Why I had my nude pictures thread deleted

[Kyanimal]

A smacked arse would be very nice though,

May I stand in for Ron until he returns?

 

[RonR18]

Okay no point by point breakdown, it's just a totally unrelated gif,

A smacked arse would be very nice though,

Although that's a cute gif, Bender, and cows that milk themselves are every farmer's dream, it promotes animal cruelty, in that there's no banana slices included in the cereal. And once the gif is widely disseminated, tens of millions of people will erroneously believe that cows don't require bananas in their diet, which will inevitably result in countless cows being deprived of this vital fruit.

So bend over my lap boy, because this huge oversight on your part demands an appropriate punishment.

*Pulls Bender's boxers down to his ankles and proceeds to smack his arse*

That forum is no-flame zone, yeah?

On the other hand, they could've simply been using their hands to do other things at the time....

RE: "That forum is no-flame zone, yeah?"

Yeah.

RE: "On the other hand, they could've simply been using their hands to do other things at the time."

Yep, that's one theory that's been floated around, butt I don't think it holds much cum.

Here's my take, and I'm sure I'll get a lot of hate pm's and replies.

JustUsBoys is one of the worst places to post a thread and expect meaningful feedbacks. Think of this place as like the rain forest. Believe it or not, the soil in the rain forest doesn't have that much nutrients simply because the cycle of life in the rain forest works really fast.

JustUsBoys gets a lot of threads started everyday, but only a few will have a lot of responses. This is an inevitable result of such a heavily populated place. People are not really personal here.

The last time I voiced this opinion of mine I got half a dozen pm's telling me to shut up. So, if you want to get more responses, perhaps you should consider provoking them to?

This thread pertains to just my deceased pic thread, and I agree, when only a few people out of 160+ regular viewers are willing to post feedback, your description is pretty accurate. Although it wouldn't surprise me if viewer participation in similar forums is worse.

Those who did not post comments, maybe they practiced what their parents taught them: "If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all."

Butt that would defy logic, because 160+ people clicked on the thread every time a post was made to it. So they obviously "had something nice to say," or they wouldn't have been so eager for more pics. I initially thought they might be following the thread just because they thought I was making a fool out of myself, and they enjoyed watching that kind of spectacle unfold.

Butt thinking back about the type of feedback I did get, I seriously doubt that any of those 160+ viewers didn't like the content. I believe the silent majority just wants to protect their computer monitor from being blasted into oblivion by a bolt of lightning crashing through their roof. Which is undoubtedly what they think will happen if they ever tell someone they like their pictures.

You really have issue's dude, this is exactly what your whining about, but look how many comments you have now. Talk about trolling FOR comments.. With 4 pag's of comments you still were'nt satisfied You should be lucky you got one. But I guess you wanted 8 pg's of comment's. But I think even a 100 pg's would not have been enough.

RE: "You really have issue's dude"

At the risk of coming across as slightly sarcastic...duh.

RE: "this is exactly what your whining about"

No one seems to be "whining" in this thread butt you.

RE: "Talk about trolling FOR comments"

You're saying that because I made this thread to let people know what happened to my pic thread, and then responded to the people who posted comments, that makes me a troll? Wow. Just like your initial post, I don't even know where to begin with a statement as nonsensical as that.

RE: "With 4 pag's of comments you still were'nt satisfied"

It's got nothing to do with being "satisfied." It has to do with the perception of mass rejection from getting 117 views to a posting in 10 hours with zero feedback, and the fact that I have psychological issues about rejection due to growing up with psychotic parents from hell.

RE: "But I think even a 100 pg's would not have been enough"

Haha, despite the spanking I gave you for making a monkey out of yourself, you still haven't bothered to read my response to Corny. Because if you had, you'd know that a comment from just ONE of those 117 people would have kept my pic thread alive.

Oh, and in regards to the pic of those monkeys you posted, which one are you...the one on the left?

Ron you need to seek professional help for low self esteem issues. No matter how many guys give your pix a thumbs up it will never convince you of your self worth.

