biguy732
The Sperminator
because they were cool when I was about 12 - not in my 30's
The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums
-
Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community
In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
If you do not have an account, please register.
REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your InfoPLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
Why is nobody talking about the new TRANSFORMERS Movie?!
- Thread starter biguy732
- Start date
The 1st one bored me to tears. Talking trucks and cars? I will pass on the new one.
Harke the Boeotarch
Dreams Wash Away
It was an allout coolfest!. And there was lot's of ribaldry going on.
Those primes sounded like Obama. The machine was inside the Great Pyramid. Megatron Cthulu anyone? Was that Jewish 1/32 part Arab wearing a jock? Those black robots sucked, though, and the Arcees were underexposed.
In the first 20 reviews at RottenTomatoes.com, only 1 review had a red tomato. The rest were 'rotten'. Even then, the 'red' review didn't sound entirely sure of his opinion:
Beachguyj
Is the King of JUB
Ebert Quote:
"Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" is a horrible experience of unbearable length, briefly punctuated by three or four amusing moments. One of these involves a dog-like robot humping the leg of the heroine. Such are the meager joys. If you want to save yourself the ticket price, go into the kitchen, cue up a male choir singing the music of hell, and get a kid to start banging pots and pans together. Then close your eyes and use your imagination.
"Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" is a horrible experience of unbearable length, briefly punctuated by three or four amusing moments. One of these involves a dog-like robot humping the leg of the heroine. Such are the meager joys. If you want to save yourself the ticket price, go into the kitchen, cue up a male choir singing the music of hell, and get a kid to start banging pots and pans together. Then close your eyes and use your imagination.
I'm the opposite. The reviews that say it's bad make me wonder why I would spend my time and money on going to see it.
For that very reason, I shall never watch Pink Panther 2 (13%) or Land of the Lost (28%).
The Yattering
On the Prowl
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2009
- Posts
- 53
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 6
It's certainly a movie that requires a particular mindset in order to appreciate; one must acknowledge that:
A: This is the epitome of Michael Bay film making, i.e. about as deep as a contact lense, big on explosions, low on plot. Stunning visuals, mind melting action sequences; character development hovering between that of the original 1980's cartoon and a pot of yoghurt from the same era.
B: It's a movie that is deeply, deeply aware of the fundamental absurdity of its subject matter and makes no bones about it. In point of fact, it emphasises the quality and somehow makes a virtue of it. This is the cinematic equivalent of an A.D.H.D suffering, educationally sub-normal eight year old after too many red skittles and bottles of coke who can nevertheless be incredibly charming when he wants to be.
If you can handle all of that, it's actually a brilliantly fun waste of time. Just don't go in expecting Citizen Kane.
A: This is the epitome of Michael Bay film making, i.e. about as deep as a contact lense, big on explosions, low on plot. Stunning visuals, mind melting action sequences; character development hovering between that of the original 1980's cartoon and a pot of yoghurt from the same era.
B: It's a movie that is deeply, deeply aware of the fundamental absurdity of its subject matter and makes no bones about it. In point of fact, it emphasises the quality and somehow makes a virtue of it. This is the cinematic equivalent of an A.D.H.D suffering, educationally sub-normal eight year old after too many red skittles and bottles of coke who can nevertheless be incredibly charming when he wants to be.
If you can handle all of that, it's actually a brilliantly fun waste of time. Just don't go in expecting Citizen Kane.
The funniest thing about that movie is that Megan Fox reportedly declined the offer to star as Wonder Woman because she considers that sort of projects "too lame" 
Megan is the same fuckhead Angelina used to be at her age (I don't mean she is not mnow, she just got older and tamer): it this case she really looks like she IS the next Angelina.
-3
Megan is the same fuckhead Angelina used to be at her age (I don't mean she is not mnow, she just got older and tamer): it this case she really looks like she IS the next Angelina.
-3
J-23
Want a slice? :)
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2006
- Posts
- 1,458
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Precisely. The direction was horrific, which was no surprise with a walking punchline like Bay at the helm. With all of the quick cuts and close-up shots during the action sequences, it was impossible to discern one "character" from the next -- they all looked like tangled masses of steel.
Plus, you know, LaBeouf, d-bag, blah.
Totally the most boring action film I've ever seen.
I think the problem is calling it movie, but I admit that if we were that hard on all products marketed as movies, hardly half a dozen would qualify as such every year.
I suppose that you realize you need to be "sub-normal" yourself, to a certain degree, to find him "incredibly charming"
BTW, next one is in production for 2012
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000881/
there is a blogger i follow who saw an advanced screening and he hated it. i saw the first one and found it to be rather blah. michael bay, imho is a hack director. i may wait until it comes out on dvd.
