If you ever say you are "straight acting" that is a copout

[cgymike]

I am publicly "out" in small town America; everyone knows that I'm gay. However, I'm not RuPaul's Drag Race gay, so a lot of tourist girls try to put the "hey baby" on me. Furthermore, most of the strippers that my cousin has at his bar hit on me to no end ... maybe it's the unattainable goal for them for something.

straight acting = being masculine apparently

So if you are not straight acting you aren't masculine

 

[TX-Beau]

I resent that! I LOVE RuPaul's Drag Race and most other people I know who love it are waaaaay on the masculine side. That show is just way too awesome for people not to like it

I think you should go count all the instances of guys defending "SA" saying some variation of:

"...but but but straight people think I'm straight!..."

(you should do it because I'm just no longer that invested (read lazy))



Honestly "Straight People" think I'm straight! AAARRGGHHH! ME! My brah shit has been validated by STRAIGHT PEOPLE!!! SUCK IT NANCY!

LOL

I bet "Straight People" think you're straight Rolyo. "Straight People" certainly think I'm straight. "Straight People" thought LIBERACE was straight!

BWAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!

Actually "Straight People" just think it's rude to tell you you're just a big Ole' Helen 'MO!!

LOL

 

[TX-Beau]

Sooooooooooo.........

Page 13.

Are we in agreement yet?

 

[cgymike]

^I am a liberal so we will never be in agreement

j/k

 

[TX-Beau]

But we can be in consensus!

I LOOOOONGGGG to be in consensus. Then I can ya know, just be all chill and shit.

 

[xbuzzerx]

But we can be in consensus!

I LOOOOONGGGG to be in consensus. Then I can ya know, just be all chill and shit.

 

[cgymike]

^^No I not going to be a muppet or bauble head here....

 

[eastofeden]

^I am a liberal so we will never be in agreement

j/k

You know the funny thing about that...on this and every site I have been on...the liberals will disagree vehemently...and often...with each other. The conservatives will RARELY...if EVER...disagree with anything another conservative says.

 

[xbuzzerx]

You know the funny thing about that...on this and every site I have been on...the liberals will disagree vehemently...and often...with each other. The conservatives will RARELY...if EVER...disagree with anything another conservative says.

That is certainly the different natures of the two, and you see it reflected in national politics.

 

[TX-Beau]

You know the funny thing about that...on this and every site I have been on...the liberals will disagree vehemently...and often...with each other. The conservatives will RARELY...if EVER...disagree with anything another conservative says.

That's because of the hive mind.

 

[TX-Beau]

My sister who’s a schoolteacher but actually does have one of those Sociology PhD.s we all despise so – you know, the one that lets her wear the bone in her hair and dance around the fire – has this theory.

She says that as the gay population finds it easier and easier to be out, and acceptance rises, other demographic factors become more important. Race, socio-economic status, even religion will re-emerge as dividing factors.

Basically “Gay” is a “minority” dependent on its own oppression. The uniting factor in generations past has been the struggle to overcome that oppression. “Out” gay men of the past were likely to have been more iconoclastic and anti-established order anyway considering the pressure to stay closeted (your average gay just stayed closeted,) and that the end of the “community” they established may be a consequence of their success in de-stigmatizing gay men and women.

If you apply that idea:

Enter “SA” something that was bound to develop since the bigotry that drove gay men together, or kept them hidden has lessened to the point where it is possible to be gay in a hetero environment without the support of that part of the gay demo that is an outlier in society anyway. (Read visible)

These guys who in generations past would have been ostracized by heteros (thus pushing them together with other gay men), or just stayed closeted, have always felt more comfortable attempting to blend into mainstream culture.

 

[SLOPPYSECONDS]

My sister who’s a schoolteacher but actually does have one of those Sociology PhD.s we all despise so – you know, the one that lets her wear the bone in her hair and dance around the fire – has this theory.

She says that as the gay population finds it easier and easier to be out, and acceptance rises, other demographic factors become more important. Race, socio-economic status, even religion will re-emerge as dividing factors.

Basically “Gay” is a “minority” dependent on its own oppression. The uniting factor in generations past has been the struggle to overcome that oppression. “Out” gay men of the past were likely to have been more iconoclastic and anti-established order anyway considering the pressure to stay closeted (your average gay just stayed closeted,) and that the end of the “community” they established may be a consequence of their success in de-stigmatizing gay men and women.

If you apply that idea:

Enter “SA” something that was bound to develop since the bigotry that drove gay men together, or kept them hidden has lessened to the point where it is possible to be gay in a hetero environment without the support of that part of the gay demo that is an outlier in society anyway. (Read visible)

These guys who in generations past would have been ostracized by heteros (thus pushing them together with other gay men), or just stayed closeted, have always felt more comfortable attempting to blend into mainstream culture.

go weed it

thankyou

* icebucket ors a iceberg? *
mini iceberg
* whack here ya is *
aww so sweet

 

[Native Son]

go weed it

thankyou

* icebucket ors a iceberg? *
mini iceberg
* whack here ya is *
aww so sweet

Oh, look who's here.

 

[cgymike]

Removed and replied to in private.

 

[Rolyo85]

That's because of the hive mind.

Lol you're my spiritual Texas twin.

 

[Rolyo85]

My sister who’s a schoolteacher but actually does have one of those Sociology PhD.s we all despise so – you know, the one that lets her wear the bone in her hair and dance around the fire – has this theory.

She says that as the gay population finds it easier and easier to be out, and acceptance rises, other demographic factors become more important. Race, socio-economic status, even religion will re-emerge as dividing factors.

Basically “Gay” is a “minority” dependent on its own oppression. The uniting factor in generations past has been the struggle to overcome that oppression. “Out” gay men of the past were likely to have been more iconoclastic and anti-established order anyway considering the pressure to stay closeted (your average gay just stayed closeted,) and that the end of the “community” they established may be a consequence of their success in de-stigmatizing gay men and women.

If you apply that idea:

Enter “SA” something that was bound to develop since the bigotry that drove gay men together, or kept them hidden has lessened to the point where it is possible to be gay in a hetero environment without the support of that part of the gay demo that is an outlier in society anyway. (Read visible)

These guys who in generations past would have been ostracized by heteros (thus pushing them together with other gay men), or just stayed closeted, have always felt more comfortable attempting to blend into mainstream culture.

I'm ok with the dissipation of the gay community a) because that means it's no longer necessary and b) because there will ALWAYS be a type of community or scene since, yunno, gay boys wanna have fun with other gay boys.

 

[borg69unimatrix]

That's because of the hive mind.

Watch it, Buster.

 

[KaraBulut]

Discussion is continuing in a poll thread: POLL IT:- Straight-acting

This thread closed.