You're probably right, butt just one thumbs up during that 10 hour period I mentioned would have kept my pic thread alive.

^ The complaints weren't about thumbs up or thumbs down. The complaints were about too many people just looking and not giving them. It was all about a lack of attention.

Actually, it's about getting zero feedback from 117 people for my last posting, over a 10 hour period.

I KNEW That! And, I'm fairly sure that YOU Knew that I Knew that, too!

Your clarification was still appreciated, though, since I guess you couldn't have been Sure!

Stats/Numbers cumming UP in a bit ... (I hope).

Keep smilin'!!
Chaz


"Animal" LIKES It when people are Kind to him!

RE: "I KNEW That! And, I'm fairly sure that YOU Knew that I Knew that, too!"

Yep, I knew that you knew that I knew that you knew...I was just pulling your animal.

RE: "Animal" LIKES It when people are Kind to him!"

I don't blame him for liking attention. I believe everyone should be kind to animals and pat them on their little heads on a regular basis.

May I stand in for Ron until he returns?

Back off...I'm Bender's official JustUsBoys disciplinarian!

 

[RonR18]

Ron being completely overdramatic?

Oh wow, and water's wet too. DAMN, this is a crazy day!

Huh? A gay man who's "over dramatic?" OMG, who could have anticipated such an incredible anomaly!

 

[RonR18]

Don't blame it on the gay. It's all you, bro.

Okay, I'll take your word for it since you're the official, undisputed JUB expert on all matters related to being gay.

 

[Kabluey]

 

[Kyanimal]

O.K.! While keeping in mind that it only takes ONE Unique View, to result in ONE Reply, here is what I've discovered, in the numbers available, from The Amateur Forum (Show Yourself Off).

The data taken was limited to those threads started on 7/15, or after. The sample was limited to 50 threads, starting with the earliest reply date within that data range, and continuing forward until the sample limit was reached.

Thus we have 50 threads, with 'last reply' dates ranging from 7/17 to 7/31. The total replies is 1,366 with 30,559 views. The range of replies per thread is 0 to 49, with the number of views per thread ranging from 218 to 1,565.

On the low side of replies, that of the two with 0 replies, one had 218 views, and the other had 320 views.

On the high side of views, the two most 'popular' had 1,565 views with 27 replies, and 1,262 views with 24 replies. That's a difference of 303 views with 3 replies, or 1.01 replies per 100 views.

The MEDIAN numbers stand at 673.5 views with 24.5 replies, which translates to a 3.62% rate of response.

The AVERAGE numbers stand at 611.82 views with 27.32 replies, which translates to a 4.47% rate of response.

It can be argued that the number of replies was driving the number of views since each reply 'bumps' the thread to the top of the latest posted list, which places it at the forefront of the current posting attention span.

Other factors include the appeal of the thread's title, the date/time stamp of the latest 'bump', which determines where it falls within the forum's general 'traffic flow', plus other factors that can effect your 'click through' rate. All of that goes to explain your generating 117 views, over that 10hr. span, rather than the 0 reply result.

However, if we're looking for the number of replies that might have been expected from your views, using the average numbers, over that 10hr. period (as opposed to a full 24hr., to encompass all the forum's time zones, or a 'full cycle'), your reply rate was at .5265 when you pulled the plug.

SO ... In the future ... May I suggest just a bit more Patience, Buddy?

All the more reasons to ... no matter what ...

Keep smilin'!!
Chaz

P.S.
I would NEVER think of trying to usurp your position as Bendy's Official Disciplinarian!

I was only thinking of helping out by warming him up a little for You!

 

[RonR18]

O.K.! While keeping in mind that it only takes ONE Unique View, to result in ONE Reply, here is what I've discovered, in the numbers available, from The Amateur Forum (Show Yourself Off).

The data taken was limited to those threads started on 7/15, or after. The sample was limited to 50 threads, starting with the earliest reply date within that data range, and continuing forward until the sample limit was reached.

