The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    To register, turn off your VPN; you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

Britney Spears [Mega-Merged] Thread

Whats The Best Britney Spears Album?

  • ...baby one more time (1999)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • B In The Mix : The Remixes (2005)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    32
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

It was bound to happen since Friedman said himself that his goal was to get Britney to dance hard again. And I think that Britney was dancing better during Circus than she is now. At least it didn't look like she half assed the choreography at times and she was having fun. I still think they should kill the high heels.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYJGfFuqnwQ&feature=player_embedded

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ymybAsnJwWc&feature=player_embedded

Those vids are towards the end of the tour. At the beginning she looked worse than she did for the current promo performances. There was almost no energy anywhere and eventually she began to let lose and by the end this is what it was.
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

Comparison of beginning of circus tour to the end

beginning [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UeHsXDVQfRw[/ame]

end [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ty30ajumxog[/ame]

Plus her circus promo performances were pretty stiff too.

I think she was completely under rehearsed for Femme Fatale's promo performances and it showed. It's clear she doesn't put as much into rehearsing and getting it together as she once did but this is from the last HIAM performance and the end choreography is very tight. She does mess up but covers it well.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpyqqymLkng[/ame]

Overall she appears happier in the Femme Fatale performances, in my opinion. I'm excited for the tour...I hope she rehearses and I hope she tries to prove people wrong. I'm not giving up complete hope on Dance Britney until then. If she doesn't deliver for the tour I'll know that dance Britney is gone...I'll still love her but I won't keep holding onto it. The only thing helping me hold on at this point is seeing her improvement from the beginning of the circus tour to the end.
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

WTF did they do to Britney's chorus in S&M?
More like what they didn't do.


The reason she sounds weak (At least to me) is they did not harmonize or put any fucking backing vocals on it


It sounds like Rihanna, when she sings the chorus, has 5 layers.

Whoever produced it didn't give Britney any, or at the very most two. I really am bothered that they did that. I mean now I like it but when I first heard it it was bizarre and I couldn't put my finger on it.

Her verse made me stand @ attention though


I LOVE aggressive Britney but I wish she collaborated on "Only Girl in the world" Something about Britney telling a guy she wants to feel like the only girl in the world works for me.
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

I'm really loving Big Fat Bass and as far as the S&M remix goes its ok.
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

i think the only good (decent, more like it) song on the album is i wanna go. it has an all right beat and probably will be a single. it's just the autotune shit. ugg. why must britney be like every other singer? she sounds stupid on this album. don't use autotune and maybe people might believe she can actually sing
...
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

^ Well, Britney has never really been any good at anything other than dancing (which she can't manage now due to previous injury). So take her for what she is now, and always was...a manufactured pop star. Britney isn't like every other pop star. Every other pop star is like Britney.
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

^^^ eh, i disagree. there are a LOT who don't lower themselves to her... blegh-ness.
just my opinion.
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

^ Well, Britney has never really been any good at anything other than dancing (which she can't manage now due to previous injury). So take her for what she is now, and always was...a manufactured pop star. Britney isn't like every other pop star. Every other pop star is like Britney.

Agreed very much!
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

Congrats Britney on your 5th #1 single!!!!!
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

^ Well, Britney has never really been any good at anything other than dancing (which she can't manage now due to previous injury). So take her for what she is now, and always was...a manufactured pop star. Britney isn't like every other pop star. Every other pop star is like Britney.

Maybe Katy Perry and Rihanna. But even Katy Perry writes music and sings live. Sorry, I love Britney, but she is the ultimate manufactured pop star. Her dancing made her big and she can't even do that anymore. :confused:
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

WTF did they do to Britney's chorus in S&M?
More like what they didn't do.


The reason she sounds weak (At least to me) is they did not harmonize or put any fucking backing vocals on it


It sounds like Rihanna, when she sings the chorus, has 5 layers.

Whoever produced it didn't give Britney any, or at the very most two. I really am bothered that they did that. I mean now I like it but when I first heard it it was bizarre and I couldn't put my finger on it.

