Camilla Parker Bowles.

[pat grimshaw]

Then again Pat, we could send him to Australia and he can start telling your lot what to do....

In that case he would have to join this organisation which regulates those "lobbyists who hang around in lobbies trying to influence the MPs.
http://lobbyists.pmc.gov.au

 

[mikemizanin729]

telling your lot what to do. .

There is a difference between telling someone what the WILL do and telling them what they SHOULD do.


He's never imposed his will over anyone he merely suggests what is right.

 

[JohnnyAnger]

There is a difference between telling someone what the WILL do and telling them what they SHOULD do.


He's never imposed his will over anyone he merely suggests what is right.

Yes, well why does the Queen not do this? Why is there rules in place to stop this happening. Why is he refusing to have his letters to government come out? If he is merely suggesting what is right, he should have nothing to hide.

 

[bankside]

Well Prince Charles obviously. He has the makings of a great King.

I really don't get why so many people complain about him being a snobby Royal because he was born into Royalty and he has a snobby accent. What has he even done wrong to get some Jubbers to dislike him so much?

He seems decent.

No no, I am not asking you about Charles - more abstract than that, so don't just say Charles will be a good king. What makes a good King now?

Really I think Charles might just be the worst King the royals could ask for. His refusal to give up on political meddling, saying he won't even stop when he becomes King, means he might just bring down the monarchy.

For example, I'm not sure that wanting to be some woman's tampon shows the character and decorum that one might want to see in the leader of 16 commonwealth realms.

Worse than that, it makes him seem like he'd be a lousy lay. Like, how the fuck is that sexy?

So to answer Johnny's question, you can see an example of what a good king would be, in abstract, by simply considering the opposite of whatever Charles does in reality.

 

[JohnnyAnger]

Oh god I had forgotten about those phone calls *shudder*

 

[mikemizanin729]

His phone calls aren't important all that matters is that he is next in line and it's the way it should be. He is NEXT and the reasons he would make are great king are for the same reason the Queen made a good Queen.I think he does a lot for charity actually.

He does his bit just like the Queen and he may not be perfect, but he's human you know.

Camilla has the right to be where she is because she's rather respectable and honest and treats her fans well.

 

[mikemizanin729]

For example, I'm not sure that wanting to be some woman's tampon shows the character and decorum that one might want to see in the leader of 16 commonwealth realms.
.

His personal life has nothing to do with him being King does it?

 

[mikemizanin729]

Yes, well, why does the Queen not do this? Why is there rules in place to stop this happening. Why is he refusing to have his letters to government come out? If he is merely suggesting what is right, he should have nothing to hide.

I don't believe he makes anyone do anything.

 

[bankside]

His personal life has nothing to do with him being King does it?

Yeah well actually it does in most monarchical legal and constitutional theory. And anyway his public life mirrors his personal life. He wants to be the tampon of nonsensical organic food. He wants to be the tampon of twee pretend villages. He wants to be the tampon of faffing around doing little but pontificating.

 

[mikemizanin729]

He hardly does little. He may not do the same amount that the queen does, buty if he were king, he most likely would do more.

 

[mikemizanin729]

Yes, Camilla and HRH Charles are amazing people. It's a no wonder their Royalty and deserve to be treated as such.

Camilla has to be one of the most genuine women in the world. Excellent Royalty she is.

 

[mikemizanin729]

Oh god I had forgotten about those phone calls *shudder*

That man is Royalty.

 

[pigface]

, it's none of our business what they get up to in the bedroom department. It can be very disrespectful insulting the Prince of Wales, especially when we may someday bow to him as our King.

As king, he would be head of the church of england; and how can that be reconciled with his adultery? The bible - whether you believe it or not - is the cornerstone of the C of E, and in that we are told that adultery is to be punished by death.

The two of thm are moral degenerates and deserve no respect

At least Edward had the good grace to abdicate after slutting around with Wallace.

 

[Benvolio]

Mm

As king, he would be head of the church of england; and how can that be reconciled with his adultery? The bible - whether you believe it or not - is the cornerstone of the C of E, and in that we are told that adultery is to be punished by death.