Thus we have 50 threads, with 'last reply' dates ranging from 7/17 to 7/31. The total replies is 1,366 with 30,559 views. The range of replies per thread is 0 to 49, with the number of views per thread ranging from 218 to 1,565.

On the low side of replies, that of the two with 0 replies, one had 218 views, and the other had 320 views.

On the high side of views, the two most 'popular' had 1,565 views with 27 replies, and 1,262 views with 24 replies. That's a difference of 303 views with 3 replies, or 1.01 replies per 100 views.

The MEDIAN numbers stand at 673.5 views with 24.5 replies, which translates to a 3.62% rate of response.

The AVERAGE numbers stand at 611.82 views with 27.32 replies, which translates to a 4.47% rate of response.

It can be argued that the number of replies was driving the number of views since each reply 'bumps' the thread to the top of the latest posted list, which places it at the forefront of the current posting attention span.

Other factors include the appeal of the thread's title, the date/time stamp of the latest 'bump', which determines where it falls within the forum's general 'traffic flow', plus other factors that can effect your 'click through' rate. All of that goes to explain your generating 117 views, over that 10hr. span, rather than the 0 reply result.

However, if we're looking for the number of replies that might have been expected from your views, using the average numbers, over that 10hr. period (as opposed to a full 24hr., to encompass all the forum's time zones, or a 'full cycle'), your reply rate was at .5265 when you pulled the plug.

SO ... In the future ... May I suggest just a bit more Patience, Buddy?

All the more reasons to ... no matter what ...

Keep smilin'!!
Chaz

P.S.
I would NEVER think of trying to usurp your position as Bendy's Official Disciplinarian!

I was only thinking of helping out by warming him up a little for You!

Interesting set of data, thanks.

RE: "SO ... In the future ... May I suggest just a bit more Patience, Buddy?"

Sure, in a future life, I'll wait 12 hours before pulling the plug.

 

[RonR18]

I don't have to be an official expert to know that your over-the-top antics don't represent the community as a whole.

Huh? "Over-the-top antics?" I don't have a clue what you're referring to, so would you care to clarify what you mean in order to give your comment a shred of credibility? Unless that's just your new debate tactic, in which you smugly lean back in your chair sucking your thumb, saying, "Haha, I win, cause he obviously can't mount a defense when he doesn't know what the hell I'm talking about."

If so, that's the only way you can win a debate with me.

 

[pat grimshaw]

^
RonR18, you can't ague with NA. He's a self-proclaimed artist.

 

[Lefty]

Ronnie, you have a penis. So do most all or a least a lot of XY's.

Whoever was issuing them when you were conceived was kind and
generous and gave you a nice big one.

Some people think if they are Big Penis's no one will notice they are really
just little pricks regardless of the size of their genitalia.

XX's can also be pricks.

Enough said. I would prefer seeing into the real Ron than look at what he
was given at birth.

 

[Kyanimal]

Interesting set of data, thanks.

RE: "SO ... In the future ... May I suggest just a bit more Patience, Buddy?"

Sure, in a future life, I'll wait 12 hours before pulling the plug.

HA! Those extra two hours WILL get you closer to a reply, with an expectation of .6835.

What I'm trying to show you is that there is NO statistical Evidence of a "massive rejection". What you were experiencing was a subjective, not objective, feeling. And, I'm truly sorry that I, for one, was not around to help assuage that.

Butt, though it was subjective, it does not, in any way, dilute it's personal reality. And, I do understand that, perhaps all too well. Though I regret your decision, since I, and Many others, LOVED that thread, and still LOVE YOU!, and not only for your Awesome, Sexy, body, I can still empathize with 'where' you were 'at'.

NOW ... I'm thinking we should talk, a bit more, about Bendy's slim, young, smooth, Butt!

Keep smilin'!!
Chaz

(YES! To what Lefty just said! ^ )

 

[LaughOutLoud]

I don't know much about you, if anything at all, but I have to say - this thread just reeks of attention seeking.