Her verse made me stand @ attention though


I LOVE aggressive Britney but I wish she collaborated on "Only Girl in the world" Something about Britney telling a guy she wants to feel like the only girl in the world works for me.

After reading this I think you're right, her parts do sound a little unpolished/not fully mastered. I was surprised to read this collab did happen within a span of a week. I thought this was planned well in advance only because Britney had mentioned a couple of times in interviews about "S&M" being one of her favorite songs. Like you I was able to eventually like this remix.
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

^ Well, Britney has never really been any good at anything other than dancing (which she can't manage now due to previous injury). So take her for what she is now, and always was...a manufactured pop star. Britney isn't like every other pop star. Every other pop star is like Britney.

Britney has never been good at anything other than dancing???

That's ridiculous.

She wouldn't still be topping the charts after 10+ years if that's was her only talent.
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

Britney has never been good at anything other than dancing???

That's ridiculous.

She wouldn't still be topping the charts after 10+ years if that's was her only talent.

Um, being able to produce a hit and go to number one has nothing to do with talent. Britney's strong points were here sex appeal and her dancing. The fact that she has gone to number has to do with her name/brand, the promotion, and her marketing.
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

Maybe Katy Perry and Rihanna. But even Katy Perry writes music and sings live. Sorry, I love Britney, but she is the ultimate manufactured pop star. Her dancing made her big and she can't even do that anymore. :confused:

Yeah, and Katy Perry fucking sucks at songwriting and singing. So I don't see your point.

Britney has never been good at anything other than dancing???

That's ridiculous.

She wouldn't still be topping the charts after 10+ years if that's was her only talent.

You get the right people working for you, you can do anything. Case-in-point...Katy Perry was a shitty Christian singer, hired Luke/Martin and has 5 #1s now. You take away Britney's production team and she is absolutely nothing as an 'artist'.
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

You get the right people working for you, you can do anything. Case-in-point...Katy Perry was a shitty Christian singer, hired Luke/Martin and has 5 #1s now. You take away Britney's production team and she is absolutely nothing as an 'artist'.

That's the case with all pop stars though.
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

Yeah, and Katy Perry fucking sucks at songwriting and singing. So I don't see your point.



You get the right people working for you, you can do anything. Case-in-point...Katy Perry was a shitty Christian singer, hired Luke/Martin and has 5 #1s now. You take away Britney's production team and she is absolutely nothing as an 'artist'.

Your opinion of Katy Perry's writing & singing abilities are irrelevant. Those writing & singing abilities have helped her get five #1's. Tell me...how many #1 hits has Britney written or even co-written? The answer won't take long to come up with.

Again, hate on Perry, but at the very least she does write and she does sing. Is she still manufactured...yes. To the point of Britney? Not even close.
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

Your opinion of Katy Perry's writing & singing abilities are irrelevant. Those writing & singing abilities have helped her get five #1's. Tell me...how many #1 hits has Britney written or even co-written? The answer won't take long to come up with.

Again, hate on Perry, but at the very least she does write and she does sing. Is she still manufactured...yes. To the point of Britney? Not even close.

Yes, and so are the opinions of all of her critics or anyone remotely musically trained...because people like you buy her shit, right? And that suddenly validates alleged artistic ability and merit? :lol:
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

Um, being able to produce a hit and go to number one has nothing to do with talent. Britney's strong points were here sex appeal and her dancing. The fact that she has gone to number has to do with her name/brand, the promotion, and her marketing.

So the only reason she is still #1 on the charts after 10 years is good marketing??!

That's laughable.


Britney fans love her for her talents. Period.
 
Re: The Official BRITNEY SPEARS Discussion Thread!

You get the right people working for you, you can do anything. Case-in-point...Katy Perry was a shitty Christian singer, hired Luke/Martin and has 5 #1s now. You take away Britney's production team and she is absolutely nothing as an 'artist'.

Katy Perry hasn't and will never touch Britney's level of fame and impact on pop culture. That isn't something you can just "create" with good marketing.

It's a natural "it" factor that very few have. Britney has that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top