Nooooooo! Robert isn't ugly, but he ain't no Finnick either! Plus, isn't Finnick supposed to be athletic/muscular?! What part of Robert is muscular or athletic?
The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums
-
Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community
In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
If you do not have an account, please register.
REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your InfoPLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
Why the hell do people like the Hunger Games movie?
- Thread starter G-Lexington
- Start date
Nooooooo! Robert isn't ugly, but he ain't no Finnick either! Plus, isn't Finnick supposed to be athletic/muscular?! What part of Robert is muscular or athletic?
He's in talks, along with Robert Pattinson, Zac Effron, Channing Tatum, Alex Petyfer, Chace Crawford. Personally, even though they're just 31, based on previous roles, in my opinion Channing and Ryan are a little mature to play a 24-year-old playboy. I get Zac because he fits the physique and face description, but not height. But then again, Josh Hutcherson is 5'5" and plays a 5'10 character. Chace Crawford would be good too. But not Robert, please.
MisterMajestic
It ain't easy being King
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2009
- Posts
- 10,437
- Reaction score
- 297
- Points
- 0
I didnt know a thing about the books but I planned to see the Flick regardless of the reviews and the Hype...I realized how much Lenny Kravitz is a Beautiful man and Woody Harrelson still got-it-going-on....2 Sexy middle-aged Fuckers...
Other than that the movie was decent...
Other than that the movie was decent...
subsonic
Sex God
Uh, I really want to see the movie! But I probably wont catch it before it's out on dvd.
I actually bought the boxset from amazon when it was on sale once. I've only gotten to read the first book and I was actually a bit disappointed in it. I mean, yeah, it is interesting and fast-paced, but I didn't like the protagonist one bit - she seemed so blind that she just annoyed me for the most part. I'll have to see if I'll think better of the next to when I get around to reading them. But so far, I don't see what the fuss is about. Uh, and I hated how the book was plastered with quotes from various high-profile writers and reviewers, praising the book, forcing their opinion down my throat :-(
I actually bought the boxset from amazon when it was on sale once. I've only gotten to read the first book and I was actually a bit disappointed in it. I mean, yeah, it is interesting and fast-paced, but I didn't like the protagonist one bit - she seemed so blind that she just annoyed me for the most part. I'll have to see if I'll think better of the next to when I get around to reading them. But so far, I don't see what the fuss is about. Uh, and I hated how the book was plastered with quotes from various high-profile writers and reviewers, praising the book, forcing their opinion down my throat :-(
Musik2400
Sex God
- Joined
- May 26, 2009
- Posts
- 892
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 18
He's in talks, along with Robert Pattinson, Zac Effron, Channing Tatum, Alex Petyfer, Chace Crawford. Personally, even though they're just 31, based on previous roles, in my opinion Channing and Ryan are a little mature to play a 24-year-old playboy. I get Zac because he fits the physique and face description, but not height. But then again, Josh Hutcherson is 5'5" and plays a 5'10 character. Chace Crawford would be good too. But not Robert, please.
Out of this list, I'd like to Alex Petyfer get it the most, cuz he's actually pretty close to how I pictured Finnick.
Ephemeral
Sex God
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2010
- Posts
- 937
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 0
As a HUGE fan of the book series (I'm talking about reading and writing fanfiction based off the stuff and knowing just about everything about it), I would say that the movie was a nice try.
The first time I went to see it, I was left underwhelmed. The second time I enjoyed myself far more. I learned to relax and enjoy the movie as a movie, not as the film adaption to my all-time favorite series.
Still, I was left wanting more. Many things weren't explained enough or explained too much (the reason for the Games were explained three times! At the very beginning, at the Reaping, Snow's speech). Did they even say who Haymitch was besides a bumbling drunk? Worse, they only implied that Katniss's affection was for the cameras when in the book she clearly tells Peeta the full truth. I readily appreciate that the film was made for the fans but I feel like if I wasn't one, I would be left confused and uninterested. Besides that, I feel that in some scenes the acting could've been better (Gale and Katniss's first interaction, Prim and Mrs. Everdeen altogether) and the 'shaky camera' effect got old fast.
To me, the film was more of a two-and-a-half hour long advertisement than a stand-alone movie. A teaser, encouraging viewers to read the books so they can better understand what the hell happened. Far from the worst movie, but far from the best movie like they were hyping it up to be. I just hope they do better with Catching Fire.
The first time I went to see it, I was left underwhelmed. The second time I enjoyed myself far more. I learned to relax and enjoy the movie as a movie, not as the film adaption to my all-time favorite series.
Still, I was left wanting more. Many things weren't explained enough or explained too much (the reason for the Games were explained three times! At the very beginning, at the Reaping, Snow's speech). Did they even say who Haymitch was besides a bumbling drunk? Worse, they only implied that Katniss's affection was for the cameras when in the book she clearly tells Peeta the full truth. I readily appreciate that the film was made for the fans but I feel like if I wasn't one, I would be left confused and uninterested. Besides that, I feel that in some scenes the acting could've been better (Gale and Katniss's first interaction, Prim and Mrs. Everdeen altogether) and the 'shaky camera' effect got old fast.
To me, the film was more of a two-and-a-half hour long advertisement than a stand-alone movie. A teaser, encouraging viewers to read the books so they can better understand what the hell happened. Far from the worst movie, but far from the best movie like they were hyping it up to be. I just hope they do better with Catching Fire.