I suppose it's worked though, just look at all the replies you've had to this thread

 

[ixthrock]

Sorry your parents were so psychotic and left you with such issues. Mine were awesome! My dad, especially, who taught me many wise things - one of them being that if you give something away, you do so solely for the pleasure derived in the giving. To expect something in return is odious because it cheapens the gift and it lessens the pleasure derived from giving. How much should one expect in return? At least a little something, a token, say? A jot? No. A tittle? Nothing.

From the tenor and content in this thread, I assume that you posted naked pictures of (I gather) yourself, not purely because you enjoy doing so, but because you were hoping for some response. I'm curious as to whether a response of "Ewww, that's hideous! Please stop!" would have been enough to keep you from deleting the thread, or if it's a particular kind of response you were hoping for.

Mind you, my participation here at JUB is notably sporadic, and I rarely stray from hot topics; I don't remember visiting the thread in question. Feel free to take what I say with a grain of salt.

My wish for you from this is that you become better able to examine your own motives, discover what it is you really need, and to develop less traumatic responses when your needs aren't being met.

 

[RonR18]

^
RonR18, you can't ague with NA. He's a self-proclaimed artist.

Well said, except I'd add the initials "B.S." in front of "artist."

Ronnie, you have a penis. So do most all or a least a lot of XY's.

Whoever was issuing them when you were conceived was kind and
generous and gave you a nice big one.

Some people think if they are Big Penis's no one will notice they are really
just little pricks regardless of the size of their genitalia.

XX's can also be pricks.

Enough said. I would prefer seeing into the real Ron than look at what he
was given at birth.

^ That... Butt, and this is a BIG butt, I'd prefer to see into the real Lefty, in ADDITION to the big hairy butt he has now.

HA! Those extra two hours WILL get you closer to a reply, with an expectation of .6835.

What I'm trying to show you is that there is NO statistical Evidence of a "massive rejection". What you were experiencing was a subjective, not objective, feeling. And, I'm truly sorry that I, for one, was not around to help assuage that.

Butt, though it was subjective, it does not, in any way, dilute it's personal reality. And, I do understand that, perhaps all too well. Though I regret your decision, since I, and Many others, LOVED that thread, and still LOVE YOU!, and not only for your Awesome, Sexy, body, I can still empathize with 'where' you were 'at'.

NOW ... I'm thinking we should talk, a bit more, about Bendy's slim, young, smooth, Butt!

Keep smilin'!!
Chaz

(YES! To what Lefty just said! ^ )

RE: "there is NO statistical Evidence of a "massive rejection"

Butt, and this is a BIG butt...people have a tendency to react based on their emotions rather than statistical evidence.


RE: "What you were experiencing was a subjective, not objective, feeling"

^ That too...

RE: "And, I'm truly sorry that I, for one, was not around to help assuage that."

Thanks for reminding me, because I haven't smacked your arse for that yet...

RE: "Though I regret your decision, since I, and Many others, LOVED that thread, and still LOVE YOU!, and not only for your Awesome, Sexy, body, I can still empathize with 'where' you were 'at'."

You're killing me with kindness, mate. And you're an excellent salesman, because I've decided to repost the pictures on a private Google blog and add new ones to them, just for you and the other guys who have supported me in this thread and indicated an interest in my pics. Because like I said, I'm an exhibitionist who likes to share, butt I'd much rather have an "audience" of a few guys who will provide feedback with each posting, vs hundreds who never say anything. Butt, don't expect it anytime soon, because it's going to take some time for my inspiration to becum fully inflated again. (I'll send you guys the link and password to one of your throw away email addresses whenever the site is set up.)

RE: "NOW ... I'm thinking we should talk, a bit more, about Bendy's slim, young, smooth, Butt!

Hmm, now that's one of my favorite topics.

I don't know much about you, if anything at all, but I have to say - this thread just reeks of attention seeking.

I suppose it's worked though, just look at all the replies you've had to this thread

RE: "I don't know much about you, if anything at all, but I have to say - this thread just reeks of attention seeking."

