It's released in UK this coming Friday!
I'll DEFO be going to see it wiv the bf! Looking forward to it!
I'll DEFO be going to see it wiv the bf! Looking forward to it!
The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums
-
Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community
In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
If you do not have an account, please register.
REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your InfoPLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.
WOW - 10,000 BC - March.7.2008
- Thread starter Danugh
- Start date
I went to the theater today to see this movie. I liked it, granted it's not going to win any academy awards (except maybe for sound) in my opinion.
One great quote in the movie was: "If I free you, don't eat me" <---- or something very similar to that.
I thought the sound effects were excellent.
I think you should check it out.
One great quote in the movie was: "If I free you, don't eat me" <---- or something very similar to that.
I thought the sound effects were excellent.
I think you should check it out.
savagegimp
Slut
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2006
- Posts
- 154
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
I thought the movie was ok. It actually felt like it was an hour longer than what it was to me, it just kinda dragged on.
The story was ok, the cast was ok, the effects were ok. Pretty much sums it up.
On a scale of 1/10, I'll give it a 6.
The story was ok, the cast was ok, the effects were ok. Pretty much sums it up.
On a scale of 1/10, I'll give it a 6.
Spellbound
JUB Addict
I saw it last night. I did not enjoy it. I thought the script, acting and special effects were average. 
The lead actor was a hottie however. He is almost as good as Barry Pepper. (look him up ) I kept on thinking about Barry Pepper when watching this film. (and no I do not like Barry Pepper). It is a joke with a few friends.
Barry Pepper is the top of the bad actor list. The actor to which all others are compared to.
If you want to see 10,000 BC go see it. Just don't expect the best film ever made.
The lead actor was a hottie however. He is almost as good as Barry Pepper. (look him up ) I kept on thinking about Barry Pepper when watching this film. (and no I do not like Barry Pepper). It is a joke with a few friends.
Barry Pepper is the top of the bad actor list. The actor to which all others are compared to.
If you want to see 10,000 BC go see it. Just don't expect the best film ever made.
Kurn
JUB Addict
Historical note: a lot of reviewers tried to skewer this aspect. The thing is, the historian's picture of what 10,000 BC was like is very incomplete.
What you see is neither historical nor anti-historical, but simply a somewhat plausible pre-historical fantasy.
It doesn't merit negative criticism on that basis; it's just that we don't know--with %100 certainty.
Current thinking, based on a variety of evidence, concerning these Times does, to be sure, suggest that things like horses weren't used by humans until about 5,000 years later. But we are not absolutely sure %100 of that. And so on. Don't take what's in the movie too seriously either way.
What you see is neither historical nor anti-historical, but simply a somewhat plausible pre-historical fantasy.
It doesn't merit negative criticism on that basis; it's just that we don't know--with %100 certainty.
Current thinking, based on a variety of evidence, concerning these Times does, to be sure, suggest that things like horses weren't used by humans until about 5,000 years later. But we are not absolutely sure %100 of that. And so on. Don't take what's in the movie too seriously either way.
RobinGoodfellow
JUB Addict
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2005
- Posts
- 2,439
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 0
- Location
- Sacramento
- Website
- twosparrows.5gigs.com
First person I've seen that actually thinks that cavemen, pyramids, and dinosaurs all existed at the same time....
RG
RG
Kurn
JUB Addict
Umm, well, the distinction between fantasy and archaeologically-based conjecture is a bit muddled for some people.
The landscape presented suggests an extrapolation on Sahara-Atlantis thinking: the idea that much of Neolithic and even Bronze Age technology/civilization may have started long ago in a much greener and more hospitable Sahara.
Dinosaurs? Could a few have survived in the middle of that vast acreage? This suggestion is enough for a motion picture fantasy.
10,000 BC. Were there "cavemen" still, so late? Neanderthals? There are suggestions in Greek mythology that might be evidence of a profound socio-cultural revolution, featuring a separating-out of a special type of humankind.
No, there is no evidence that supports a serious discussion of these fantastic inventions. And yet, you cannot deny that mythology gets very serious discussions in many places.
The landscape presented suggests an extrapolation on Sahara-Atlantis thinking: the idea that much of Neolithic and even Bronze Age technology/civilization may have started long ago in a much greener and more hospitable Sahara.
Dinosaurs? Could a few have survived in the middle of that vast acreage? This suggestion is enough for a motion picture fantasy.
10,000 BC. Were there "cavemen" still, so late? Neanderthals? There are suggestions in Greek mythology that might be evidence of a profound socio-cultural revolution, featuring a separating-out of a special type of humankind.
No, there is no evidence that supports a serious discussion of these fantastic inventions. And yet, you cannot deny that mythology gets very serious discussions in many places.
Kurn
JUB Addict
I SAW the WHOLE movie!!!!
There aren't any dinosaurs in it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gastornis
The above link will explain what was in the movie. You might want to wait until after you've seen it. Or not.
There aren't any "cavemen" or Neanderthals. They're all basically Homo sapiens.
Alas, there are no homoerotic orgy scenes.
The lead actor is quite cute. Reminds you a lot of Colin Farrell.
None of the elements of the story are preposterous, given a moderate amount of movie-making license.
But even the geographical sequence is plausible.
At the same time, none of it should be taken as other than speculative.
That said, there is a good amount of intellectual conjecture in the movie about "what was" to make it interesting and to take it beyond caveman melodrama.
If part of it looks like "ancient Egypt" keep in mind that they are intending "VERY ancient Egypt," sort of a back-story to the Ancient Egypt that is familiar to us.
There aren't any dinosaurs in it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gastornis
The above link will explain what was in the movie. You might want to wait until after you've seen it. Or not.
There aren't any "cavemen" or Neanderthals. They're all basically Homo sapiens.
Alas, there are no homoerotic orgy scenes.
The lead actor is quite cute. Reminds you a lot of Colin Farrell.
None of the elements of the story are preposterous, given a moderate amount of movie-making license.
But even the geographical sequence is plausible.
At the same time, none of it should be taken as other than speculative.
That said, there is a good amount of intellectual conjecture in the movie about "what was" to make it interesting and to take it beyond caveman melodrama.
If part of it looks like "ancient Egypt" keep in mind that they are intending "VERY ancient Egypt," sort of a back-story to the Ancient Egypt that is familiar to us.