The two of thm are moral degenerates and deserve no respect

At least Edwathe good grace to abdicate after slutting around with Wallace.

Who was it who said" Let him who is without sin cast the first stone."? She has been the love of his life. It just took a long while for then to be married.

 

[Cormac135]

I fear for the safety of Kate after what the two of them did to Diana, hopefully she's looking down and keeping watch over her.

 

[pigface]

Mm
Who was it who said" Let him who is without sin cast the first stone."?

My sins have nought to do with it.
HIS religion - and the religion under which HE was married, and the word of HIS god dicates:
"And the man that committeth adultery with another man's wife, even he that committeth adultery with his neighbour's wife, the adulterer and the adulteress shall surely be put to death." [Leviticus 20:10]

There was a time when the presiding monarch could say "Off with their heads!" and it would happen. Pity old Mrs Winsor couldn't and didn't.

 

[mikemizanin729]

The Bible

Are you talking about the same bible that doesn't believe in homosexuality?

..

I think it's a pity that HRH and Camilla aren't more adored. I believe they have redeemed themselves and all that Diana rubbish is over.

Diana herself certainly was no angel.I think Diana was a wannabe saint who only played up to the media for more attention.

 

[pigface]

Are you talking about the same bible that doesn't believe in homosexuality?

Yes, but neither charley nor the old bowels are doing anything gay - as far as we know.

But I can see what you are trying to do there... you want to discredit the bible as an authority because it doesn't match your or my likes. But that is spurious logic.
The royal family is intimately affilliated with the c-of-e, and as such, members have to abide by the rules. Otherwise they show themselves to be fakes and hypocrites.

If he renounces his title, he can do what he likes in bed with whoever, but he cannot do it while hanging onto his position in the monarchy.

 

[mikemizanin729]

If he renounces his title

He shouldn't renounce his title. I keep hearing this time and time again, but it seems the only reason so many Jubbers want him to renounce his title is because he made a tampon joke.

 

[mikemizanin729]

Camilla Parker-Bowles Drunk-Dialed Kate Middleton On Christmas Day After Skipping Royal Family Church Service-Report.


Kate Middleton was drunk-dialed by Camilla Parker-Bowles on Christmas Day after The Duchess of York skipped the Royal Family’s annual church ceremony Christmas morning, according to GLOBE Magazine. It’s no secret that Prince Charles’s second wife Camilla Parker-Bowles has had a bit of a drinking problem in the past, and the future Queen of England has reportedly fallen off the wagon…again. Queen Elizabeth recently revealed that she had no choice but to pass the throne on to Prince Charles and Camilla Parker-Bowles, because Prince William declined her offer to make him the next King. Apparently, Camilla has been partying like a rockstar ever since Queen Elizabeth’s shocking announcement, and was so drunk from her recent bender that she actually skipped the Royal Family’s annual church ceremony on Christmas Day.
The January 19 edition of GLOBE Magazine reveals, “Tensions between Camilla and her husband are so thick you can cut it with a knife. Even though they have called of their divorce so Charles can be the next King and she can be his Queen, they’re not getting along at all. And, when his pleas for her to quit boozing fell on deaf ears, Charles stormed out of their home, warning Camilla not to show her face in public until she sobered up.”
GLOBE Magazine goes on to reveal that on Christmas Day while the Royal Family was at church, Camilla Parker-Bowles was pounding drinks with some friends of hers – and she actually got so belligerent that she drunk-dialed her nemesis Kate Middleton while she was with Queen Elizabeth and Prince William. According to GLOBE, Kate Middleton refused to let Camilla pick a fight with her and play into her drama and promptly told her Prince William’s step-mother that she “was not fit to be Queen.” Camilla may be next in line to be Queen, but she can’t get over the fact that the public wishes Kate Middleton was in her place and adores the Duchess of Cambridge and despises her. Although Kate has never done anything to Camilla per se, the future Queen has been in a jealous rage ever since Kate Middleton and Prince William’s internet-breaking trip to New York City.


Full article here.

http://www.celebdirtylaundry.com/20...y-after-skipping-royal-family-church-service/

What do you all make of this?