I don't know much about you, if anything at all, butt I have to say - your comment just reeks of trolling/baiting. I don't normally feed attention seeking trolls, butt I'll bite this time, in the event you're just suffering from abject cluelessness.

1) The first sentence of this thread states, "Someone asked me what happened to my thread within 15 minutes of it being deleted, and I knew there would be other people wondering as well, hence this explanation." Surely someone would bother to read at least the FIRST sentence of a thread before insulting the OP, regardless of how clueless they are? And if you did read it, even if you're the most clueless person in the world, what, exactly, would be difficult to comprehend about that verbiage? Based on this alone, can you see why I would suspect you of being just another attention seeking troll who gets off on baiting people?

2) Since your nonsensical, demeaning putdown could apply to anyone who posts a thread, you clearly have no concept of online forums. People post threads pertaining to topics of interest to them, and the people who are interested in those topics post their opinions in those threads...simple. If you do understand this concept, then what, exactly, is your problem, if you're not trolling? Are you just a hater who likes to fuck with people for sport? The reason I ask, is because I notice you posted a derogatory comment in the
"http://www.justusboys.com/forum/hot-topics/227341-michael-phelps-ugly-10.html#post8263974" thread a few days ago: "This thread fucking sucks."

3) My picture thread had 4 pages of comments, with 160+ people clicking on the thread every time any post was made to it. So is it your position that none of those people would be wondering why the thread had suddenly vanished into thin air? Or, are you suggesting that I should have just been an extremely selfish, uncaring, inconsiderate person, and simply not given a fuck about all those JUBbers? Is that what you would have done? If so, you should understand that just because people are fortunate enough not to share your personality traits, it doesn't mean they're seeking attention.

Sorry your parents were so psychotic and left you with such issues. Mine were awesome! My dad, especially, who taught me many wise things - one of them being that if you give something away, you do so solely for the pleasure derived in the giving. To expect something in return is odious because it cheapens the gift and it lessens the pleasure derived from giving. How much should one expect in return? At least a little something, a token, say? A jot? No. A tittle? Nothing.

From the tenor and content in this thread, I assume that you posted naked pictures of (I gather) yourself, not purely because you enjoy doing so, but because you were hoping for some response. I'm curious as to whether a response of "Ewww, that's hideous! Please stop!" would have been enough to keep you from deleting the thread, or if it's a particular kind of response you were hoping for.

Mind you, my participation here at JustUsBoys is notably sporadic, and I rarely stray from hot topics; I don't remember visiting the thread in question. Feel free to take what I say with a grain of salt.

My wish for you from this is that you become better able to examine your own motives, discover what it is you really need, and to develop less traumatic responses when your needs aren't being met.

RE: "Sorry your parents were so psychotic and left you with such issues."

Thank you.

RE: "Mine were awesome."

You're a very, very fortunate guy, because abusive, psychotic parents can cause a lifetime of psychological issues/problems for their victims.

RE: "To expect something in return is odious because it cheapens the gift and it lessens the pleasure derived from giving."

Butt in my case, it wasn't "expecting" something in return, it was simply an emotional reaction to the perception of rejection from getting zero feedback from 117 people over a 10 hour period. And you also have to consider that "something in return" implies something of similar value...for example, similar pics.

And from a technical standpoint, there's no real "value" per se from feedback. It's just acknowledgement that the recipients liked the pics enough to publicly say so, and provides confirmation the poster isn't making a fool out of himself by posting nude self-pics. Like I told Corny, "Many people will have their feelings hurt to a significant degree if there's no indication that people liked what they "showed off."

RE: "From the tenor and content in this thread, I assume that you posted naked pictures of (I gather) yourself, not purely because you enjoy doing so, but because you were hoping for some response."

Um, that would be a correct assumption. I'm an exhibitionist who likes to share nude pics of myself with people who have expressed interest in seeing them. Butt like I told Corny, there comes a point when public humiliation from the perception of mass rejection will override the desire to share for even the most prolific exhibitionist. I mean, can you imagine how embarrassed you'd feel if you stripped naked in a crowded restaurant and jumped around with your genitals flopping up and down, butt no one looked at you other than with their peripheral vision?

