- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Posts
- 123,002
- Reaction score
- 4,586
- Points
- 113
Rather than addressing the validity for her claim of gender-based pay inequality, the outcome of the Ledbetter court case focused upon the timing of her complaints. It is my impression that opposition to the Ledbetter law was based largely upon the likelihood that it would generate “frivolous lawsuits” initiated by retiring employees for alleged actions that had occurred during years previous. The “Ledbetter Act” establishes a basis to sue in such cases~ that might otherwise be dismissed as a consequence of the Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc.
Yes. The law as it stood required women to notice on their very first paycheck on a new job that they weren't being paid equally to the men doing the same job, and then file, or just keep working for less pay and shut up. There's nothing nice to say about such a position; it amounts to enforced involuntary servitude, since the difference in pay between the women and men is free labor to the employer, and thus slavery.
Republicans especially were worried that women might decide years later that they wanted to sue after all, but that was considered inconsequential in face of the fact that women who had worked for months and then just discovered they were being treated unequally were forbidden to seek justice.
This, BTW, is a nice divider between actual libertarians and propertarians: libertarians would support the women being able to bring suit whenever they happened to discover the disparity, plus whatever time it took them to get counsel and prepare; propertarians hold that the corporation "owns" the jobs, i.e. that they're property, so either the woman protests immediately or not at all. The divide has been plain off and on in the various libertarian magazines when this or similar issues come along.
Chris Hayes brought this up on his show this AM. Seems, I think they said, just last January Romney was all for women on welfare to got to work! Now because of Hillary Rosen all women who stay at home are working mothers.
Make up your mind Mitt!
He was very plain. Put the two statements together, and the syllogism is easy:
Ann Romney has no dignity.


























