The Original Gay Porn Community - Free Gay Movies and Photos, Gay Porn Site Reviews and Adult Gay Forums

  • Welcome To Just Us Boys - The World's Largest Gay Message Board Community

    In order to comply with recent US Supreme Court rulings regarding adult content, we will be making changes in the future to require that you log into your account to view adult content on the site.
    If you do not have an account, please register.
    REGISTER HERE - 100% FREE / We Will Never Sell Your Info

    PLEASE READ: To register, turn off your VPN (iPhone users- disable iCloud); you can re-enable the VPN after registration. You must maintain an active email address on your account: disposable email addresses cannot be used to register.

  • Hi Guest - Did you know?
    Hot Topics is a Safe for Work (SFW) forum.

Gay Marriage Updates By State

HOORAY!!!

Walker being gay is about as much an "excuse" as the color of his eyes.

If this was upheld, it would set a very, VERY dangerous precedent, at least in California.

The defendant's attorney could require an appeals Judge to recuse herself, because the defendant is also a woman.

...recuse him/herself, because the defendant assaulted a Republican, and the Judge used to be an attorney for ACLU/liberal causes.

...recuse him/herself, because the defendant and the Judge are both African-American.

ETC
 
metta said:
NY's top Catholic officials seek to halt Senate vote on legalizing gay marriage


there is also a poll...right now it is 82% yes and 17% no.... :)

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...t_senate_vote_on_legalizing_gay_marriage.html
Click to expand...

Dolan is a putrid pile of pious pomposity, pretending to perfection in his opinions. He needs to be slapped hard on the face and have his nose shoved into a Bible, and told to go learn what Jesus meant when He said, "Render to Caesar what is Caesar's".
 
RazorzEdge88 said:
OMG! :D That's great news on New York. I hope they take a vote there already.Why's that? I had been expecting it to be settled within the next year considering they only have to rule on the issue of standing. Is it expected to take considerably longer than that?
Click to expand...

Well, it might be by then if standing is denied and the case ends.

If standing is granted then it will take longer.

So it really depends on how the standing question comes down.

I'm not that confident that standing is going to be denied.
 
someone explain this to me:

if prop 8 is deemed unconstitutional, is gay-marriage legal in cali? if not, (as it's not lol, i already know that answer) why not?

i thought prop 8 was in response to cali legalizing gay marriage. /not an american, but still interested in marriage equality news in the states.
 
^
Yes, if prop 8 is deemed unconstitutional, as stated by the previous judge, marriage would become legal in California...that is once all the legal proceedings are done.....which will probably include the Federal Supreme Court. So it is going to be a while.
 
The hate group NOM knows they are going to lose, so they are doing everything they can to slow things down to maximize the amount of money they can get out their contributors while they can.

Prop 8 Proponents Vow to Appeal Ruling Denying Motion to Dismiss Over Judge's Sexuality


http://www.towleroad.com/2011/06/a-word-on-todays-prop-8-decision.html
 
metta said:
The hate group NOM knows they are going to lose, so they are doing everything they can to slow things down to maximize the amount of money they can get out their contributors while they can.

Prop 8 Proponents Vow to Appeal Ruling Denying Motion to Dismiss Over Judge's Sexuality


http://www.towleroad.com/2011/06/a-word-on-todays-prop-8-decision.html
Click to expand...


well wait, the judge already ruled that the ruling on prop 8 should stand, and that the judge's sexual orientation doesn't matter. so... shouldn't gay marriage now be legal as of today?

they vowed to appeal the decision, well, ok, but they haven't yet... so what happens for now?
 
^
no...they only ruled on the request by Nasty NOM to cancel the original court cases decision based on the judge's sexual orientation. Nasty NOM is now saying that they want to appeal the decision that was made yesterday to not cancel it based on his sexual orientation.

The main current case (not original case) is the appeal of the original judges ruling that prop 8 is unconstitutional. No decision has been made on this.

These are 2 separate issues.

Obviously, Nasty NOM is doing whatever they can to drag this out as long as possible.
 
It looks like things are looking good over in New York.

When will we get to know the result?

I hope California is next.
 
RazorzEdge88 said:
Oh, pffft. Well you seem to be off on that.
Click to expand...

Based on what?

We don't know at this point how the CA supreme court will rule, but from the arguments before the 9th, I got the sense they felt the no standing argument was not that strong.
 
As far as NY - the State Assembly is working on the legislation tonight. Senate won't get to the point of seeing if Republican majority will allow it to come up for a vote before tomorrow or Friday.

Cuomo is pushing hard to get it passed before they adjourn for the Summer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top