JayHawk
Rambunctiously Pugnacious
I love the mix of reactions in here.
I do find it ironic that kicking in doors, grabbing the exact terrorist, depriving him of sleep for more information and detaining him at GITMO was so horrifying to my liberal friends.
But when President Obama orders a drone to blow up grandma, the kids, the wife, and hopefully the terrorist, his position is so much more revered by my liberal friends.
Which method do you think does more to inspire new terrorists? I personally think President Obama's preferred method insures a much broader and deeper generational hatred. What do you think?
It is interesting. And while I have softened my arguing against the ridiculous statements against the right on here and have defended more of my liberal social ideas I still have no wavered from one admin to the next. We must not show weakness to these folks. ignoring them does not make them go away.
Unfortunately as energy becomes less and less available we will have more and more terror and restricted liberty.
sort of rhetorical
you're not gonna get any reaction here
cause your question HURTS as there is no response
that will make sense that is
crickets![]()
The only sign of a win in JUB CE&P. Typically no one EVER admits they were owned. Silence is the only white flag you will see in these parts.
Just beware when they call the next phase of the Drone program, "Skynet"![]()
Hmmmmm.... anti-terminator, resistance fighter, end of the world scenario, dirty resistance fighter sex, ......... slight fantasy.......... nahhhhhh











 ](*,)](/images/smilies/bang.gif)