fabulouslyghetto
Kween of Hot Topics
Is Black History Month outdated?
Hell yes! I appreciate black history month for what it was and what it's supposed to be, but it was created during a time when it was reasonable (PLEASE take that in context) to segregate and distinguish black Americans from "regular" Americans. With Obama's win aren't we a bit late in our failure to merge black history with American history?
BHM trivializes and specializes black contrbutions. Many people believe it's only about honoring slavery, they completely ignore that, from day one, blacks Americans have been right alongside their white counterparts contributing to medicine, technology, science, and especially the arts. The average American home is litered with products that directly or indirectly contain components of black inventions, and black Americans influence in the arts and culture are front and center almost as soon as you step out the house. There is too much to black American history to realistically expect it to be compacted into the shortest month of the year, and why does it STILL need to be separated?
This "celebration" of our history has fallen on exceptionally deaf ears in the black community. Many black teens and even adults can't name any historical black figures other than the household names, King, Parks, Tubman, etc.. In fact, many blacks are racist towards the black community, believing that we have done nothing but consume welfare dollars, they're unaware of the greatness of their heritage.
I also think there's widespread hypocrisy in the black community, a month-long celebration of our heritage vs. a year-long celebration of all things euro. Supposedly proud blacks spend hundreds of dollars lightening their skin, un-kinking their hair, buying clothes from expensive Italian designers they can't pronounce, and buying costly gadgets and gizmos that go into the pockets of rich white men who do nothing for the community. But we're proud?
DISCLAIMER: THE ARTICLE DOES NOT PROPOSE THAT WE STOP TEACHING BLACK HISTORY, RATHER THAT WE MERGE IT WITH THE REGULAR HISTORY CURRICULUM.
(I've been flamed to high hell because people think I'm saying we need to end all discussion/teachings of black history and accomplishments.)
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-02-07-black-history-month_N.htm
Hell yes! I appreciate black history month for what it was and what it's supposed to be, but it was created during a time when it was reasonable (PLEASE take that in context) to segregate and distinguish black Americans from "regular" Americans. With Obama's win aren't we a bit late in our failure to merge black history with American history?
BHM trivializes and specializes black contrbutions. Many people believe it's only about honoring slavery, they completely ignore that, from day one, blacks Americans have been right alongside their white counterparts contributing to medicine, technology, science, and especially the arts. The average American home is litered with products that directly or indirectly contain components of black inventions, and black Americans influence in the arts and culture are front and center almost as soon as you step out the house. There is too much to black American history to realistically expect it to be compacted into the shortest month of the year, and why does it STILL need to be separated?
This "celebration" of our history has fallen on exceptionally deaf ears in the black community. Many black teens and even adults can't name any historical black figures other than the household names, King, Parks, Tubman, etc.. In fact, many blacks are racist towards the black community, believing that we have done nothing but consume welfare dollars, they're unaware of the greatness of their heritage.
I also think there's widespread hypocrisy in the black community, a month-long celebration of our heritage vs. a year-long celebration of all things euro. Supposedly proud blacks spend hundreds of dollars lightening their skin, un-kinking their hair, buying clothes from expensive Italian designers they can't pronounce, and buying costly gadgets and gizmos that go into the pockets of rich white men who do nothing for the community. But we're proud?
DISCLAIMER: THE ARTICLE DOES NOT PROPOSE THAT WE STOP TEACHING BLACK HISTORY, RATHER THAT WE MERGE IT WITH THE REGULAR HISTORY CURRICULUM.
(I've been flamed to high hell because people think I'm saying we need to end all discussion/teachings of black history and accomplishments.)
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-02-07-black-history-month_N.htm
Should Black History Month itself fade into history? Many have long argued that African-American history should be incorporated into year-round education. Now, claims that Black History Month is outdated are gaining a new potency, as schools diversify their curricula and President Barack Obama's election opens a new chapter in the nation's racial journey.
"If Obama's election means anything, it means that African-American history IS American history and should be remembered and recognized every day of the year," says Stephen Donovan, a 41-year-old lawyer.
Ending "paternalistic" observances like Black History Month, Donovan believes, would lead to "not only a reduction in racism, but whites more ready and willing and able to celebrate our difference, enjoy our traditions, without feeling the stain of guilt that stifles frank dialogue and acceptance across cultures."
Yemesi Oyeniyi, a 40-year-old stay-at-home mother, says that Black History Month feels like it's only for blacks, "and therefore fails to educate the masses of non-blacks."


















