Re: 15 States to Watch in the US Presidential Elec
More new polls...one is perplexing.
OHIO -- McCain +10 -- Rasmussen -- This contest had McCain at +6 without leaners. Yesterday's PPP poll had Obama at +8 so a big swing between the two polls. One difference is that PPP does not name 3rd party candidates. Rasmussen gives you a 3rd party option, but then tries to get the voter to name who would they support if not for the 3rd party candidate. Many Barr supporters then lean toward McCain. I read it, but I can't say that I understand it as I would think this would make McCain do more poorly in the Ras poll versus better. Also, in Ohio, there were some odd patterns of voting in the Ras poll --- with 18-29 year olds, McCain won 50-39% and with 30-39 year olds, McCain won 67-33. Obama easily won the fortysomethings and McCain won the senior vote by single digits. Again , the theory is that the younger votes gets skewed because they have cell phones instead of land phones. So, the youth sampling is smaller and may get skewed if you happen to call a slightly higher number of McCain voters.
This latest with Ohio I do not buy. In fact, Rasmussen Reports is the only polling source that has had
John McCain always leading
Barack Obama. So you bet I question this. Consider all of the following.…
From Wikipedia.org (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statew...the_United_States_presidential_election,_2008)…
Ohio, in July…
July 22 Rasmussen: John McCain ahead of Barack Obama, 46 to 40 percent ("leaners," 52 to 42 percent).
July 17-20 Public Policy Polling: Obama ahead of McCain, 48 to 40.
Ohio, in June…
June 17 Rasmussen: McCain ahead of Obama, 44 to 43 percent.
June 11-30 Zogby: Obama ahead of McCain, 43 to 38.
June 20-22 Survey USA: Obama ahead of McCain, 48 to 46.
June 9-16 Quinnipac University: Obama ahead of McCain, 48 to 42.
June 14-15 Public Policy Polling: Obama ahead of McCain, 50 to 39.
Pre-nominations, in Ohio
May 15 Rasmussen: McCain ahead of Obama, 45 to 44 percent.
April 8 Rasmussen: McCain ahead of Obama, 47 to 40 percent.
March 13 Rasmussen: McCain ahead of Obama, 46 to 40 percent.
February 17 Rasmussen: McCain ahead of Obama, 42 to 41 percent.
Interesting take on Rasmussen's Ohio polling from FiveThirtyEight.com (
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/)…
Dueling Ohio Polls
Rasmussen has a new poll out in Ohio where they show John McCain with what they headline as a "modest lead". Actually, McCain's lead is 6 points, and 10 including leaners, which I would probably describe as a little bit more than modest. This comes on the heels of a [Public Policy Polling] released just yesterday that had shown Obama with a not-so-modest lead of 8 points.
So, what the hell is going on here? Is this the party identification issue again — PPP tending to identify more Democrats in its sample than Rasmussen? Only up to a point. Neither pollster lists their party ID figures explicitly, but from what best I can tell, Rasmussen has the numbers at about 36/43/21 (Republican/Democrat/Independent) and PPP at 32/44/24. The party ID advantage accounts for about 4 points' worth of difference. For instance, if you took PPP's internals and weighted them as Rasmussen does by Rasmussen's party ID numbers, Obama would hold a 4-point lead rather than 8. That's still pretty significantly different from McCain leading by 10 points.
What else accounts for the differences between the two polls? Rasmussen initially permits one to select a third-party candidate — and 7 percent of voters do — whereas PPP does not. But then they push voters who have picked a third-party candidate toward one of the major-party candidate with a standard "who are you leaning toward?" question — and most of those leaners wind up with McCain. So it's possible that you have a number of fairly conservative voters who are dissatisfied with John McCain and are flirting with the idea of voting for Bob Barr — but will gravitate back toward McCain in the end.
The polls were also conducted at different times; all of Rasmussen's interviews were conducted Monday whereas PPP's were conducted Thursday through Sunday. The conventional wisdom has been — and frankly, my assumption has been — that Obama would get a little bit of a bounce out of his Iraq trip. This would directly contradict that, although I think we'll need to see quite a bit more evidence before we can reach a firm conclusion.