gay/bi/homo should be executed

[gsdx]

No, they are neutral against religion but will pound on any wrong with religion.

I think you should look up the word 'neutral' in a dictionary. You can be 'for' something (including religion) or 'against' something, or you can 'neutral', meaning you are neither for nor against something. You cannot be 'neutral' whilst being 'for' or 'against' something. As soon as you are, you're not neutral any more.

Try to learn instead of building up walls.

 

[jcpp7622]

It's one thing that this jerk-off preacher is saying this stuff. The other thing, though, is there are the psychotic morons who will act.

 

[Telstra]

Neutral means non-believers do not take sides between religions

 

[gsdx]

Neutral means non-believers do not take sides between religions

You are SO wrong. Not believing in religion means that you HAVE taken sides.

 

[Telstra]

I can say which one is worst is natural, normal and neutral

 

[MrPerfectMan]

Who wants to build bridges with some asshole who counsels murder? WTF is wrong with you?

I'm not sure 'WTF' is wrong with you? You obviously didn't address any of my points (probably intentionally) so you could continue on your tirade. I never said I wanted to build a bridge with THAT particular pastor. Ever hear the idiom about not painting everyone is any group of people with the same brush? I can only assume so, since you're on a gay forum.

 

[Taz]

I can say which one is worst is natural, normal and neutral

Can you imagine somebody so profoundly free of intelligent thought that they do not understand the concept of neutral, less compare it to normal and natural?

I bet your mirror can

 

[gsdx]

^ I told him to look it up in a dictionary. Apparently, he didn't. Then again, looking it up would prove to him that he is wrong.

 

[Telstra]

You guys are petty with words.
I don't do what i want with words

 

[johaninsc]

Neutral means non-believers do not take sides between religions

My apologies, Telly....for a moment I had forgotten your great wisdom in these matters





now take the choo choo and go play...

 

[gsdx]

We're not 'pretty' with them. We just use them correctly for the most part instead of using them to mean what we want them to mean.

 

[Kahaih]

Neutral means non-believers do not take sides between religions

The key word, here, being 'between'.

I get what you mean. 'Non-believer' as an outsider looking in on a conflict between two or more religions, or religious ideas/beliefs, and with which the 'non-believer' has no affiliation.

The same as having a court appointed mediator (an outsider) involved in a labor dispute between workers and management. The mediator is neither a worker nor management – he/she starts the task on no one's side.

 

[Telstra]

The key word, here, being 'between'.

I get what you mean. 'Non-believer' as an outsider looking in on a conflict between two or more religions, or religious ideas/beliefs, and with which the 'non-believer' has no affiliation.

The same as having a court appointed mediator (an outsider) involved in a labor dispute between workers and management. The mediator is neither a worker nor management – he/she starts the task on no one's side.

Kahaih got it.
A few others just wanted to annoy LOL

 

[MrPerfectMan]

You guys are petty with words.
I don't do what i want with words

What I am hearing is, you can't quite debate certain points made, so you're gonna try and distract everyone with hot air.

 

[gsdx]

Kahaih got it.
A few others just wanted to annoy LOL

If we wanted to annoy, we would post the way you do.

We're trying to educate.

 

[Willie Boy]

Neutral means non-believers do not take sides between religions

But the term non-believer is not neutral. Non-believer is someone who has chosen the opposite of the believer. Neutral would be one who is open to belief if he/she saw evidence to support it. Non-believers shun such evidence in favor of their non-belief.

Neutral mediators would be great, but they rarely exist on any issue for the simple fact that most have already formed hardened opinions on either side. And in both cases those opinions are rarely formed from fact but whim and rumor.

 

[Telstra]

Non-belief is neutral because
IF there is proven evidence we will believe.

 

[MrPerfectMan]

Non-belief is neutral because
IF there is proven evidence we will believe.

I already said I could explain away your existence if you were standing right in front of me. What you want is to be catered to.

 

[gsdx]

Non-belief is neutral because
IF there is proven evidence we will believe.

Last time:

Belief ........ Neutral (neither believing nor not believing) ......... Non-belief.

You can be only one of those at a time. It is impossible to be otherwise.

(Do you do this on purpose?)

 

[Willie Boy]

Last time:

Belief ........ Neutral (neither believing nor not believing) ......... Non-belief.

You can be only one of those at a time. It is impossible to be otherwise.

(Do you do this on purpose?)

Yes he does. Do you really think he has THAT much trouble with so simple a concept.