As well, no one who posts nude self-pics in the Amateur forum is doing it "purely because they enjoy doing so"...ALL of them are "hoping for some response." This is evidenced by the fact they don't continue posting the pics after viewers have lost interest in them and stopped providing feedback. The only difference between them and me is that I asked for my thread to be deleted, and I posted an explanation for the guys who would be wondering what happened to it.

 

[LaughOutLoud]

RE: "I don't know much about you, if anything at all, but I have to say - this thread just reeks of attention seeking."

I don't know much about you, if anything at all, butt I have to say - your comment just reeks of trolling/baiting. I don't normally feed attention seeking trolls, butt I'll bite this time, in the event you're just suffering from abject cluelessness.

1) The first sentence of this thread states, "Someone asked me what happened to my thread within 15 minutes of it being deleted, and I knew there would be other people wondering as well, hence this explanation." Surely someone would bother to read at least the FIRST sentence of a thread before insulting the OP, regardless of how clueless they are? And if you did read it, even if you're the most clueless person in the world, what, exactly, would be difficult to comprehend about that verbiage? Based on this alone, can you see why I would suspect you of being just another attention seeking troll who gets off on baiting people?

2) Since your nonsensical, demeaning putdown could apply to anyone who posts a thread, you clearly have no concept of online forums. People post threads pertaining to topics of interest to them, and the people who are interested in those topics post their opinions in those threads...simple. If you do understand this concept, then what, exactly, is your problem, if you're not trolling? Are you just a hater who likes to fuck with people for sport? The reason I ask, is because I notice you posted a derogatory comment in the "http://www.justusboys.com/forum/hot-topics/227341-michael-phelps-ugly-10.html#post8263974" thread a few days ago: "This thread fucking sucks."

3) My picture thread had 4 pages of comments, with 160+ people clicking on the thread every time any post was made to it. So is it your position that none of those people would be wondering why the thread had suddenly vanished into thin air? Or, are you suggesting that I should have just been an extremely selfish, uncaring, inconsiderate person, and simply not given a fuck about all those JUBbers? Is that what you would have done? If so, you should understand that just because people are fortunate enough not to share your personality traits, it doesn't mean they're seeking attention.

Jesus, are you serious with this bullshit?

Y'know, I wasn't going to bother replying, because it would be feeding you the attention you crave, but seeing as it's not the "OMGAWD YOUR PICS ARE SO HAWT" attention that you seem to be after, I'll play along.

1) I did read the entire thread, and there is nothing wrong with my reading comprehension. You can give it all the bullshit reasoning you want, you did it because you hadn't received quite the number of Private Messages asking about it's disappearance as you would have liked, so you had to bring it to the attention of more people.
My opinion. Don't like it? I don't give a shit.

2) I've uses online forums on and off for the last 8 years or so. I know how they work. I'm also used to being called a "Troll" when my post count is still so low and I haven't yet clicked with the in-crowd. I have no issue with that, refer to me as a Troll all you like, but the truth of the matter is that I'm just someone with an opinion. An opinion you don't like. Not my problem.

3) I don't hate on people for the fun of it. I give my honest opinion. Again, if you don't like that, that's your problem, not mine.

4) Yes, I did post that in the Michael Phelps thread. ONCE AGAIN, because it's my opinion. An entire thread dedicated to flaming someone. If that doesn't suck as a thread, I don't know what does.

5) You posted your nude pics in a forum sub-section that is a "no-flame zone". Did it ever occur to you that maybe those that looked at your photos just weren't as blown away by them as you were? Yeah, they came back - but morbid curiosity would also have that effect, not just lust. Just some food for thought.

6)Finally, you end your post by stating how many pages of comments your thread had. having just had a quick look at that forum sub-section and seen how few comments the majority of threads get, WHAT MORE DID YOU FUCKING WANT!? If you wanted every person that viewed your thread to gush and fawn over every picture you posted then you have reached new levels of delusion.