Saw this on Sunday in the UK and I have to say that it wasn't as great as I had hoped it would be. I'm a big fan of the first movie so I was pumped to see this. Even though the action and CGI is superb, the storyline and characters needed to be fleshed out more. I felt as if they tried to cram everything in it. Even though there are more robots this time around, new autobots Sideswipe, Arcee and Jolt along with Ironhide and Ratchet are sidelined while new decepticons are basically cannon fodder. Makes you wonder why they're in the movie in the first place. I found too much screentime was devoted to Skids and Mudflap while we learned nothing of the other new autobots. They would've worked better in smaller doses. The film goes at such a frenetic pace that the 2 and a half hours flew by for me and my hubby. Overall, I'd give it a 7/10. It's got great action sequences but I think a lot of people are going to come out of it feeling like they did when they saw Spiderman 3; good summer sequel but not as awesome as you hope/expected it to be.
wastingmymind
JUB Addict
The funniest thing about that movie is that Megan Fox reportedly declined the offer to star as Wonder Woman because she considers that sort of projects "too lame"
Megan is the same fuckhead Angelina used to be at her age (I don't mean she is not mnow, she just got older and tamer): it this case she really looks like she IS the next Angelina.
-3
No, as you implicitly pointed out, Megan Fox is more of a sell out than Aneglina. At least Angelina in her early days just had Tomb raider to regret. Two of them. Megan has more crappy movies on her belt.
And yeah, if i didn't follow the blogs, I wouldn't even know this was coming out on a fucking Wednesday. And if Terminator Salvation was flat even at the times when the movie has stuff blowing up, it's probably gonna be the same with this one.
G-Lexington
Lex. Icon. Devil.
Random quotes from reviews.
* It’s like watching a blender for two hours while someone shouts at you. And then the last half an hour is the same, except it’s more like having your head strapped to a washing machine while you watch a blender and someone shouts at you.
* A cinematic avalanche in which Michael Bay eschews anything resembling plot or characters and instead screams at the audience's eyes for two and a half hours.
* Bad storytelling is bad storytelling, no matter how many explosions, robots and hot chicks you have on screen.
* A joyless, humorless, bloated carcass of an event movie...Nothing kills the euphoric buzz of exceptionally articulated carefree mindlessness quite like a newly emboldened Michael Bay
* Even if it were a more tolerable 90 minutes, it would still sum up everything that is most tedious, crass and despicable about modern Hollywood.
Everybody I know hated the first movie...and every single one of them is lining up to see this one. I predict $120 million opening weekend.
Lex
* It’s like watching a blender for two hours while someone shouts at you. And then the last half an hour is the same, except it’s more like having your head strapped to a washing machine while you watch a blender and someone shouts at you.
* A cinematic avalanche in which Michael Bay eschews anything resembling plot or characters and instead screams at the audience's eyes for two and a half hours.
* Bad storytelling is bad storytelling, no matter how many explosions, robots and hot chicks you have on screen.
* A joyless, humorless, bloated carcass of an event movie...Nothing kills the euphoric buzz of exceptionally articulated carefree mindlessness quite like a newly emboldened Michael Bay
* Even if it were a more tolerable 90 minutes, it would still sum up everything that is most tedious, crass and despicable about modern Hollywood.
Everybody I know hated the first movie...and every single one of them is lining up to see this one. I predict $120 million opening weekend.
Lex
fabulouslyghetto
Kween of Hot Topics
If I wanna see things explode and half=naked tramps (I hear the movie has more of the latter than the former) I can just turn on my cable.
MisterMajestic
It ain't easy being King
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2009
- Posts
- 10,437
- Reaction score
- 297
- Points
- 0
Transformers 2 is good...It's better than the First film because you get to see more "Bots" and action-packed Fighting scenes..
The writers/Director(s) decided to throw in a boat-load of Comedy..There were a ton of little kids in the theatre and the Language used in the Film was a little Rough for the Parents and their kids...
I think the Director has a crush on the film's co-star John Turturro. I say that because John had to strip down to his Boxers in the First film and in this film we see John's Beefy-Ass in a Jock-strap..John's 50-something Buns looked good as he walked up the ladder as well...
You'll see what I'm talking about when you see the film...
The writers/Director(s) decided to throw in a boat-load of Comedy..There were a ton of little kids in the theatre and the Language used in the Film was a little Rough for the Parents and their kids...
I think the Director has a crush on the film's co-star John Turturro. I say that because John had to strip down to his Boxers in the First film and in this film we see John's Beefy-Ass in a Jock-strap..John's 50-something Buns looked good as he walked up the ladder as well...
You'll see what I'm talking about when you see the film...