, an American male can expect to live 74 years. Some more, some less, but on average, 74 years.

It's erroneous for you to think that being President does anything to extend a person's longevity. Those 16 Presidents you cited had the luck to beat the odds. And, as I and many others see it, McCain's history quite naturally raises the concern of whether he'll live-out his term should he be elected.
 
Ohhh, nice return serve andy. chance, got anything left, or are you going to admit the truth?


i got plenty left

andy is a responsible poster who makes responsible posts

u on the other hand and sir les DON'T qualify there

i disagree with andy and think bringing up mccain's age and using it as a weapon against his candidacy is akin to bringing up the color of BO's skin

but he makes valid points in a usually reasonable manner so we will have to agree to disagree

not sure what ur excuse is
 
Fact is fact *shrug* No need to make a correlation between my agreement with Sir Les' post and Germans hypnotized by Hilter.

I don't agree with all of the post, but the facts in it yes, of course.

u wrote and i quote "great post" to his drivel

period

no " agree with this - not with that"

soooooooooo

u own it

and i think sir les attack on john mccain and his age is very hitler/germany appropriate

and i think the "im a liberal" (his response) is lamer than the original spew
 
Since when has a possible vice president been such a big deal? I mean really? Why the fuck is everyone talking about the crazy Alaskan cessation bitch? They've completely succeeded in takes the buzz out of Obama's corner (which is a problem because it was one of the best things he had going for him) and for what? I can't remember a time when anyone's ever cared so much about a VICE presidential NOMINEE. The media needs to just STFU and move on.

Based on what you've stated, it sounds like the position of vice president should be eliminated. No need for it. It serves no purpose. No meaning. And certainly we have no need to observe any of "vice presidential" candidates both past and present.
 
i got plenty left

andy is a responsible poster who makes responsible posts

u on the other hand and sir les DON'T qualify there

i disagree with andy and think bringing up mccain's age and using it as a weapon against his candidacy is akin to bringing up the color of BO's skin

but he makes valid points in a usually reasonable manner so we will have to agree to disagree

not sure what ur excuse is

Let me say this now....

I DID NOT USE IT AS A WEAPON AGAINST MCCAIN!!!!!

I stated the sad truth that he is old, he has had often LETHAL diseases several times within his life, and that he was in VIETNAM from which the majority of soldiers returned either dead or broken in some way. I'd hate to see the heartless son of a bitch who could go through that and come out in one piece.

chance, might I just mention that MANY Republicans have used, which was recorded by journalists and/or the beautiful thing called the 'Video Camera' McCain's time within Vietnam, most especially his time as a POW, as an excuse for his flops.

And there is no right for anyone to discriminate, and we are not doing that. We are pointing out what people tend not to admit : POLITICIANS DIE JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE and that : MCCAIN IS FAR MORE LIKELY TO DIE WHILE IN OFFICE THEN OBAMA.

Thank you, I'll be here for the rest of my life ..|


Can we please get back on topic now???(seriously though, McCains health was a sidenote) If we wanna chat about McCain's health, can we please do it in a relevant thread?
 
You lost seconds of your life typing that drivel... seconds you will never get back. Oh shit.. I am doing the same thing right now! #-o

It happens to the best of us... and of course the rest of us, myself included. ;)
 
McCain's age is NOT a "side issue" to this thread, which is about asking why anyone cares about the VP race. It is, in fact, the exact answer to the thread's question. We care about the nomination of that evil, fundie nutjob because McCain's age and health make it WAY TOO LIKELY that he could die in office and make that ignorant Alaskan horror the President of the United States, which would be a catastrophe for the entire world.

So it's not off-topic; it IS the topic.

Oh there is a potential Fascist posting in this thread, but it isn't me; it's Chance1, who characterizes Obama's race as equivilent to McCain's age and health. Yet McCain's age and health DO reflect on his ability to hold, execute, and survive the office. Obama's race is relevant only to racial bigots (Like, say, Nazis), and in no way impacts his fitness for office. Why, I wonder, does Chance1 think Obama's race is something that can be used against him, unless HE thinks it's a bad thing?

The conservatives are trying to make McCain's age and health "off-limits" because there's no way to answer the fact that he is physically unfit for office. So they say we're bad for bringing it up. But they don't get to determine the debate. This isn't one of Bush's "Town Halls" where everyone is carefully vetted beforehand to make sure they won't ask anything that points out how evil they are.

Obama's race isn't "off limits" either; it's merely irrelevant. McCain's age is not irrelevant at all.

Chance1 has had to resort to attempting to trivialize my arguments because he has no answer for them. When you can't counter the facts, attack the messenger. It's a pure Karl Rove/Joseph Goebbles tactic.
 
Your logic stumps me. Truly. You should see my face.

You are right indeed: using mccain's "age" (his health actually) as a "weapon" (as a factual concern actually) "against his candidacy" (because Sarah Palin would be POTUS at, his God forbid, demise actually) is equivalent to playing the race card with Obama *nods fervently* Soooo true.

Age, for me anyway, has nothing to do with it. His running mate has everything to do with it. Note the thread title... offtopic:




You lost seconds of your life typing that drivel... seconds you will never get back. Oh shit.. I am doing the same thing right now! #-o

to answer ur ................

1 - i will pass but thanks

2 - couple seconds

overall - mccain's age was attacked in an us vs. them diatribe by sir less - glafna has done the same - others have as well

u responded to sir less with "jolly good job"

so my response

what part of that u don't get is mystifying

but i've got a giants game to go to so i cannot waste "any more seconds" here

:wave:
 
See what I mean? He couldn't answer my points, so he chickened out, and used watching a children's game as an excuse.
 
to answer ur ................

1 - i will pass but thanks

2 - couple seconds

overall - mccain's age was attacked in an us vs. them diatribe by sir less - glafna has done the same - others have as well

u responded to sir less with "jolly good job"

so my response

what part of that u don't get is mystifying

but i've got a giants game to go to so i cannot waste "any more seconds" here

:wave:

chance, all your doing is making yourself look like an idiot.

My suggestion, READ THE FUCKING POSTS, and comment to ALL OF THEM. NOT just what you can use to insult people.
 
chance, all your doing is making yourself look like an idiot.

My suggestion, READ THE FUCKING POSTS, and comment to ALL OF THEM. NOT just what you can use to insult people.

dude

u really need to CHILL - the CAPS r for u who thinks they're necessary i guess

i know canada is a really lonely place but i can't help u there

u still have hockey and a lotta snow so cheer up

and if u get attacked, the u.s. will defend ........... promise

so hang in
 
dude

u really need to CHILL - the CAPS r for u who thinks they're necessary i guess

i know canada is a really lonely place but i can't help u there

u still have hockey and a lotta snow so cheer up

and if u get attacked, the u.s. will defend ........... promise

so hang in

I use caps to accentuate the key terms in a post when it's getting annoyingly obvious that your ignoring them.

And seriously... who the fuck will openly attack Canada??? That would be just plain stupid. The US wouldn't have to do anything... their neighbors will whoop their asses at home while we whoop em here.
 
I use caps to accentuate the key terms in a post when it's getting annoyingly obvious that your ignoring them.

And seriously... who the fuck will openly attack Canada??? That would be just plain stupid. The US wouldn't have to do anything... their neighbors will whoop their asses at home while we whoop em here.

the attacking canada thingy was ................ what i thought was an obvious joke

sarcasm we call it :rolleyes:

and the CAPS thingy is just plain bad

just a heads up
 
Back
Top