I'll now just sit back and wait for you to call me a Troll again because I don't agree with you

 

[Lefty]

Dear Mr. Laugh Out Loud,

First, I will not deny or hide that Ronnie is a friend of mine.

Second, neither he nor I knows much about You, the Person,
so we are guilty of judging you by your actions as well.

Third, at this time I do not believe you are a troll.

My suggestion to you (based on your posts) is that you stick to the main topic or issues. Some of us
on here harass the hell out of each other and make somewhat 'flamey' remarks as a part of our
relationships. Sometimes we are just assholes and on occasion a troll will even break in.

I don't claim to be omnipotent, wise or all seeing. I did feel that a number of your posts were a bit
more aggressive evaluating people you don't know. (if you are an old jubber under new pretense
you already know what I mean) Lets keep the opinions on the issues, not the members for a bit.

We welcome you to JustUsBoys. Looking forward to your posts, opinions, suggestions and observations.

 

[RonR18]

Dear Mr. Laugh Out Loud,

First, I will not deny or hide that Ronnie is a friend of mine.

Second, neither he nor I knows much about You, the Person,
so we are guilty of judging you by your actions as well.

Third, at this time I do not believe you are a troll.

My suggestion to you (based on your posts) is that you stick to the main topic or issues. Some of us
on here harass the hell out of each other and make somewhat 'flamey' remarks as a part of our
relationships. Sometimes we are just assholes and on occasion a troll will even break in.

I don't claim to be omnipotent, wise or all seeing. I did feel that a number of your posts were a bit
more aggressive evaluating people you don't know. (if you are an old jubber under new pretense
you already know what I mean) Lets keep the opinions on the issues, not the members for a bit.

We welcome you to JustUsBoys. Looking forward to your posts, opinions, suggestions and observations.

He's definitely a troll, Lefty, and now I know exactly who he is. He harassed me multiple times over a year ago using a name that, I believe, starts with a T. His first bait post back then was in my now defunct burglar story...I believe on the last page. I'll be looking up his info when I get a chance, to send to a mod.

 

[ixthrock]

Thank you. You're a very, very fortunate guy, because abusive, psychotic parents can cause a lifetime of psychological issues/problems for their victims.

Yeah, well... they were nuts enough to leave me with SOME issues - especially my mom. But no-one here gets out alive, and we're all bozos on this bus, and you only have one mother... Ok, enough with the platitudes.

Butt in my case,... it was ... an emotional reaction to the perception of rejection....

It's good to see you recognising this...

And you also have to consider that "something in return" implies something of similar value...for example, similar pics.

So I guess it's "put up or shut up time for me, eh? Not to worry, I got no issues with strutting my scary junk. I've been meaning to contribute to the "current pictures" thread for a while now anyway, but I'm busy and disorganised, so please be patient.

And from a technical standpoint, there's no real "value" per se from feedback.

hmmmm...
I'd consider a different technique, then. Isn't the point of this thread exactly the opposite? If I give you positive feedback on your pictures, do you really wish me to believe there's "technically" no value in it?

...provides confirmation the poster isn't making a fool out of himself by posting nude self-pics.

Perhaps there's a difference between you and I - I have no problem making a fool out of myself. Especially not by posting nekkie pics here.

can you imagine how embarrassed you'd feel if you stripped naked in a crowded restaurant and jumped around with your genitals flopping up and down, butt no one looked at you other than with their peripheral vision?

That WAS the hardest part of being a go-go boy, for me, but - hey, it's a living.

As well, no one who posts nude self-pics in the Amateur forum is doing it "purely because they enjoy doing so"...

I guess I'll be the 1st, then.

 

[LaughOutLoud]

Thank you, Lefty, for your kind words.

Ron, good luck with that - I can ASSURE you I've never had an account on this site other than this one.

Thanks for proving my point that you'd continue to call me a troll just because I don't agree with you though

 

[Telstra]

You should just leave the thread alone and the comments will cum ...