- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Posts
- 123,005
- Reaction score
- 4,595
- Points
- 113
What I'm curious to know (and I genuinely have no idea) is if you are CAPABLE within yourself to answer it.
It could have been answered twice now at the beginning of either of your last two posts, IMMEDIATELY followed by your explanations why it's not applicable. You're WAY intelligent enough to provide an adequate rebuttal and disclaimer to it, AND provide answers to any misleading follow-ups. But the glaring point is you HAVEN'T.
Why would someone like you who is perfectly capable of explaining yourself articulately find it SO challenging/threatening to answer a simple hypothetical question? So am I wrong? I can't understand why it couldn't have been answered WITH your previous posts.
Do you see the point I'm making? Would we theoretically go round and round and round in circles ad infinitum to 1,000 pages long and 50,000 posts (they'd move it to the Fun & Games thread) where the title would be: "Get Kulindahr to answer the question" and it becomes a ridiculous charade.
Yes, I see what you're talking about. You're trying to get me to establish that I can be led off-topic by any old hypothetical question someone throws out.
But if you want an answer, it's this: the question is wrong. People can't be absolved of other people's sins, only of their own. But they do have to deal with the consequences of all sorts of other people's actions -- which the scenario fails to address at all.





