- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Posts
- 122,824
- Reaction score
- 4,067
- Points
- 113
Re: Funny anti-religious Internet pics
The rigging of the Council is something that was shown to me by an Augustinian and confirmed by a Jesuit -- and I figure if one of the "pope's shock troops" confirms it, it's no joke.
I don't know the bulls specifically, but they speak on the matter of not being required to violate one's conscience.
At any rate, I don't worry about it much, since any possibility of Rome's bishop speaking infallibly even as defined ended in 1054.
Papal Infallibility is only in the areas of Faith and Morals, not in anything else. As for the decision being rigged...I think you'd have a hard time proving that one.
There are very few Dogmas that are in fact made in Ex-Cathedera. Once Dogmas are set in stone, they are not to be questioned.
Church Traditions as in the big "T" or the little 't"? The ones that are the big T's are unchangeable, and the little t's are changeable. Now tell me what Traditions of the Church are you talking about, ie; specify exactly which ones....that will make a lot of sense, and I can understand what is being spoken of...not so easy when spoken in general. Also tell me which Papal Bulls you are talking about specifically, not in general.
The rigging of the Council is something that was shown to me by an Augustinian and confirmed by a Jesuit -- and I figure if one of the "pope's shock troops" confirms it, it's no joke.
I don't know the bulls specifically, but they speak on the matter of not being required to violate one's conscience.
At any rate, I don't worry about it much, since any possibility of Rome's bishop speaking infallibly even as defined ended in 1054.


)